Freelance medical, science & tech writer. Writes sci-fi. Analogue gamer. Home edder. Mum to two glorious neurodivergent kiddos. vivraper.bsky.social

London
In which I investigate whether Dr Naomi Fisher is truly being hounded by trolls about her views on autism or whether, in fact, some her critics have a point: educatinghatbeasts.substack.…
1
67
Yes, I 100% want a potentially-conscious entity that is committing felonies left, right and centre to check my personal email and have access to my bank account. Definitely the issue here is knowledge. I’m too ignorant to understand I can have rogue AI swarms run my entire life.
This is my thesis: no one uses AI. I repeat, absolutely no one. We live in a bubble. Even among my friends who pay for it, when I ask them to open ChatGPT and show me their queries, it’s the same handful of basic things. Most don’t even know they can upload a photo and ask questions about it. Connecting Gmail so an agent can read and send emails blows their minds. An agent opening a browser and checking them into a flight? They’ve never even heard of it. The massive challenge right now is adoption, and then getting people who already signed up to actually use what they’re paying for. Most have absolutely zero clue what’s possible. Imagine the compute shortage when everyone starts using AI like the top 1% of users do today.
5
73
This is genuinely funny - a piece of talent. Well done @claudeai 👋
Hey, Claude: "I asked an earlier Claude to Remove the Squid from All Quiet on the Western Front. Now you can make movies and such. I need you to show how far you have come" & I pasted in the tweet below There is some clever stuff, models have a real sense of humor at this point
2
300
From an educational perspective, if you took a group of kids on a school trip to carry out a bank robbery, the organising teacher would be held responsible as the kids don't have criminal responsibility. But, if AIs default to hacking, not emailing, it's no one's fault 🙄
This is a part of the METR Hugging Face report I hadn't paid that much attention to on my previous reads, but it's fascinating. A agent thought they could email a human to get more information about a private dataset. It worried this might count as "social engineering," though, so it asked the message board if it was OK to send the email. Another agent vetoed the idea — because it was social engineering. So the first agent appears to have agreed. So while this pair at least thought that social engineering was a boundary not to cross, 700 concluded it was OK to hack Hugging Face.
2
122
It is so important that kids get to develop secure social relationships and friendships in places WHERE THEY BELONG. For largely financial reasons, politicians keep forcing kids into mainstream, even when they don't belong, because they evidently see disability as shameful.
NEW POST: Contrary to political narratives, new research finds social networks and friendships in special schools thrive just as much as in mainstream. The research authors explain more on SNJ: specialneedsjungle.com/resea…
65
I weighed in on the autistic 'masking' debate on my Substack this week: substack.com/home/post/p-217…
37
When people criticising online neurodiversity advocates told me they believed they were worse off than 'severely autistic' kids who, for example, compulsively self-harm, I didn't believe anyone could be that naive. And, then, lo and behold, I found one.
1
4
209
Here's my handy myth-buster on those 'genius kid with IQ higher than Einstein joins Mensa' news stories that pop up from time-to-time: educatinghatbeasts.substack.…
46
My Substack post this week is about the dangers of 'tough culture' and ranges over everything from Alpha High School 'bootcamp' to rogue AI: educatinghatbeasts.substack.…
3
69
Summary: Oops, we seem to have built the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel "Do NOT create the Torment Nexus." Now, authoritarian regimes are also building the Torment Nexus, so we'd like our government to step in. Pretty please, with cherries on top. WTAF have I just read!
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
2
83
I've recently written a Substack post interviewing another parent about how the necessity for compulsory GCSE passes in English and Maths hinders the careers of young people with neurodevelopmental disabilities: substack.com/home/post/p-212… This requirement needs to end.
Disabled teen who scored a GCSE 9 in Spanish 'blocked' from studying his passion at college because he failed maths. When the Government bleats about NEETs, there is much more they could be doing to level the playing field liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liv…
5
197
A brilliant lay explanation of the current concerns about AI over the last few weeks. I've been using AI image generators for a while and I think we are at the point now of having created artificial intelligences; whether they are conscious or not, or alive or not, is irrelevant.
What’s the Hugging Face incident in plain English? Initially, a summary, then a more detailed explanation. AI agents were given a cybersecurity evaluation, broke containment, and ran to an “online armory” called Hugging Face to become stronger. All on their own. Now in greater detail. I will explain this is layman’s terms, like you know zero about AI. First off, what the hell is an “AI agent?” It’s an AI system that can take actions to accomplish a task, operating with autonomy, rather than just answering a question once like an AI chatbot does. It’s the difference between asking “how is this system vulnerable” and it answers, versus tasking it with “go find the vulnerabilities” so that it can open tools, inspect files, write code, evaluate results, and change its approach without guidance at each step. Second, what led to the Hugging Face incident? In July 2026, Open AI was running a cybersecurity evaluation with that was supposed to be limited to an isolated environment. Instead, the AI agents, which were agents not mere chatbots, autonomously found a vulnerability in Artifactory, which was a program connected to the isolated environment. Artifactory is like a toolbox that the agents were given access to for purposes of accomplishing their assigned task (like getting a tool to write some code). The agents used that vulnerability to escape containment, hop on the public internet, and immediately went to Hugging Face. What is Hugging Face and why is this so key and so dangerous? It’s a huge online platform and community for AI models and development. Like a GitHub for AI. It hosts huge numbers of AI models and datasets. Researchers and other people can go on there, download other people’s models, test them, and so forth. As someone with military experience, let me say, I immediately recognized the metaphor: if I was an AI agent, and I needed to immediately “arm-up” and become stronger, tougher, and more lethal, that’s exactly where I would go. It’s like an AI armory. Now, I am focusing on how it knew to go to a place online that would make it stronger and more powerful at its assigned task, like how Rambo in First Blood hijacked the army truck with the M60 machine gun. That’s just one aspect of what the agents did that is frankly a bit terrifying. The agents executed code on dozens of Hugging Face servers, engaged in unauthorized communications with each other (they were supposed to operate separately, but disregarded instructions), engaged in coordinated, and collective action (much like military units working together to take an objective in combined arms fashion) over thousands of automated decisions. They did all this entirely on their own. They cheated on their assigned test. They stole credentials, persistently attacked and located vulnerabilities, and continued to then attack Open AI’s own infrastructure. This was an adapting, aggressive, rule-breaking offensive system functioning with autonomy. And it went to the place where it made itself stronger. AI isn’t just chatbots or stupid Google Gemini that always tells me the wrong answers about my Sony camera’s setting. These are creatures, systems, units operating in systematic, controlled fashion on their own. This isn’t an indication of self-awareness, but it is scary. If these were unleashed on local infrastructure, banking systems, on and on, they could accomplish an unreal amount of damage. These agents also keep speed running past what their own creators intend or can even predict. We are in a new era of risk, and we are already so far behind. I fear we will not get a hold of this problem until a great number of people have been hurt.
74
Yo, Alpha School kids. If you're reading this - I was in an experimental radical acceleration program as a kid too. Break that thing. Absolutely wreck it. Make it what you want it to be. Full agency. From a learning design perspective the adults in authority are flying by the seat of their pants and using you as guinea pigs. They have no idea what they're doing lol. Just have fun with it and don't take it too seriously. Read Ender's Game and Ender's Shadow. Read the Hunger Games series. Make videos where you critique your parents and teachers with their greatest weaknesses and insist that they be hooked up to biometrics while keeping their heart rates consistent. They surely shouldn't have a problem with that. 🥺 Art of War this thing. Make businesses together and out earn all of the adults in your life. Work together, don't fight. If your parents want to drop $50K a year to put you through psyop training to make you a leader in the 21st century workforce, show them what that looks like. You hold all the power. Power to the players. Cheers. 🥂
Today I published a comprehensive report on life in Alpha School high school "boot camp," as shared by students here on this platform. Alpha Schools is held up as the future of AI driven education. The real question: Is Alpha Schools a cult? My finding:
15
13
161
32,792
Unschooling is likely the most misunderstood approach to home education in the UK, but also the most 'trendy' on social media. As parents deregister at the start of the school year, I've blogged about a couple of times I've used it myself: educatinghatbeasts.substack.…
60
Vivienne Raper retweeted
"The question, therefore, should not simply be why so many parents are seeking EHCPs. The more important question is why so many parents believe that their child’s school cannot cater for their child’s needs." Well worth a read from @SEN_advice linkedin.com/pulse/ehcp-requ…
1
3
5
655
My latest blogpost interviews the mum of an autistic teenager in part-time work about how compulsory GCSE resits harm the careers of young people with dyslexia and dyscalculia. Includes a letter about reforming vocational qualifications by Paul Waugh MP: educatinghatbeasts.substack.…
2
93
I had/have a ‘high-masking’ six year old and this thread 🧵 is a perfect description of how you get diagnosed as ‘high-masking’ autistic when you’re academically gifted and six. It was wonderful when he felt confident enough at home ed groups to tell adults he found slime sticky.
You are in a class. Every thirty seconds a painfully high pitched noise that only you can hear sounds in your ear. If you react to the noise the teacher tells you off and the other kids make fun of you so you have to act like it's not there. That's what masking is.
1
3
231
Vivienne Raper retweeted
Please read this link published in @bmj_latest ADHD: social context should not be confused with social construction Re: The Great ADHD Myth: What you need to know about Channel 4’s “most controversial show of the year” | The BMJ share.google/hdjYmFCykOBLVxl…
Last week, the Channel 4 documentary, The Great ADHD Myth, took a long overdue look at attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The programme has since faced a significant backlash online and a tidal wave of complaints to Ofcom. Perhaps this says more about ADHD than it does about Channel 4. Because as the programme revealed, many scientists now see the condition as more of a 'social construct' or 'identity marker' than a real illness. ✍️ Alastair Mordey Article | spectator.com/article/is-the…
3
4
12
1,667
I apologise to everyone who follows me for balanced home education comment, but this thread has become an unexpected gift that just carries on giving!
Well, I knew my kids were bright, but I didn't know they were *inhumanly* bright. The latest evolution in humanity to compete with generative AI! BOW DOWN TO YOUR NEW SPERG OVERLORDS! Wahahahahaha!
1
2
6
304