reminder the question "what is a woman?" is one that is not being asked in good faith or its being asked form a position of ignorance i assume the later before the former.
"what is a woman?" is being asked as if its a simple question, when in reality it is a complex one.
Three years ago, terrorists carried out the deadliest attack on the Jewish people since the Holocaust. Hamas murdered innocent men, women, and children.
The response in Gaza? Cheering in the streets.
HORRIFIC.
so in your opinion we should arrest every christain in the us for the crimes of the kkk right?
you would be fine with iran or afghan attacking and genociding the us simply for the war crimes of the us leaders and millitary right?
cause thats how it works right?
-_-
1: this video is not from oct7th, that attack happened at 6am, it wouldnt be midday
2: how about israel mass murdering tens of thousands of innocent men, women, and children?
Performative and offensive nonsense from Oxford Council, who for all their posturing, will have to simply follow the law, regardless of their disdain for the rights of women and girls.
Get with the programme chaps - it's 2026. The law is clarified. Women have rights. Deal with it.
dailymail.com/news/article-1…
what law? no law has been passed that makes what they are doing illegal.
and oxford is infact correct, the single-gender spaces debate is manufactured outrage.
There's no basis for a discrimination claim here, there is no law that says trans women aren't women or that they can women's spaces.
None at all.
Oxford Council have done absolutely nothing wrong & all transphobes can do is stamp their feet & throw a wobbler like a toddler.
Performative and offensive nonsense from Oxford Council, who for all their posturing, will have to simply follow the law, regardless of their disdain for the rights of women and girls.
Get with the programme chaps - it's 2026. The law is clarified. Women have rights. Deal with it.
dailymail.com/news/article-1…
"JK Rowling in new social media war of words with trans activists in after locker room rapes
The Harry Potter author came out with some classic comments during the row, telling one X user that he should get 'his hard drive checked' and declaring: 'Campaign for third spaces if you want. Women's spaces are taken'" scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/n…
🚨for @10DowningStreet
"The Scottish govt dropped a previous attempt to introduce a “conversion therapy” bill when the full extent of its impact was exposed...
Burnham has the advantage of seeing the warning before the fire starts.
He'd be wise to heed it"
scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/c…
reminder the question "what is a woman?" is one that is not being asked in good faith or its being asked form a position of ignorance i assume the later before the former.
"what is a woman?" is being asked as if its a simple question, when in reality it is a complex one.
Dear @NadiaWhittomeMP Trans ideology is misogynistic b/c it promotes the abolition of women as a sex class. Trans ideology embraces narrow gender stereotypes, telling us that a man who embraces those stereotypes is a woman. Trans ideology is homophobic b/c it characterizes sex-based attraction as bigotry.
Why do you keep defending an ideology that is clearly regressive and indefensible?
this runs on two ontological and unproven assumptions
1: that trans women are men.
2: that trans women whom are lesbians are straight.
what you are doing is motivated reasoning.
also you didnt address my other arguments, can i assume you agree with them?
There seems to be a PATTERN…
Uvalde Shooter - Trans
Denver Shooter - Trans
Georgia Shooter - Trans
Nashville Shooter - Trans
Colorado Shooter - Trans
Aberdeen Shooter - Trans
Minnesota Shooter - Trans
Philadelphia Shooter - Trans
Canadian School Shooter -Trans
but straight up, when you said this i smiled ina sad way, i shouldnt be sad that you agreed.
i think the algorithm broke me abit, and i processed your concession as suspicion and than realized that it just good faith.
thank you.
yes i agree, which is why saying 5 trans people represents the whole group is actually insane.
we dont say that all christians are racists just cause the KKK were racist christians.
we dont say all germans are nazis just cause the nazis were german.
my argument is less about whether or not bad people can be trans.
and more about trying to take the fact that in a group some can be trans and transposing that onto the population as a whole.
Sounds like an admission that you want to coerce people's speech in your absence. If I were talking to you, the pronouns I'd use would of course be you/your/yours; what I say when you're not there doesn't concern you - unless you're a narcissist.
In that situation, there's no need to use 'their' pronouns - unless of course, they've put something in place of 'you' and 'your'.
If they're not there, then third-party pronouns will be called for, and I'll use the correct ones.
this isnt about reality, this is about how you choose to treat people.
i dont believe christians are speaking about reality, but i will talk to them respectfully, i will still defend them when they are attacked.
You can't have women's rights without trans rights.
You can't have feminism without trans people.
Transphobes fall for ultra conservatives who try to portray bioessentialism as an immutable fact and call those who break their reproduction roles "delusional" and "dangerous."