• Filmmaker & Financial Planner to entertainment professionals navigating career breakthroughs • Writer-Director (Hulu, Lifetime, REELZ) • Get my book ↓

1/ For years I’ve written here anonymously as TrendingValue. That anonymity let me learn in public and speak freely about money and investing. But today I’m stepping out from behind the handle. And sharing a personal reason why.
10
5
68
22,024
Long shot but here goes: I’m directing a short film about maternity leave discrimination. Not-For-Profit. Los Angeles. Early December. I’m in search of a tech/Silicon Valley-looking office space. Anyone have connections? 2-day shoot, one of those days can be a Sunday.
2
1
2
1,079
I am so tired of reading AI generated content. I can’t tell immediately and it shuts my brain off. Anyone else?
2
11
551
You know this was not ai generated b/c I have a typo. Can**
124
Shana Tova, finX.
4
453
Drew Feldman, APMA® retweeted
Anthropic: We are going to kill you OpenAI: We are going to kill you first Apple: now you can fold iPhone
160
4,122
55,843
1,037,639
Hey San Francisco (or Los Angeles). I'm directing (and wrote) a short film about maternity leave discrimination. We'll be shooting week of December 7th. Amazing team behind it. I need an office location that feels TECH. It's a not-for-profit film. Looking for donated / inexpensive space. DMs are open!
1
255
It's all about cost per unit of value, folks.
If you have a “very affordable” tax pro (CPA/EA) then you might have a tax problem. Client paying $500 for an S-Corp tax return and $250 for bookkeeping/payroll; got hit with a $800,000 TFRP 🤐
1
684
Time for advisors to focus on the qualitative aspects of planning. It’s one of the reasons I’m pursuing the CFT™️ after the CFP®️
BREAKING: Altruist announces a new AI powered financial planning agent. businesswire.com/news/home/2…
3
453
Great post! We call it personal finance for a reason :)
Do not switch to an S-corp because of a Twitter post with a referral link. I used to think becoming an S corp was what you had to do because of the sheer amount of people online who talked about. Then I started Sam’s List and ended up talking to 1,000+ accountants and financial advisors. Turns out: no. It is not that simple. An S corp can make a ton of sense for one person and be completely wrong for someone else. You can end up spending MORE money if you make the wrong decision. I almost switched a couple of years ago and thankfully my accountant shut it down for a number of reasons because it didn’t make sense for my business at that time and it would have cost me more money than saving. That’s why an actual accountant should look at your numbers and your situation before you decide. Saying “you NEED to do this” followed by a referral link to the company selling the solution. I’m not anti affiliate links. But your tax structure, accountant, financial advisor, company’s finances? That is where incentives matter a lot more. And this is exactly why Sam’s List was built the way it was. When you take our quiz, we do NOT match you with whoever will pay us the most. There is no firm bidding for your lead. There is no commission waiting for us if you sign. There is no affiliate link attached to your match. We score your answers against the firms available on Sam’s List and show you the options that fit what you told us you need. If you hire one of them, Sam’s List gets $0 from that decision. If we had built this around referral fees, commissions, affiliate links and taking 10–20% of the first year contract every time someone signed with a firm, we would no joke probably be 10x the size we are right now. We intentionally didn’t. Because I never want someone asking: “Did Sam’s List show me this firm because they’re actually a good fit for me, or because Sam’s List makes more money if I choose them?” This tweet is basically reason #8477283738 why Sam’s List exists. Don’t be the person who makes a financial decision because of an affiliate link. (No shade to this person. Not a personal attack 🫶)
365
I did like to always believe Vanguard was Altruistic.
6
542
It may sound crazy, I know, but the financial planning industry is so generous. In Hollywood, if I wanted to meet with somebody of 'note', I needed three direct connections and an intro from a lawyer/agent. I'd be lucky to get 15 minutes. In financial planning, all it takes is one e-mail or a DM and I'm able to pick the brains of the best thinkers in the industry.
3
1
10
1,424
Cool news and a first in my career as a financial planner: quoted in US News & World Report today on what they're calling the "Double RMD Trap" TLDR: delaying your first RMD to April 1 means two withdrawals taxed in the same year. So, probably not worthwhile for most, but I highlight a few scenarios where it may make sense: money.usnews.com/money/retir… Thank you Kate Stalter, CFP® for including me!
3
7
757
I’ve been a fanboy of Avantis since, basically, their inception. So when Eduardo Repetto agreed to hangout with me at the Avantis HQ, you can imagine my excitement. You’d think, after years fluent in “factor”-speak language like “loadings”, “premiums”, “tilts”, I’d have heard it all. But there’s a power to in-the-flesh conversation that can drive points home in a deeper, fresher way than even the best podcast or paper. For me, today, that was Eduardo’s focus on first principles of valuation. Simply: what am I paying today and what cash flows do I expect in return? As advisors, we spend so much time in the weeds of numbers, theory, research, news that it’s easy to lose sight of what we’re actually buying. And it’s even easier to overcomplicate it for our clients. In the Jewish world, the mark of a great teacher, is the ability to distill complexity. Well, I saw it today in one of the great investment Rebbes of our time. Huge thank you to Leigh Jedeikin, CFP® for arranging the time in their busy schedules (if you haven’t been following they’re growing like gangbusters!) Oh, and everyone wish Leigh a Happy Birthday!
8
41
3,034
Love confirmation bias
New Post: AI should assist advisors, but AI is NOT a fiduciary alphaarchitect.com/llm-fiduc…
1
520
I can’t tell you how difficult it has been to navigate “Hollywood” as an observant Jew, both keeping kosher and not working from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday. I’ve lost out on significant film and TV opportunities because of my observance, including scheduling conflicts with Shabbat and major Jewish holidays. In many ways, the financial planning industry has been a huge breath of fresh air. I especially want to shout out @BrettDankoCFP and team for going out of their way to accommodate my schedule and dietary needs so I can make the most of their Live Review program in the coming months. The generosity of Danko and so many others (you know who you are) on this journey has meant a lot. It has also meaningfully increased my odds of passing the CFP® exam and showing up for current and future clients with more knowledge, confidence, and care.
2
1
12
1,277
I’ll just leave this here. Agree 100000%
3 main reasons I do not like SEPs: 1. Lower contribution limits since you can just do the employer side contributions. This means no $24,500 employee contribution and no $8,000 catch up contribution 2. No mega backdoor Roth: solo allows this to get to $72,000 or 100% of income 3. Triggers the pro rata rule so you cannot do backdoor Roth IRAs Solo 401(k)s or Traditional 401(k)s > SEP IRAs
1
717
I think the government should provide the same 250K/500K exclusion if you’ve hung on to trend following funds for at least 2 of the last 5 years.
1
8
808
Bingo!!
Choosing a financial advisor based on some version of the sales pitch “I can get you access to ____ product” is a little like choosing a physician based on them pitching you access to “____ medicine” Every good advisor has access to everything Don’t fall for the marketing
3
964
Your weekly reminder that dividends are forced sales (and in taxable accounts forced tax hit). If you want “income”, you can make it yourself via strategically planned long term cap gains. If you want the value-y part of “dividend stocks”, there are better ways to target value.
1
2
6
997