That TPUSA employees are retweeting this and think this is some sort of sick burn and a winning point tells me just how out of touch they are with reality.
I actually appreciate the troll "TLHb6bh" (if that is your real name) for clipping this and nicely archiving an important part of the development of my investigation into who killed Charlie Kirk, how, and why.
That some washed up former radio host and small podcaster would accumulate tens of millions of views investigating what happened to Charlie Kirk speaks volumes about the importance of the investigation TPUSA employees desperately want to bury. This is especially true when you consider the TPUSA staff, including the ones who retweeted this, appear to show zero concern with finding out who killed Charlie Kirk, how, and why. They dismiss every person trying to find out the answers to those questions as evil or motivated by greed (also known as evil).
It never dawns on them that people want to know those answers. They seem mystified by people wanting to know those answers. They try in vain to stifle anyone trying to find those answers.
I came to this as a concerned American citizen who doesn't want public figures assassinated in broad daylight. I sent my research to several established podcasters to see if they'd do the story, and I only decided to do it myself when they didn't respond to my emails.
So, yes, I want to run down every lead, turn over every stone, and ask every question that could lead to an answer. How much more should Charlie Kirk's former employees and supposed friends want the same?
And for some weird reason, those who were closest to Charlie, including TPUSA employees, have no interest in doing the same.
I'm sorry. They just don't. It's true, and it's obvious to everyone that it's true.
They'd rather slander and label as evil those pursuing what they should be pursuing.
So, by all means, keep clipping archived videos. I'm proud of every word in them.
I deny your baseless allegations, of course. But you know they're baseless. The reason you gish gallop so many of them in there is so they can't be refuted individually, so I'll deny them all as a whole.
But thank you. Genuinely, thank you for taking the time to point out that some people actually still care who killed Charlie Kirk, how, and why. And thank you dearly for contrasting it so starkly with those at TPUSA who do not.
What do you mean that you had shut down your podcast and gone private shortly before Charlie’s assassination? What do you mean that you never watched one episode of Charlie’s podcast? What do you mean that if someone had asked you a week prior to Charlie’s death how you felt about him, you would have said, “eh, you could take him or leave him… he wasn’t a saint, he wasn’t god”?
You’ve spent the last 7 months making money off a man you openly admit you didn’t really care about. You had shut down your podcast and gone private, but then Charlie is assassinated and suddenly you care? Suddenly you become one of the loudest voices in the room?
The truth is you saw an opportunity to capitalize on a man’s death and you took it.
Then you pushed wild conspiracies and attacked his widow for a man that, by your own words, you could “take or leave.” You piled on and encouraged attacks against Erika. You demanded alibis for accusations you created out of thin air, while at the same time saying Tyler Robinson doesn’t have to prove anything and that the burden is on the prosecution to prove the case against him.
So which is it?
Because according to you, Tyler deserves the presumption of innocence, but Erika has to prove hers to the internet mob you helped create.
You weaponized speculation, outrage, and social media for clicks and money. You turned a tragedy into entertainment. You helped spread harassment and suspicion toward a grieving widow while pretending to stand for truth and justice. But “eh’ you could take him or leave him”, right?
You’re a reprobate, Baron Coleman.