A stupid argument that completely evades the point in case, typical roman tactic is to deflect. You cant argue with the Scripture so you redirect, boring. Away with thee. Pagan.

Read the Bible. Mary sinned. Get over it.

You should study Scripture more.

Scripture: "This is my Body" "Who's sins you forgive are forgiven" "Man is justified by works" "Faith without charity is nothing" "I will give you the keys to the kingdom" "Baptism now saves you" "Obey your religious leaders" Prots: Did God really say that?

Either 'all' includes Jesus or 'all' permits exceptions

If we interpret the Bible as you did just there, than you create a whole bunch of contradictions and that’s what makes you dangerous. 𝙃𝙚𝙗𝙧𝙚𝙬𝙨 9:27 “𝙄𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙢𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙞𝙚 𝙤𝙣𝙘𝙚” If we interpret how you did just now, than this passage is a contradiction because Elijah and Enoch didn’t die once, they didn’t die at all. Lazarus was raised to life and so he died twice. In the same way, in Romans 3:23, ‘all have sinned..’ but Babies who die from abortion never committed a sin. These statements are general statements, but not literal to every single individual since for some, this doesn’t apply to them.

Luther disagreed. He prayed the rosary. Was he wrong?

Why would she need a savior if she never was guilty of anything?

"Everybody hates tapioca pudding, and I can't find anyone who eats it." Claiming that "all" in the verse leaves no room for exceptions is silly. Why? Because here are the exceptions: -Christ Himself never sinned. -Unborn babies, newborns, and infants don't commit personal sin. Christ gave Himself to the Cross, having never sinned; babies who die without committing personal sin wouldn't be a contradiction of Rom 3:23 but rather would demonstrate that the language isn't an exhaustive numerical claim.

Romans is speaking against the Judaiser heretics who claimed that as new Christians, one must also follow the law of Moses. Paul asserts this is wrong. Practicing the Law was done in anticipation of the Messiah. Practicing after the Messiah had come was proclaiming a falsehood. The Jewish Law doesn't save, and practicing it as Christians doesn't indemnify you from sin anymore than the Jews who practiced it before Jesus came. "All have sinned" and are in need of a savior, both Jews and gentiles and anyone who brinks the Law is necessary for salvation. That's Paul's argument. He isn't granularly declaring who is sinful. Notice Paul is writing about actual sin, but original sin. Therefore, children have not sinned. Adults who lack the capacity to sin, haven't sinned. Those are exceptions. And of course, Jesus hasn't sinned. That's three exceptions for which Paul offered no provisos. He didn't, because none were necessary. He isn't writing about individual sinners. Protestants who use this for that purpose are misappropriating the text.

All doesn't always mean All. Hebrews 9:27 says And just as it is appointed for men to die once, and after that comes judgment. But, Lazerus died twice. Enoch didn't die at all. So obviously scripture permits exceptions to the word "all".

Exactly!! Mary herself sings in the book of Luke 1:47 my spirit rejoices in God my Savior!! She wouldnt need a savior if she was sinless! Catholics dont READ!!

Yes she sinned. She was human

Nice verse fragment. Dear diary: today I learned miscarriages results in the damnation of unborn children since they have sinned.

So by your logic, if that applied to all people. Jesus sinned as well??

Nah Mary was sinless. Romans 3:23 isn’t an exceptionless statement about every individual human being. Unless you think Christ sinned, you already recognize exceptions to “all.” The question isn’t whether exceptions exist, but whether Mary is one of them. That’s the actual argument.

Does “all” include Jesus? He was a human as well as God. Or is this a broad statement meant to be taken generally about humanity which may have exceptions not elaborated upon?

Explain Job 14:4

Mas é justamente por isso que eles detestam a Palavra de Deus. Ela destrói todos os dogmas dessa seita maldita.

The issue with that argument is your misunderstanding of what Catholics mean by sinless. She wasn’t sinless of her own grace or divinity like y’all seem to believe we think. She was saved before she fell. God cannot dwell in corrupt places and she carried God made flesh.

Does all include Jesus?

All? Including Christ?

Mary chose not to commit any personal sins. She still had a sinful nature that required a Savior, which was her Son.

"and to offer the sacrifice specified in the Law of the Lord: “A pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons.”" "But if she cannot afford a lamb, she shall bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons,a one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering." If you don't sin and even claim that you cant- why the hell are you making sin offerings?

By your erroneous reading taking one line out of context and ignoring the rest of scripture, then Christ sinned. By what authority do you put forth an erroneous interpretation? Who are you but a sinful, fallible human being?

So Jesus sinned ?

Do some Biology research… she was carrying the egg that is Jesus Christ from her Mother’s Womb. She was with him beneath the cross had contact with his Precious Blood. This Woman is Differwnt than all the others.

You have been refuted on this countlessly

Mary was made necessary for our salvation. God fullfiled her with all grace that made her all pure and always vrigin. That sad, She is the next best thing to help make us saints.

i suppose the babies in your wife’s womb had sinned too.

So God came into the world through sin? Silly heretic.

Name one of her sins to us then