Believer/Voter of common sense šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡øšŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø

Washington, USA
Undivided Brandi Kruse and Nicole Thompson are the greatest ladies in the business ā¤ļø. It’s a shame that mainstream media can’t even serve Washington State residents with reporting on even a sliver of the great reporting these ladies do on a podcast.
4
6
56
1,615
Volunteered with Brek and Trent with Let’s Go Washington out out Harper Park in Port Orchard this morning, helping spread the word to vote YES on all 3 initiatives. I got some signs and will be out informing people out in Seabeck.
1
2
47
12thman4Life retweeted
Works at the shipyard huh? I’m glad this dumbass isn’t on my crew! Pretty sure you can get in some trouble for threatening people, if you work for government. Wonder how he is going to justify his actions to his family, if he loses his job! Spread this video people.
Cleaner video of the ā€œWatch your neckā€ man Someone on the interwebs reached out and claimed he works at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Maybe he thought he was just being cute - it wasn’t
1
1
92
12thman4Life retweeted
Replying to @letsgowa
Send your disgust to comment@utc.wa.gov here is a sample letter. Edit how ya like. To Whom It May Concern:I am a PSE customer writing in strong opposition to the forced removal of natural gas as a household option. This policy is reckless.Washington’s electric system is already unreliable. In King County, modest wind events regularly cause outages. During the worst of them, gas kept my family warm and fed. We cooked on a gas stove and heated rooms with a gas fireplace. That is a practical safeguard, not a luxury.How are people expected to heat their homes when the power fails? If gas service is taken away, many will turn to gasoline generators that pollute far more than natural gas. Solar is not a serious winter solution here.The contradiction is obvious. PSE says it needs gas for peak winter demand, yet households would be denied the same fuel. Removing end-user gas while increasing the utility’s own gas use is not coherent policy. A requested 29 percent rate increase in 2027 only compounds the harm.I oppose the forced electrification of my household and of roughly 900,000 other citizens. Policymakers do not have the standing to impose this level of risk without a far more honest accounting of reliability and cost.I expect a direct response to these points.Sincerely, [Your Name] PSE Customer
1
78
12thman4Life retweeted
The State Supreme Court ruling to throw out I-2066 because it "wasn't single subject" means that every law passed through the legislature must be held to the same standard. Read more on LGW's response to the ruling here: letsgowashington.com/lgw-res…
12
57
241
2,620
12thman4Life retweeted
How do you cut money that doesn't exist šŸ¤”
They're telling you repealing the income tax will cut school funding. Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center tells @jcurleyshow the problem with that claim is simple: not a single dollar of income tax revenue has been collected yet, and it won't be for three years
1
10
38
833
Did the Washington State Supreme Court hold off for months, before releasing their judgement on agreeing with democrat leaders in our state to work towards banning natural gas in our state, despite voters voting to keep natural gas? Did they wait until now, to show voters that they don’t care what you want, we control this state? I sure hope voters get out and vote, instead of not voting YES for the upcoming 3 initiatives, feeling that their vote doesn’t matter in our state.@thehoffather @BrandiKruse @JimWalshLD19 @bkheywood
Mid-week viewing. My segment with John Curley on KIRO Radio. The State Supreme Court is playing politics with its shady natural gas initiative ruling. Sets a bad precedent. Violated the WA Code of Judicial Conduct. Excerpt: "...this [6-3] opinion on the natural-gas initiative was ready months ago. They released it now to make a point, a statement—a kind of flex—about the State Supreme Court’s willingness to override the will of the people.ā€ piped.video/BJ4o4Rx7HV0?is=_Kxx…
1
78
Yup, sounds like Seattle šŸ¤¦šŸ¼ā€ā™‚ļø
BREAKING NEWS! Seattle is trending nationally. From @waDCYF daycare fraud to crazed @MayorofSeattle crime wave. How embarrassing. What a shame. @AGOWA and @GovBobFerguson place the E on the end of SHAM. Thanks @lfs6b
1
2
49
🚨 How to find Somali daycare’s tutorial…. This is for fun, not intended or meant for anything negative, illegal or unsafe. Helping WA State to find fraud tax dollars and meet nice people along the way.🄳
18
108
335
12,914
Font sizes different on the words for the upcoming initiative ballots? Benefiting the far left, crazy how that just accidentally happens. Thanks for finding Josh, and Rantz covering today. @jasonrantz
ā€œWe’ve learned that there was a slight variance between the font sizes in the ā€˜for’ and ā€˜against’ sections of an initiative in the voter pamphlet PDF previously provided online,ā€ Thank you @jasonrantz for chasing this down. @secstatewa - it’s odd finding out about this from the media when I’ve been asking through my office since last week how you’ll proceed. Do you think that sort of partisan head-in-sand behavior keeps you from performing your job impartially?
2
54
BREAKING: I investigated SOMALI DAYCARES in the Seattle metro and uncovered over $5 MILLION of potential misuse of taxpayer funds. When I knocked on doors, no one answered. Neighbors told me they have never seen any kids! These individual daycares are receiving $40,000 - $70,000 per month.
The Post Millennial
1,935
14,905
62,750
4,013,969
Don’t forget the racist money democrats give to certain skin pigmentation.
Somali daycare fraud, waste, and abuse is still happening in WA. Trust me, it’s being investigated. I’ll leave it at that.
40
12thman4Life retweeted
Replying to @thehoffather
Absolutely… The I-2066 failure could end with the same result. Apparently, 4 subjects were included in the initiative… After a few minutes using Grok Maybe those generating initiatives should use AI before launching a failure…? Asked Grok for remedy… Split I-2066 into 4 short measures, each with one subject and a matching title: 1. Require gas utilities and city gas systems to serve customers who request it. 2. Bar the UTC from approving rate/plans that force or price out gas service. 3. Stop the state energy code from banning or penalizing gas appliances. 4. Stop cities, counties, and air agencies from banning or penalizing gas use. One question per measure. Don’t bundle utility law, building codes, local preemption, and the Decarbonization Act in the same initiative. That’s what the court said lacked ā€œrational unity.ā€
1
1
78
12thman4Life retweeted
Replying to @BrandiKruse
We have a huge opportunity to vote for constitutional judges in November. Don’t sit back and watch. It’s our time to do something about it.
32
125
519
7,294
I feel so bad for anyone in Washington State who relies on natural gas for their home or business! The Supreme Court and democrat leaders in our state don’t care what people vote for. People voted to keep natural gas, yet democrats didn’t agree with them, so they got their Supreme Court to overturn the initiative. Where’s all those NO KINGS protesters now? Just chirps…
1
1
35
Don’t EVER trust the democrats that run our state. They only want complete control of power and everyone to stand in line with their crazy ideology. Boys can never be girls you psychopaths.
The No side didn’t just write a bad argument. They wrote a lie into the voters’ pamphlet. Future expansions ā€œwould be decided on the ballot.ā€ That’s not how this tax works. The Legislature can lower the $1 million line the same way it created the tax: simple majority, Governor’s signature. Voters get a say this once because an initiative forced the question. And now the official PDF makes the against column darker and taller than the for column. Olympia wrote the tax. Olympia wrote the brochure. Then Olympia stacked the page. Read the statute. Don’t trust the pamphlet. Vote YES on I-645.
1
3
62
Retired people shouldn’t have to pay property taxes. They definitely don’t deserve for the democrats to steal their retirement money! Stop voting ā€œBlueā€ no matter who. It’s no longer the democratic party that you use to agree with and support.
Warning TLDR - Your Retirement Money has a Bullseye on it Not Only Did Olympia Change the Law to Tax Your Retirement Account, But They Also Rewrote The Law So They Can Seize Your Retirement Money If You Don't Pay Your Taxes Washington's new unconstitutional income tax bill (ESSB 6346) didn't just decide your pension/retirement check is now "income." It went into the old laws that said the state CANNOT tax your retirement money AND CANNOT seize it — and it deleted both protections. On purpose. Section by section. With Public Union support The Actual Language (sample below is just one of the 11 pensions targeted) Original Language teachers' pension fund (TRS), RCW 41.32.052. Subsection (1) says your pension is exempt from state tax and "shall not be subject to execution, garnishment, attachment... or other process of law whatsoever." Subsection (4), added this year: "Subsection (1) of this section does not exempt any pension or other benefit received under this chapter from tax under Title 82A RCW." (The new income tax) Translation: never mind all that. Not for this unconstitutional income tax. And they didn't stop at teachers. They went down the list and did it to every plan: • School employees (SERS) • Teachers (TRS) • Cops and firefighters (LEOFF) • Volunteer firefighters • State employees (PERS) • Judges, troopers, the whole roster • Don’t worry they also can attack your 401(k) and IRA too (RCW 6.15.020). Jamie Pedersen and Bob Ferguson have a checklist with every fat juicy retirement account singled out For context: federal law (ERISA) generally keeps creditors' hands off your 401(k) — exceptions basically boil down to divorce, child support, and the IRS. Most states with an income tax just tax the check and leave the seizure protections alone. Washington did both. They made the pension taxable AND took the lock off the door. Guess who's bankrolling the campaign to keep this law? The very unions whose members are sitting in these pension/retirement plans. Per PDC filings : • WEA — $2,000,000 • SEIU — $1,900,000 • WFSE — $1,000,000 • AFSME - $500,000 • NEA - $436,000 Teachers' union money, defending the law that put teachers' pensions on the collection list. WEA celebrated signing it. I'd love to see that internal memo. Oh wait….maybe they forgot to tell their members… who get screwed by the unions themselves take in more state money. Sources: ESSB 6346 / 2026 c 238 § 808 (and parallel sections for other plans); RCW 41.35.100, 41.32.052, 41.26.053, 6.15.020, 82.32.210/220/235; PDC No on I-645 contribution filings.
3
3
54
Democrat leaders in our state are the ONLY ones to blame for everything wrong in our state!
More thoughts on the (de) presser today Arsonists at the "competitiveness" presser Gregoire hosts a press conference on how WA can be "competitive" again. Standing next to her: the two legislators (Pedersen, Dhingra) whose income tax and spending are why we're not competitive. Then Pedersen threatens microsoft with a payroll tax if voters dare repeal the unconstitutional income tax….
2
3
64
šŸ“šŸšØATTN: WA State #6 #FRAUDofTheDay 9/15/26 🚨 Stephen Miller says "the scale of welfare fraud is SO MASSIVE that eliminating it alone could balance the ENTIRE federal budget." šŸ‘‰šŸ¾ Look around at Costco, your neighborhood, cars next to you in traffic.
Whiplash437
26
202
582
12,629
12thman4Life retweeted
10/10 shirt
264
5,045
48,321
339,856
My dog barks and chases the deer every day. They still don’t care🤣
1
6
50