I was walking through the halls of Congress with U.S. Senator Ron Wyden. We were talking about corruption when he pointed down the hallway toward a room and said, if you’re looking for the heart of government corruption, it’s right in there. He was pointing to the room where, as he described it to me, the tax favors were sold.
The tax code is the moral code, and every day it’s for sale to the highest bidder.
The legal expression of what a society wants more of and what it wants less of is for sale.
The law that determines what work gets done, where investment goes, and how people spend the finite hours of their lives is not decided by debate or morals, but by who can pay to get favorable rules.
A clean tax code would start by deciding what kinds of human activity a society wants more of – not who can pay the most to rig it.
Doctors, nurses, teachers, EMTs and other people whose work directly strengthens human life would pay almost nothing.
Creative work, athletics, hospitality, travel, food, art, scientific research and productive technology would be taxed lightly because they increase human health, knowledge, experience, creativity and connection.
Then taxes would rise as social value falls and social cost rises. Businesses built around phone, drug or gambling addiction and extraction would be at the top of the scale.
The rates and categories are what politicians would argue about as part of a continuing debate over what our society values.
Public tax debates begin with the wrong question: who has the money?
That is the wrong frame.
The first question is: What do we want to encourage or discourage for work and investment in our society?
The second is: What state is the money in?
Right now, we favor asset owners over active-income earners. We tax human effort heavily while allowing accumulated capital far greater freedom to compound. Ironically, that principle is antithetical to the premise of America itself: that anyone can change the circumstances of their life through creativity, intelligence and effort.
The second principle is simple: money generated by human work should be taxed last, while capital that has become large enough to compound on itself should be taxed first unless it is put back into productive use.
That is the key distinction.
Invest accumulated capital in hospitals, medicine, education, science, food, housing, infrastructure, art, sport, hospitality, travel or useful technology and the tax falls dramatically.
Let it sit in a self-compounding pool whose primary function is generating more capital, as it finances monopoly, extraction and social harm, and the tax rises.
The point is not redistribution.
The point is circulation.
Every tax is a moral choice.
The only serious question is whether the code reflects the kind of society we actually want to build.
Subscribe:
dylanratigan.substack.com