NEW INVESTIGATION: Did Soros Foundation Money Travel Through Charities Into the 2024 Presidential Race?
Full investigation with receipts
🔗
whitecollarfraud.com/2026/06…
Money you can deduct on your taxes is supposed to fund charity, not campaigns. Here's a trail that runs from a tax-deductible donation to a presidential super PAC — entirely on public IRS returns.
The rule it tests is simple. A 501(c)(3) charity takes deductible dollars but can't spend on politics. A 501(c)(4) can spend on politics but offers no deduction. So when charitable money passes from a (c)(3), through intermediary charities, into a (c)(4) that spends it on campaigns, a tax-deductible dollar has been turned into political spending. That is the line §4955 of the tax code exists to police — and the intermediaries here are two charitable networks, Arabella and Tides.
Here's where the returns say the money went. Two George Soros private foundations sent $92,465,850 to the Arabella charities — New Venture, Hopewell, and Windward. Those same charities moved $343,967,196 to the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a 501(c)(4) political arm.
On a separate path, a Soros foundation routed money through the Tides Foundation, which sent $842,000 directly across the charitable-to-political line into that same fund.
Two further routes added more: Open Society Policy Center, a Soros-affiliated 501(c)(4), gave $68,150,000 directly, and Tides Advocacy, another Soros-linked political fund, added $4,169,700. In all, $417,128,896 reached the Sixteen Thirty Fund.
Now the last step. The Sixteen Thirty Fund and an affiliated political fund sent $13,739,642 to a federal super PAC — about 59% of its itemized receipts. The PAC spent $19,799,415 naming federal candidates, including $12,718,076 supporting the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee.
That closes the chain: charity → charity → political fund → super PAC → the presidential race. A tax-deductible foundation dollar at the top. Federal campaign spending at the bottom. Every rung on a public return.
Every step is permissible in isolation. A foundation may grant to a charity; a charity may grant to a 501(c)(4); a 501(c)(4) may spend on politics. But assembled from the returns, the sequence shows tax-deductible foundation dollars moving step by step toward candidate-directed federal spending.
The question the rules exist to answer: were charitable assets, in substance, converted into political campaign spending? Only the IRS can see the grant agreements and donor records that settle it — and the findings have been referred there.
I'm a forensic accountant and a registered Democrat. I follow the documents, not the politics. Every figure here is from the organizations' own IRS returns.
Full chain, line by line, with sources:
🔗
whitecollarfraud.com/2026/06…
ALT Flow diagram tracing four documented funding routes into the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a 501(c)(4) political organization. Two routes pass through intermediary charities: Foundation to Promote Open Society and Open Society Institute, both 501(c)(3) Soros foundations, fund the Tides Foundation and the Arabella charities (New Venture, Hopewell, and Windward), which in turn grant to the Sixteen Thirty Fund. Two further routes go directly: Open Society Policy Center/OSAF and Tides Advocacy, both 501(c)(4) organizations, fund the Sixteen Thirty Fund without an intermediary. The Sixteen Thirty Fund, together with its sibling North Fund, contributed to Your Community PAC, which spent $19.8 million on independent expenditures naming federal candidates, including $12,718,076 supporting Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election. All flows are documented from the organizations' own IRS Form 990 filings and Federal Election Commission disclosures.