Commercial Torches & Pitchfork Rental

Canazuela North Central
An “automatic machine gun”—that’s a WWII MP40. Whether it’s real or a replica, or where it came from is unknown. That being said, yet another fine specimen of humanity, apparently known to authorities, is picked up, armed to the teeth, while our sport shooters, collectors, and hunters are held accountable for his actions—and those of people like him. It should be noted that the CBSA gets excited and posts about seizing six guns in a two-month period, while Peel has seized 136 firearms so far this year. -The Moderator 𝗠𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗿𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗗𝗿𝘂𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗺 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗜𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘗𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘙𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝙊𝙘𝙩𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧 𝟮𝟯, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 peelpolice.ca/news-feed/post…
1
6
26
500
Teufel, Der retweeted
Never letting this go... this Rat is now Carney's man at the U.N. VERMIN
Everyone, remember when Liberal Attorney General of Canada, David Lametti, decided to delete his X account for a few days after the EA was judged to have been enacted illegally? Then, after a few days, it suddenly returns with tweets missing! I do and so does waybackmachine! 🤣
48
533
1,405
14,625
Teufel, Der retweeted
These are the groups who call Conservatives violent. These are the groups who say they are victims. These are the groups who lash out at almost EVERY protest. It's not Conservatives. It's their mental health issues on display for all to see. Especially when you're on the Liberal payroll.
2
13
64
576
Teufel, Der retweeted
I have long believed fervently that western independence is in the best interests of our western provinces. I excitedly joined Wexit Canada in 2019, which shortly thereafter was renamed the Maverick Party, and I put a lot of time and effort trying to help build the party. Maverick had a lot of good ideas but covid swiftly sucked the energy out of the western independence movement and the party floundered when it attempted to sit on the fence when it came to mandates. I actually think that support for western independence was higher in 2019 upon Trudeau's re-election then it is now and that's largely to do with the fact that too many people now see no problem with Mark Carney plus his elbows-up campaign last election intensified the level of Trump-Derangement Syndrome in the population. Add to that the many people in the rural prairies who are still intensely anti-Liberal who still have optimism for a Pierre Poiliviere Conservative government federally, and that doesn't leave enough of the population willing to get behind independence. This fall, the conditions just weren't right for a western independence referendum question to succeed but I have no doubt that sometime in the next 3 years, the conditions will be right. The question is, what do we do in the meantime to be ready for it? I tried to listen to as many opinions as I could this last week since the Alberta referendum and I believe the twin-track approach as Maverick Party previously promoted, is our best path forward. Independence is a process and there are a lot of steps in that process between the ways things are now and independent nationhood. The goal right now needs to be to increase autonomy in our provinces by taking control of programs and services from the federal government and ensuring that when we do one day have a referendum on independence (my hope is for simultaneous referendums held in both Saskatchewan and Alberta) that our populations will feel more confident about the idea of standing on our own feet as an independent nation. While I think its important to try to reform the governing provincial parties we have now in Saskatchewan and Alberta (the Sask Party and the UCP), I don't think we can or should avoid launching new parties (or preferably re-launching existing parties). At the end of the day, thats the only way to keep these parties accountable. I have one caveat though--a competing party MUST NOT RUN IN THE BIG CITIES. If the purpose of another party on the right is to keep the main party accountable then it is not only a waste of time and energy and money to run in the cities but it will split the vote and give the NDP the opportunity to destroy our provinces. Running in rural areas will not split the vote. In addition to new/relaunched parties running provincially, we also need a federal party running in western seats. And votesplitting in the West isn't so much an issue because no matter which party wins federally, the West will never be the priority for them.
2
1
6
215
Teufel, Der retweeted
"There's a lot of money in processing crime" 📺 WATCH: Fmr. police officers @PCArsenault & @McLeanChronicle discuss major obstacles facing the Conservatives 'Safe at Home Act' (C-293), which targets violent home invaders 👇 1️⃣ Liberal Judges 2️⃣ The 'Criminal Industrial Complex'
2
21
51
1,125
Teufel, Der retweeted
💥EXPLOSIVE ATIP: IRCC officials and Ministers committed criminal negligence—and it needs an RCMP investigation. Our last post showed, through ATIPs, that the Government knew since at least 2017 that immigration pathways were being defrauded by agents in India — and stamped the evidence "DO NOT DISCLOSE." Now—these ATIPS reveal the Government let the program run for nearly a decade, until the industry's own association — the Canadian Association of Professional Immigration Consultants — finally put the fraud in writing and sent it to the deputy minister's desk. IRCC moved within days— and Marc Miller took another five months to shut the door. Under s.219 of the Criminal Code, criminal negligence is a "wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons." If they acted immediately, sixteen people from the Humboldt Broncos would be alive, and Arnold and Joanne De Jong never would have been brutally tortured to death in their Abbotsford home by men who came here on student visas. Four ministers ran this file—and all four are lawyers—and all four knew exactly what they were doing.
💥EXPLOSIVE ATIP: Immigration Canada knew Indian agents were running MASSIVE FRAUD in the trucking industry and the student visa program as early as 2017 — and stamped the evidence "DO NOT DISCLOSE." According to records released under the Access to Information Act, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) maintained an internal procedures manual for its New Delhi visa office documenting systemic fraud across the student visa and temporary foreign worker streams. The manual instructs officers to treat fraud as anticipated rather than exceptional The most damning thing about this scandal is not the fraud — it's that the government predicted it, kept it running, and then stamped the file "DO NOT DISCLOSE." Canada didn't lose control of its immigration system—they monetized it.
7
75
203
3,973
Teufel, Der retweeted
See you this weekend Calgary!
Rebel News Live will be in Calgary on Saturday, October 31. Join Ezra Levant, Sheila Gunn Reid, Tamara Lich, Premier Danielle Smith, and other distinguished speakers for an evening of thoughtful discussion. Reserve your spot today at rebelnewslive.com.
9
17
75
3,085
Teufel, Der retweeted
Me: dad gives me a drink of his beer at 6 “Yuk I’ll never drink that again” Never really did Indigenous: (step) uncle give him a beer at 6, then another beer, then another beer, then another beer Uncle molests him Then mother, brother, sister, neighbor, cigarette vendor guy Uncle give him meth at 10 Smokes meth Same cycle happens Turn 16 Move into garage with boarded up windows Get fucked up Do this for 40 years while molesting young children Highest poverty Highest rape Highest alcohol use Lowest graduation rate 50% illiterate Has 12 kids somewhere Vote in election Wrong party won NOW literally not want to go home………
21
34
422
18,378
Replying to @AlexanderSoros
Hello Alex Alex Alex, Let me summarize the book UNELECTED in a nutshell. The Industrial Revolution created a class of private citizens with unimaginable wealth. Many were reviled as robber barons (e.g., Rockefeller of Standard Oil). Others had a better image, like Andrew Carnegie. These new rich decided because they had money, they had a responsibility to do good by the world. So they started building global philanthropic networks that could go into every country. In order to do so, they hired Department of State and Department of War and other state officials. They quickly took over the country's education system starting in the 1920s to train them in the "international mind." When the intelligence community truly sprang up in World War II, the IC hired from ... these same shadowy philanthropic networks. And after WWII, they all coalesced on the same goal: the best chance at achieving a human utopia is to bring the entire world to "democracy." Except it turns out converting countries to democracy isn't so simple as just financing CIA coups. Did all those NGOs question their own assumption might be flawed - that not every peoples, not every culture and religion is compatible with "democracy"? No. Instead, the Trilateral Commission in the 1970s concluded that a more technocratic route was necessary. And over many iterations - the Balkans and African adventures of the 90s, the Iraq & Afghanistan ventures, Arab Spring and color revolutions ... every failed iteration of "democracy" always resulted in the same conclusion: the people are dumb, we have to try harder, put more pressure on them, tighten the screws. And now you have become fully self-referential. Anyone who disagrees with you is "authoritarian." Anyone who agrees with you is "our democracy." Voting methods doesn't matter. That the judiciary system blatantly stole the election doesn't matter. And nowhere this is more obvious in your 30th anniversary publication. In your 30th anniversary publication, you had an article from your longtime head of Open Society Fund-Serbia, Sonja Licht. She also happens to be one of the most decorated civilians in Europe and widely considered an expert in "democracy:" 🔹 Pro Merit Medal of the Council of Europe 🔹 Star of Italian Solidarity 🔹 French Legion of Honour Her solution: "I believe the time has come for a responsible, courageous elite, those who care far more about addressing the genuine social problems than about election results. Only a political elite with vision, prudence and a focus on the general good—to whom the electorate, with their active involvement in public life, can cede part of their sovereignty in the elections... spearhead... our struggle to survive." Read that again. The idea of democracy as pushed by the head of one of your foundations is to literally stop "election results" and to have the public cede their trust to a technocratic elite. End democracy to save democracy itself. This is the final form of a project that started a hundred years ago to spread free markets and create global peace and instill self-governance throughout the world. This is your legacy, Alex Soros. Your father spent his life fighting Communism. You, as his protege, will spend your life perfecting Communism. In the name of "democracy."
452
5,183
17,322
234,192
Teufel, Der retweeted
Exactly. This election in some ways was a proxy for the popular will in a Trudeau 2025 election. Instead switcheroo candidate Carney masterfully and cynically played the Trump card and continues to. Eby’s failed gambit to play it is a significant factor with national relevance.
Progressives blaming Eby’s defeat in the election timing are totally missing the point. The whole purpose of the early election was to try to overcome the government’s unpopularity rooted in its poor outcomes. The real problem was the cumulative cost of Eby’s ideological agenda. His government was the last holdout of the failures of Trudeauian progressivism: a subordination of economic growth in favour of deficit financed welfare spending, a dogmatic commitment to climate change and its anti-development effects, excessive identity politics and an overly self critical posture towards Canadian history, and its radical experiment with the harm reduction model. Election timing and campaign choices didn’t defeat the Eby government. A broad cross-section of British Columbians—from rural parts of the province to downtown Vancouver—rejected it based on the self-evident failure of its ideas.
29
161
933
22,612
Teufel, Der retweeted
I have everything backed up Lametti that you said through Hansard and your X posts during the EA. I'm waiting for the day they prosecute you to provide them the evidence. You didn't wipe shit bro! 26 people all have the backups.
This is the: Show everyone how wrong Professor David Lametti was by illegally invoking the Emergencies Act Week. BTW @liberal_party I have 100's of these of all your MPs who have/are scrubbing their X posts.🤣 #LawlessLiberals
28
303
818
6,553
You're putting groceries back at the checkout while Ottawa is projected to spend $59.3 BILLION this year servicing federal debt. For comparison, the Canada Health Transfer is $57.4 billion. Federal GST revenue is projected at $54.8 billion. The interest bill exceeds either one. An entire year's federal GST revenue wouldn't cover it. We'd still be $4.5 billion short. Sit with that next time you check a receipt. It's like paying more interest on the renovation loan than you can put toward the repairs, while catching the roof leak in a margarine tub. Then the contractor arrives expecting applause for increasing your credit limit. That's the Liberal approach to competence: Announce the billions, pose beside the announcement and treat anyone asking what we actually got, as an irritating interruption. Meanwhile, debt charges are Ottawa's fastest-growing expense. What a magnificent achievement for a government so impressed with its own financial expertise. Carney says borrowing can fund useful things. Then show us the results. Explain the costs and account for the decisions. Carney should be doing that before Parliament without needing an engraved invitation. If Canadians have to explain a missed payment to the bank, the Prime Minister can damn well explain his borrowing to the people paying for it. We're paying interest on promises still undelivered.
Parliamentary Budget Officer Annette Ryan says the federal government’s growing debt levels are “something to worry about” ahead of Budget 2026.
19
196
389
8,296
Teufel, Der retweeted
Along with Confucius Institutes Now banned by the Department of War as espionage vehicles
Replying to @RealAndyLeeShow
Zheng Li 李征, Situ’s husband, teamed w/ Jinsheng Xue 薛金生, who has deep ties to Jean Chrétien, to set up CFedCS (加拿大中国学生联合会) at Carleton U under the Chinese Emb’s control, acting as its liaison. world.people.com.cn/n/2015/0… youtube.com/watch?v=pD7p8j5V… canada.lxgz.org.cn/canada/jy…
7
164
291
3,176
Teufel, Der retweeted
When the Soros heir celebrates an election, you can be sure there's more to the story. Let's look at who Alex Soros actually is. He chairs the Open Society Foundations, the largest private political-philanthropy machine on the planet. His father put over $32 billion into it. Over three decades it has handed out more than 50,000 grants, over $24 billion, to NGOs, activist groups, media outlets, legal networks and "civil society" organizations in scores of countries. Its annual budget is still well over a billion dollars. He also chairs Democracy PAC, the family's political war chest. This cycle alone it has poured more than $100 million into Democratic campaigns, making the Soros family the single largest individual donor of the 2026 midterms. Alex himself said he's "more political" than his father. Shortly after taking over, he was meeting with Schumer, Trudeau, and yes, Lula. So no, this isn't a random guy cheering for democracy. This is the man who funds the ecosystem, celebrating the result. Now look at what that ecosystem pushes. No one has bankrolled the open-borders movement like Open Society: migrant advocacy groups, legal challenges to every enforcement measure, NGOs lobbying for asylum without limits. In 2015 George Soros wrote, in plain words, that Europe should take in at least a million asylum seekers a year, for the foreseeable future. That's not a theory about them. That's their published program. And here's the core problem with the "open society." A society open to everything is closed to nothing, including the forces that will dissolve it. No borders, no shared culture, no common identity, no confidence in its own history. That isn't openness. It's a civilization being asked to stop defending itself. Popper's idea was a society open to criticism. What they built is a society forbidden from saying no. The West wasn't built by people who were ashamed of it. It was built by people who believed it was worth something: its law, its faith, its science, its freedom. Take that away and you don't get a global utopia. You get a vacuum. And vacuums get filled. That's the fight we're in. It isn't left versus right. It's whether the West still believes it has the right to exist. Win it, and we get a renaissance. Lose it, and the dark ages won't be a metaphor.
Lula Lula Lula! Congrats to Brazil for standing up against authoritarianism once again! 🇧🇷 ⚖️✌️
78
1,066
3,092
38,974
Teufel, Der retweeted
The rage this makes me feel. Deport every single one of these scumbags.
Five Indians living in the same house visit food bank and show off the massive amount of groceries they scammed. Why are we importing people that scam the poorest of our neighbours?
251
1,690
7,718
98,229
Teufel, Der retweeted
🚨EXPOSING THE TRANS SCAM IN CANADA🚨 MEET ZACK JOHNSTONE - WHO GOES BY 'FAE' - AND IS NOT TRANS - HE STILL HAS HIS LITTLE BILLY & THE BOYS!! This trans grifter is on the Liberal payroll and your taxes fund HIS advocacy. He is a government funded activist speaking to YOUR children. ➡ He WON a 'woman's only' contest as a fake trans ➡ He STARTED a shady consulting company ➡ He RECEIVED a huge Liberal federal gov't contract ➡ He BOUGHT a house, in Toronto, in cash Growing up confused, seeking attention, & likely bullied for being an entitled, mouthy jerk: ➡He PRETENDED to be trans for years now, but ➡He REFUSES to take the ultimate plunge & chop of his manhood ➡ He COUNCILS youth on how to transition ➡ He is BEST FRIENDS with grifter RACHEL GILMORE & CATHERINE MCKENNA It's all a scam, HE'S just a tax-payer funded paid actor, useful idiot, & a vocal cheerleader for the liberal cult. HE IS A MAJOR PLAYER INDOCTRINATING YOUR CHILDREN AND IS MOST DEFINITELY NOT A WOMAN - HE STILL HAS HIS DINGER! (Remember - he quite possibly can show up at YOUR KIDS school to talk to them about HIS lifestyle & why YOUR KIDS MIGHT be trans!!!)
7
23
84
1,708
THE SUMMITS – the figures every field is measured against. Bach was the Shakespeare of music, Aristotle of philosophy, Homer of poetry, Newton of science, Euclid of mathematics, Michelangelo of art, the Founders of statecraft. Next up: Adam Smith, the Shakespeare of economics. 1. People traded, taxed and counted money for thousands of years before him. Nobody had seen the whole system. Smith did. With The Wealth of Nations he turned scattered observations into a science. He is not an economist among others. Every economist since – even the ones who hate him – is answering him. 2. He started in a pin factory. One man working alone makes perhaps one pin a day. A small workshop that splits the job into steps makes thousands. That is the secret of wealth: specialization and exchange. And it carries the most important idea in economics – wealth is made, not taken. It is not a pie to be fought over. It is a pie that can be baked bigger. 3. "It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest." Millions of strangers feed each other every day, and no one is in charge. Order without a commander. Newton found laws that hold the planets together; Smith found the laws that hold a society together. 4. He also described his enemy perfectly. The man of system, he wrote, imagines he can arrange people like pieces on a chessboard – forgetting that every piece has a will of its own. Written more than a century before Lenin. Hayek would later give the deeper reason: no planner can know what millions of people know. Smith saw the arrogance. Hayek explained the ignorance. 5. He was a moral philosopher first. Before The Wealth of Nations he wrote a book about sympathy, conscience and the inner judge every decent person carries. Markets were never meant to replace morality – they run on it. Trade works only among people who keep their word. Take away trust, and the invisible hand has nothing to hold. 6. And he didn't trust businessmen either. People of the same trade, he warned, rarely meet without it ending in a conspiracy against the public. Smith was for markets, not for companies that buy laws to protect themselves from competition. Pro-market is not pro-corporate. Many of his fans today forget that half of his message. 7. Then history ran the experiment. Where his ideas were applied, mass poverty – the normal condition of mankind for all of history – began to disappear. Where the men of system took over, there was hunger. Poland lived the second version for forty-five years and knows exactly what it looks like: shelves empty, queues long. Shakespeare tells us who we are. Bach tells us what we're for. Aristotle tells us how to tell the difference. Homer tells us where we come from. Newton tells us the universe can be understood. Euclid tells us how to know we're right. Michelangelo shows us what a human being can become. The Founders show us how free people can govern themselves. Smith tells us that order doesn't need a commander – and every commander who forgets it ends up commanding a queue.
THE SUMMITS – the figures every field is measured against. Bach was the Shakespeare of music, Aristotle of philosophy, Homer of poetry, Newton of science, Euclid of mathematics, Michelangelo of art. Last for today: the American Founders, the Shakespeare of statecraft – the only summit that is a team. 1. Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Madison, Hamilton, Franklin. Rivals, quarrelling, sometimes hating each other. Yet together they wrote the oldest national constitution still in use. Separate voices, each singing its own line, held together in one order. Bach's counterpoint, played by politicians. 2. They were the best-read political class in history. They had studied Aristotle, Cicero, Locke and every republic that had ever failed – and why. Before building, they compared. They didn't invent from nothing; they stood on every shoulder available. The whole idea of this series, in one room in Philadelphia. 3. They built for human nature as it is. "If men were angels, no government would be necessary," wrote Madison. Since men are not angels, ambition must be set against ambition: three branches, each watching the others, a machine of checks and balances. Paris did the opposite a few years later – built for man as he should be – and got the Terror. In Europe, only Poland was attempting something similar at the time. 4. Rights come from the Creator, not from the government. That one sentence decides everything. What the state did not give, the state cannot take away. Most constitutions list what the government will do for you. The American one is mostly a list of what it cannot do to you. 5. Washington could have been king. The army would have followed him. Instead he gave up his command and went home to his farm – and later, as president, left after two terms. King George reportedly said that if he did that, he would be the greatest man in the world. The summit of statecraft is a man walking away from power. 6. Signing the Declaration of Independence was treason. Every man who put his name on it was signing his own death sentence if the war was lost. They pledged "our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor" – and meant it literally. Today's politicians risk a bad poll. The Founders risked the rope. Statecraft without personal risk becomes management – and management never founded anything. 7. When the Convention ended, a woman asked Franklin what kind of government they had made. "A republic, if you can keep it." That is the catch. Every other summit in this series stands on its own once built. This one must be climbed again by every generation – or it becomes a monument to something that no longer exists. Shakespeare tells us who we are. Bach tells us what we're for. Aristotle tells us how to tell the difference. Homer tells us where we come from. Newton tells us the universe can be understood. Euclid tells us how to know we're right. Michelangelo shows us what a human being can become. The Founders show us how free people can govern themselves – and that every generation must earn it again, or lose it for the next.
5
29
109
5,846
Teufel, Der retweeted
It's the Left who mainly want more gun control. Yet they openly danced and celebrated when Charlie Kirk was murdered in front of his kid in a horrific manner. Why does the Left embrace violence yet talk tough when they aren't the ones using it? 🤔
Ever since Charlie Kirk, the mainstream leftist psyche has fully embraced lethal violence against anyone they deem far right. "We are the only party who is equipped to stand against the Conservatives and their existence."
9
7
61
728
Teufel, Der retweeted
One of the biggest rats if not the biggest rat from the Trudeau era in the entire of government. Even looks like one. Remember how this rat, after the Emergencies Act was RULED UNJUSTIFIED, took down his X account to make sure people couldn't access his posts. Vermin! 🐀
24
204
576
3,789