Charlie was betrayed by everyone, but @RealCandaceO He knew.

Are we still talking about the midterms????

Transforming rural health care starts long before a patient walks through hospital doors. Because of President @realDonaldTrump, @SecKennedy, and @DrOz, these RHTP grants will strengthen rural health care from the ground up for Arkansas families and communities.

Live look at TPUSA headquarters ahead of Candace’s emergency broadcast:

At what point does lobbying for a foreign country become something Americans should know more about under FARA? Because what AIPAC did after one congressional vote deserves scrutiny. And we should be paying attention to the politicians who are ignoring this, because they too look like foreign agents. On July 15, the House voted on Thomas Massie’s amendment to eliminate $3.3 billion in U.S. security assistance to Israel. It failed 104–314 103 Democrats and Massie voted yes. That made their sugar daddy, AIPAC mad. Because within days, AIPAC removed the donation links for 15 endorsed House Democrats who voted to cut the aid. These weren't obscure backbenchers. The group included House Democratic Whip Katherine Clark, the No. 2 House Democrat, along with lawmakers who had previously benefited from substantial pro-Israel political support. One vote involving aid to Israel, and the fundraising buttons disappeared. And AIPAC publicly made its position on that vote unmistakable, saying it was “disappointed” in the 103 Democrats who voted with Massie. Until 2021, AIPAC had never directly donated to a federal candidate. It created AIPAC PAC in late 2021 and launched its super PAC, United Democracy Project, for the 2022 cycle. By 2026, those two political operations had already poured more than $104.3 MILLION into federal elections, with months still left before Election Day. And look at what happened to the one Republican who voted for the amendment. Thomas Massie. AIPAC's super PAC had already spent millions opposing him in his Republican primary, which he lost in May. Then Massie introduced H.R. 8809, the “Americans Insist on Political Agent Clarity Act.” His bill would broaden FARA by establishing additional criteria for determining when U.S.-based organizations advancing foreign interests must register. It has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee. And that brings me back to the question: If an American lobbying organization can raise enormous sums for members of Congress, spend more than $100 million influencing federal elections, advocate intensely for U.S. policy benefiting Israel, and shut off fundraising access after lawmakers vote against aid to Israel, where should the legal line be? AIPAC says its work strengthens the U.S.-Israel relationship and advances American national security. Its critics argue this level of electoral involvement demands greater foreign-influence transparency. Congress now has an actual bill in front of it that would change that line. Maybe Americans should start paying attention to where the line is drawn because it's clear that AIPAC is sending us a message that they are in control of our politicians.

The community note here is GLORIOUS. X has spoken.

FORBIDDEN STUDIOS PRESENTS: THE INTERVIEW Political commentary has never had this much chemistry.

I've fully arrived at the belief that Trump’s first term, AND BUTLER, was a psyop designed to build a base of supporters who would blindly follow him and comply with whatever he said and did during his second term, which was to aid and benefit Israel. At this point, nothing he could say or do will ever change my mind. It was never about making America great again. It was to aid Israel's plan to take over the world.