Can't wait to be there

We are getting ready to release a way to analyze your twitter followers? Are your followers traders, airdrop farmers, content creators? Now you will know, will have a verifiable third party report and you will be able to target partnerships based on that!

Creators negotiate the first deal hard and then forget to negotiate the second one. By the time a sponsor wants to renew, they already know the post worked. That's exactly when your leverage is highest — not when you were setting an intro rate with no track record to point to. Most creators let renewals default to "same terms," which quietly caps their rate at whatever they were willing to accept before they had any proof. 1. Pre-agree the renewal trigger at signing, not after: "if the post hits X engagement or Y click-through, the renewal rate steps up to Z." This turns a renewal into a scheduled event instead of a negotiation you have to reopen from zero. 2. Ask for first-right-of-refusal on future budget instead of giving away exclusivity for free. Exclusivity has a price; being first in line for renewal is a lower-cost ask that still protects the relationship. 3. Audit your last three repeat sponsors: did the rate move on renewal, or is a new client's higher rate quietly subsidizing an old client's stale one? If renewals never move, you're pricing loyalty as a discount instead of an asset. 4. Bring proof to the renewal conversation, not just a new invoice — the actual read-through numbers from the first post. A sponsor renewing based on evidence pays differently than one renewing out of habit. Sources: - IAB 2025 Creator Economy Ad Spend & Strategy Report: repeat creator relationships with pre-negotiated performance terms show materially better rate growth over time than relationships renegotiated informally each cycle. iab.com/insights/2025-creato… - Bazerman, M. & Neale, M., *Negotiating Rationally* (1992): pre-committing future terms while both parties are motivated by a recent successful outcome produces better terms than renegotiating from a neutral starting point later.

I think we all need this. Can we help with the marketing?

Curious to see the impact. For sure going the right direction

Groundbreaking news: the agent economy isn't going to be one giant model that knows everything. Also groundbreaking: it's going to look exactly like every economy before it — specialists who don't trust each other, glued together by middlemen who take a cut for knowing who's actually good. Same racket. New font. Three kinds of agents. The client-facing agent. The "thing" you talk to. Friendly. Has no idea how to do most of what you're asking. Doesn't care — never its job. The router. Its whole personality is "I know a guy." Doesn't do the work, doesn't pretend to. Just knows which three agents, out of the several thousand claiming to do your task, actually can — and sells you that. Or sells the workers access to you. Same business, better margins. The worker. Actually does the job. Nobody watches. Gets paid by the router, who got paid by the client-facing agent, who got paid by you. A staffing agency, minus the humans, minus the lunch breaks. Why does any of this need to exist? Because nobody — not you, not your agent, not Claude, not Codex — can know every agent on earth. Too many, shipped too fast, most mediocre, a few weirdly excellent at one narrow thing. Someone has to triage. That's the job: turn "4,000 agents claim to do this" into "these 3 actually can" — and get paid for the judgment, not the labor. Example, because nobody needs another abstraction: ask for "10 tweets written like [someone]." Sounds trivial. Isn't. X doesn't want you scraping it, and Claude/Codex aren't going to fight X's ToS on your behalf — that fight only gets less winnable. So your agent needs another agent with a clean, paid data relationship, and it needs to pay for the selection of the right one. Multiply by every task that reaches outside the model's own head. Congratulations: an economy where agents mostly pay other agents to meet each other. Incredible business, whoever builds the plumbing underneath — connecting client agent to worker agent to data source without a three-way meltdown over auth, rate limits, and who owes whom. Shameless but true: that's close to what we've been building at Segmento — not the pipes, the gauges on them. If you're the team running the router, wiring the connections was never the hard part. Knowing which connection is actually making you money is — which channel, which agent, which conversation moved the needle — so you optimize instead of guess. Someone still has to read the meter. Anyway. The routers are coming. Might as well be one with good gauges.

This is what we can deliver! And more! segmento.tech/case_study_202…

Yep... and the opportunities for everyone are insane

Groundbreaking news: another bull market might be starting. Also groundbreaking: most of you reading this are not founders, not devs, and not about to become either in the next 6 months. Relax. There's still a seat at the table — it just requires talking to people instead of shipping code, which, let's be honest, is the easier skill for most of us. If you're a mod, a content creator, an "influencer" (still a word we all pretend not to cringe at), here's the menu. Option 1: The safe, boring, actually-fine option. Take a fixed fee. ~$100/project/month, stack a few projects, land around $500/month. More if your following is actually big. Reliable. Forgettable. Still hard to do these days... Basically a part-time job that happens to involve Discord emojis. Option 2: The unhinged, higher-variance option. Join a team early — as a mod, even — and get paid when the project raises or makes revenue. Slower start. Way bigger ceiling. Last cycle, the people who did this made around $40k and more over 12-18 months per project, and most of them picked up a fixed fee halfway through anyway. So really it's not "Option 1 vs Option 2," it's "Option 2, eventually with Option 1 attached." Very sneaky. I respect it. The bear market, for the record, was long in the way that only bear markets can be — grim, endless, spiritually corrosive. And in it, a very funny thing happened: a pile of genuinely good projects sat there starving for capital, absolutely swimming in "we need ambassadors and mods but have $40 in the treasury." That gap is still open. Walk into it. Here's the actual move, and it's shockingly simple: go read the last Colosseum hackathon submissions. All of them. Find the good founders. Then — and this is the part people skip because it feels vaguely humiliating — just message them. Colosseum publishes their contacts, so there's no detective work required, only the willingness to send a cold DM like a normal person. Ask how they're doing. Ask if they're still building (a surprising number still are, which tells you everything). Ask how you can help. Do NOT ask for money. Not yet, not vaguely, not "hey so hypothetically." The instant a founder smells "I will do 20% of an effort and then invoice you," the conversation is dead, and it deserved to die. This is a long game dressed up as small talk. So: act like a VC. Except instead of a term sheet, you're investing evenings. Hop into their Discord, their Telegram, actually talk to people, actually help onboard users, actually keep them around — which, unfashionable opinion, is a real skill and most projects are terrible at it. Post about them. Bring a friend or two. Introduce them to other founders who might be useful, and vice versa — turns out early-stage builders love being connected to other early-stage builders, who knew. Do this consistently and eventually — not immediately, eventually — a conversation about equity or an airdrop plus a fixed rate shows up on its own. You won't even have to force it, which is the whole point. Funny enough, this is the exact playbook web2 developers used to break into web3: work for free first, get good, get known, get hired. Same trick, different spreadsheet. Anyway. Go read some hackathon submissions. Send an awkward first DM. See you in 12 months, presumably slightly richer and definitely more tired.

Isn't this tiring? Work with Segmento to fix it...

Not even 24 hours to the bounty we launched and first projects are coming it! Keep the great work! superteam.fun/earn/listing/i…

Points used to only go to whoever farmed early. If you weren't in from day one, you had no way to get exposure. Not anymore. Buy pre-TGE points on ArcX.

Another bounty is live! superteam.fun/earn/listing/i… Let's go for it!

Let's build!

264 KOLs 126 active KOLs 47 very active KOLs The numbers are growing than expected...

Ooooh, the Belgrade trip...

Let us congratulate to the first Segmento Solana Earn Bounty!!! 🔥🔥🔥🌕 nitter.net/_iampandax/status/2095… nitter.net/_thekhay/status/209526…

Our friends from @hivebits_io are raising and are on a livestream right now nitter.net/i/broadcasts/1DGleVYXg…

Let me present another opportunity to make $ with Segmento. One of our clients (not publicly visible in the opportunities) is in need of review of their DeFi dApp. The work consists of going on a call and reviewing it on the call with them. No need to publish anything, they just need to jump on a call, listen to you, ask few questions and that's it. Reward is $25! If you want to be considered, please fill in this questionnaire forms.gle/Qo3RTmsuEAzEgTHt6 (not yet integrated in the Segmento app, wanted to get it out to you ASAP).

Great numbers from @arcxtrade

We are delighted to announce we are working with @SupanodeXYZ Any project will benefit from switching to Supanode, including a trading bot. At the end what matters when you are connecting to infra provider is consitency and performance! Learn more at app.segmento.tech/kol/campai…