🤣🤣🤣

Zia Yusuf Cut Off By Good Morning Britain After Dodging Questions On 'Racist' Tweet huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/g… via @HuffPostUKPol

Attacking the rule of law ? Defending a convicted kidnapper and knife-wielding grifter ? Is this what you should be doing as a sitting MP Bobby ? Absolute disgrace, you should resign immediately from @UKParliament. @HoCStandards #RobertJenrick #ReformUK

Why would anyone trust you ⤵️

So ridiculous it makes you wonder why @LBC and @ShelaghFogarty give him the time of day. If they must platform Reform why not discuss these subjects?

On the side of the working people? @reformparty_uk South Tyneside council closes 10 nurseries. #SouthTyneside #ReformUK

What’s the point of @reformparty_uk if they oppose nursery care provision? @reformexposed @WatchReform

Can't wait for all the reform usuals to try and bullshit their way around the @YouGov megapoll from this morning. Guess they are all waiting for instructions from the Grifter-In-Chief @Nigel_Farage first.

Time to resign @Nigel_Farage ?

Begging bowl already out :D

Same Day, Same Defence: Farage's Seven-Year-Old Response to Russia. On Tuesday night, at the UN General Assembly in New York, Andy Burnham told the world's governments that Russian agencies had forged the branding of 28 British organisations, including the BBC and British universities, tried to interfere in the 2019 general election, and now spend an estimated £1.3 billion a year manipulating the information British people see. He announced a new body to fight it: the National Centre for Information Defence, tasked, in his words, to "detect, attribute and disrupt these kinds of hostile state information attacks." By Wednesday afternoon, Nigel Farage had a different name for it. "Andy Burnham is setting up a Ministry of Truth to clamp down on free speech," he posted, alongside a video of himself warning of "disinformation." The post has been viewed over 220,000 times. There is nothing in Burnham's speech about clamping down on free speech. Read the transcript and the remit is narrow and specific: detecting and disrupting hostile state information operations, not policing what British citizens are allowed to say. Farage isn't disagreeing with the policy. He's describing a different policy that doesn't exist. It's a move he's made before, against an almost identical proposal. In 2019, the European Parliament voted to strengthen its own anti-disinformation unit in response to Russian interference. Farage's Brexit Party voted against it, and put out a statement that reads, today, like a first draft of Wednesdays tweet: "As a party of free speech, we oppose shutting down debate." Stories of Russian interference, the party said at the time, had been "exposed as baseless propaganda and scare stories used to shut down debate." Seven years, two countries, and two different governments later, it's the same sentence with new nouns. An effort to counter Russian disinformation becomes an attack on British free speech, and the alleged interference itself gets waved away as invention. What's changed in those seven years is what happened to Nathan Gill. In 2025, the former leader of Reform UK Wales pleaded guilty to accepting bribes to make pro-Russian statements as a sitting MEP, work that included giving speeches favourable to Moscow in the European Parliament. He was sentenced to over ten years in prison. There is no evidence Farage knew, and no suggestion he was involved, the Met's own investigation found no link between the two men on this. But it means Farage's second dismissal of a Russian influence operation as a free speech panic comes after his own party already produced a proven case of exactly that kind of operation working. None of this proves Farage is compromised, and this piece doesn't claim that. What it shows is a pattern: when Britain or its allies move to counter Russian information operations, his instinct, twice now, seven years apart, is to call it censorship rather than engage with what's actually being proposed. Whether that's conviction or convenience is a question only he can answer. So far, he hasn't been asked it directly.

Cat check: The National Centre for Information Defence will be tasked with tackling Russian disinformation. It's unclear why Farage, whose former colleague Nathan Gill is currently in prison for accepting bribes to make pro-Russian statements, is against this.

The ex-Tory, suspended for racism, who used public funds to pay for NDAs to silence her staff when being investigate for falsifying expenses Another great pick by Reform UK!

With the news that Helen Jenner has been appointed @reformparty_uk Leader in Wales, let's not forget the moment Arron Banks made a hugely racist comment and she changed her view on whether to condemn him mid-interview when she found out @Nigel_Farage had condemned the comments.

Bobby really is the Alan Partridge of politics...

Reform UK Wales has had one hell of a week. Dan Thomas resigned as leader after being reported to police on suspicion of assault and controlling or coercive behaviour. He was released without charge and denies wrongdoing. On the Senedd steps today, Farage said Thomas had "done a great job" and that he was "sorry for his personal difficulties." The same day Thomas quit, Reform MS Sarah Cooper-Lesadd defected to Plaid Cymru, saying the group had "no interest in the work I came here to do" and describing "a real appetite in the group to want the government to fail." Today Reform's Senedd Members voted for a new leader. Helen Jenner beat Jason O'Connell by 17 votes to 15. It's the second time O'Connell has missed out on the job, back in February Farage picked Thomas directly, no vote at all. Multiple sources close to the group are already saying they expect to be back here within six months. Not exactly the stable government in waiting Reform likes to claim it is.

Well Danny managed to stop at least ONE boat...

Absolutely horrific assault @RupertLowe10 🤣 ya fucking parsnip

As usual, more bullshit from poundland Adolf @RupertLowe10.

This you lad @RobertJenrick?