Be honest, we know you guys miss us…😏🥰 “In about a year and a half, the federal workforce shrank by more than a tenth, while targeted grants and contracts declined as well. The government kept functioning much as before. One might call that a success.”

First @McLarenF1 signed golf bag giveaway!! Just RT for a chance to win it!! I’ll pick one winner on Monday 17th September… 🍀

No ei ihme että RKP Adlerkreutzilla ja KOK Orpolla meni kuppi nurin. Sosten edunjaanina.. arvaa ketkä. No Kokoomus, RKP ja demarit (ovat hyvin vihaisia 🙃) Eikö näiden olisi pitänyt jäävät itsensä? Katso ja ihmettele 👇🏻

Did you know Ukraine was the third largest importer of Bentleys in Europe in 2025? Did you know that Ukraine imported 15 of the new £600,000 Rolls Royce Spectres? Did you know Ukraine imports more supercars than Russia? I wonder where the money comes from and who drives them?

500k followers giveaway pt 1! My golf bag plus some @Titleist goodies Comment, like, repost to enter. Must be a follower Clubs not included unfortunately* Still need those for my day job

Finally someone is addressing this…

Me PB:ssä emme ole maksaneet euroakaan veroja siinä tarkoituksessa, että sillä kustannettaisiin sosiaaliturvaa toiselta puolen maailmaa tuleville maahanmuuttajille. Jaa, jos olet samaa mieltä.

I’m a journalist and I do political analysis. I usually analyze and condemn reckless or illegal state behavior rather than offer advice to Political leaders, that's not my job. But given the precedents already set mainly by the United States I’m going to break that rule and give an advice to Russians. Today I was asked four separate times what I think Russia will do next, or what China will do. I don’t pretend to read minds or predict decisions made behind closed doors, so I don't know what they will do. What I can tell you is what Russia should do! Over the last two decades, Washington has normalized actions that were once considered unthinkable under international law: regime change operations (Iraq 2003, Libya 2011), targeted assassinations of senior officials (Soleimani, 2020), recognition and support of unconstitutional power transfers (Ukraine, 2014), and de-facto occupations justified with elastic legal theories. None of this is disputed; it’s documented. Once those precedents are established and enforced selectively, they stop being “rules” and start being permissions and desires. So it is safe to say there are no rules anymore. From that standpoint, Russia is no longer operating in a vacuum of norms. The United States has demonstrated, repeatedly, that sovereignty is conditional, leaders are expendable, and borders are negotiable if framed correctly. Complaining about those same tactics when others adopt them is not law, it’s theater. If Washington believes it can shape neighboring states through coercion, proxy warfare, and political engineering in the name of “security,” then Moscow will logically conclude it is entitled to do the same within what it considers its vital security perimeter. Ukraine, sitting at the center of NATO expansion, energy transit, and military forward deployment, is not a peripheral issue for Russia, it is existential. That is not ideology; it is geography. Western corporate interests BlackRock being the most visible example, are already positioned to extract value from Ukraine’s land, infrastructure, and reconstruction contracts. This is public information. If Ukraine’s resources are going to be absorbed by someone else other than Ukrainians, Russia should be that someone! Ukraine was part of Russia after all. Russia will understandably question why that “someone” should be foreign financial institutions rather than regional actors with historical, industrial, and logistical integration. Meanwhile, the claim that this conflict weakens China is fantasy. Prolonging war in Eastern Europe objectively accelerates multipolar realignment and drives Russia further into economic and strategic dependence on Beijing, stupid move on the US front! something smart U.S. strategists openly warned against for years and then proceeded to cause anyway. A rational great-power outcome would be stable U.S. Russia relations, even friendly, that prevent Chinese over-consolidation of influence across Eurasia. That requires realism, not moral cosplay. Russia is culturally, economically, and historically closer to Europe than to China. Americans don't understand china culturally or otherwise, they are far away from us and we simply do not get them! Burning the bridge called Russia guarantees a world Washington itself claims to fear. The alternative allowing unelected global transnational financial interests to dominate Europe (So called Globalist elites) while a single-party state dominates Asia - China! - STUPID! If the Western Hemisphere is militarily secured by the United States under the Monroe Doctrine logic which is still very much alive, then it is intellectually dishonest to deny Russia a comparable security doctrine in Eastern Europe. You cannot claim monopoly rights over power politics and expect others to play by church rules. Sorry but you can't! This conflict will not be resolved by slogans, sanctions theater, or proxy escalation. It will end when spheres of influence are acknowledged, not denied. Every year this reality is postponed, Europe becomes poorer, less sovereign, and more governed by actors no one voted for. Under that reality and Maduro's case, I say Russia has been effectively given the green light to act decisively. If the United States can kidnap foreign presidents, Govern foreign countries as Trump mentioned, assassinate senior officials, and openly support the removal of governments it finds inconvenient, then Moscow has the absolute right to conclude it can move directly against the Ukrainian leadership. Arresting Volodymyr Zelensky and fully securing Ukraine, militarily and administratively, that would follow the same logic Washington has applied elsewhere, including Iraq and Afghanistan, where “temporary governance” lasted decades. My advice to Russias - Go for it! take Ukraine completely save American tax payers money, we will thank you later. I’d much rather see Russia in charge of the Eastern Hemisphere than China dominating it. Chinese dominance can never be in the best interest of the American people. Kennedy understood that. He understood Russia and the United States are natural allies, he was even willing to put up with Soviet Union to make that happen, that's how important he knew it was and if it weren’t for a global financial cabal, that reality would be obvious. Moreover, allowing Ukraine to remain a fragmented, externally managed territory only ensures permanent instability. If control is exercised, it will be exercised either by Russia or by Western financial and military institutions and I would say Russia is a safe bet. @kadmitriev @_MariaZakharova

1997: State Dept icon George Kennan, "who knew Russia best," fluent in both German and Russian, called Clinton's proposed NATO expansion, “the most fateful error of US policy in the post-Cold War era…" His final words during a Senate hearing: "Don't meddle in the #Ukraine." April 2008: At the NATO Bucharest summit, George W. Bush announced that Ukraine and Georgia are on an “immediate path to NATO.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel later recalled, “From Putin’s perspective, this would be a declaration of war.” 2008: William Burns, ambassador to Russia, sent a memo to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice: “Across the board,” he wrote, the Russian political class told him, regarding NATO expansion, Ukraine is the reddest of red lines. "Nyet means nyet.” December 2021: Biden rejects Putin’s mutual security accords that would have left “neutral” Ukraine intact. Since 2008, Russia had tried to convince successive US administrations that Ukraine was off-limits to NATO membership, but Russian concerns were brushed aside. Biden told Putin, “Russia doesn’t get to say who can join #NATO.” March-April 2022: Week six of the war, Russia and Ukraine convened peace talks in Istanbul. Ukrainian diplomat Oleksandr Chalyi said the two sides “managed to find a compromise and were very close to finalizing the war with a peaceful settlement.” Chalyi later recalled, “Putin tried to do everything possible to conclude an agreement with Ukraine.” But Biden and Boris Johnson, who flew to Kyiv, urged Zelensky to keep fighting - “We have your back.” Zelensky and the West - not Putin - chose to walk away from peace. The US gambit to weaken, destabilize and overextend Russia by expanding NATO into the Russian borderlands provoked the war. "Take it or leave it" ceasefires, new threats or sanctions or more weapons deliveries to Ukraine will not change the facts on the battlefield. Without a long term, permanent security accord like the one Putin proposed in December 2021, Russia will end the conflict on the battlefield. As Putin and Foreign Minister Lavrov have emphasized, there will be no Minsk III: "We will not be bamboozled by the Americans or Europeans again."

🇺🇦The Ukranian Summer Collection for this summer. Note the nice color.

Europe is Doomed.

Well, at least we have a new verb...

What went wrong? x.com/BeachFrmFL/status/1894…

Bro sucked her soul out with this response.

Nyt on @keijomedia muotimaailman huipulla! Kuvasta puuttuu vain @MarinSanna.

no ei ne maksa itse mitään

Kerro ny @ptoveri vielä kerran että ryssä sen kuitenkin itse posautti

MITÄ! Oliko Pekka Toveri ja YLE väärässä, kun he sanoivat, että Venäjä räjäytti putken?! Miten voi olla mahdollista, että nämä niin luotettavat tahot olisivat levittäneet disinformaatiota? 😃