Been seeing this type of post a lot the past two days, and I don’t get it. The way it’s phrased as if somehow big law firms are more at risk than small ones seems silly to me.
Let’s be brutally honest here, there isn’t a single lawyer that can confidently say they know what our jobs will look like in 10 years. There’s too much in flux. Most of us are fairly confident we will have a job, but what it will look like, how it gets done, and how we charge for it are still pretty up in the air long-term. And that presents just as much, if not more risk, to small firms as it does large.
If AI really cuts into BigLaw revenues, where do you think they’ll go for clients? They’ll leverage AI to offer more competitive pricing to a broader range of clients. And all of a sudden these ex-BigLaw boutiques will be competing with the very firms they built their resumes on.
Weil’s story is a great reminder to live within your means, plan for the future, and that nothing is certain. But I don’t think it’s a condemnation of BigLaw as a whole. In many ways, even the associates now jobless from Weil are still in a better position than their peers at small firms.
I would be *extremely* nervous this morning if I woke up as an associate at a big prestigious firm with a big salary, lifestyle, and family, but with debt and little visibility into what’s really going on and limited exit options to sustain my lifestyle.