Rules for thee... Big Tech get away Scot free. What good is a settlement in court when $50 million to a "human" is a lifetime vs. $50 million for a massive conglomerate is half a second? The FTC holding a balance of power based in a Fiat market where the many outweigh the few isn't using the scales of justice. It's using that power over the individual to enslave an entire population to the conglomerate. The fines should be based on how many people are employed by the guilty party. Not conviction of an entire population that had nothing to do with what that one conglomerate did. The below is a premeditated act based on an engineered crisis that never existed before Big Tech invented the judge, jury and executioner from a criminal act they also invented. I have a massive problem with what the FTC is about to do and you should too. A single employee involved in the crime is about to be used as a patsy and that is wrong, the entire corporate entity needs to pay in full based on how many people they employ, not get away with billions of taxpayer dollars without just compensation in the form of permanent infrastructure. Confiscate the Corp. and auction it off. Employees that get laid off due to those consequences can sue for compensation and if the FTC is involved in mitigation of costs then they can sue the Federal Government for damages. End of story.

I’m happy to report I’ve received nothing from @UsePaid

the upload is the only point of having fiber and if you dont get full-duplex it's a scam

That's interesting, full-scale tech people I know are doing the same in the US because the cable is garbage and fiber doesn't exist outside of wealthy high-populated areas or factory farming localities surrounded by homes that don't get access to fiber without a massive debt.

Ha! Sorry about that but, it's still funny AF to see Elon (nearly a trillionaire) get deposits from @UsePaid 🤣

god's plan

I'm pretty sure all pets do that when we leave them home alone. 🤣

The hack was traced back to a Russian IP *37.77.150.95* which screams loudly that the IP is planted. What problem am I referring to? Any guesses?

One more thing, assume each AI model were to be mandated to have it's own internal clock... by law. That would add a security layer for all of us when interacting with any AI model simply by having an immutable timestamp of events including, training an AI to commit a crime. That internal clock would be evidence in a court of law. In-turn, that would prevent any pre-meditated misuse of any AI model to be used as a tool to commit any crime on someone's else's behalf that could alter any data or delete training logs. Sometimes, the most simple things can have the most profound changes. 🤔

THEN: The Nazis euthanized 250,000 mentally ill people during WWII. NOW: Canada will vote October 7 on whether to euthanize mentally ill people. And they say we're Nazis.

Can The Sun's Heat Produce Cold? ☀️❄️🤔 How to build your own 100% solar-powered DIY freezer (that reaches -48°C 🥶), with basic hardware store parts, in a single afternoon 👇

Good question, learning a lot from the replies...

cool, it's almost like world of warships but, in space

💯

but, there isn't position for a "retarded genius" that I can apply for🤦‍♂️

It's Friday night, I don't want to wait so, look for a new article and prepare yourselves. This one might break your brain wide open. "AI's don't have a day."

Privileged access lives in code where the design put it. ShinyHunters found the back-door allowed by FISA 702 and 47 USC Article 230. Patching one exploit does not prove that path was removed, and it does not prove a hidden decrypt door was kept. It only proves the vendor closed the hole they admitted with protections under the law. “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” ~ Article 230 All the exploits do is point to the problem. So ask yourself... what is the problem?