@SecRollins @americaunwon @caseymurph1
Keely, we went round and round a bit about current programs and you asked for solutions instead of just complaining.
I've been pondering it quite a bit and I initially put a list on the table, but it wasn't really a program, more just principle.
This one is a program.
Secretary Rollins, you already have the office that can run it. Casey, this second half is written with your ground in mind because a temporary stay on an eviction is not a program. You need a program that keeps cattle on the grass and still puts power on the fence.
Keely, critique away then once it meets with your approval, use that access to get it on a desk that can implement it.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: I would rather nobody got federal aid at all. But, if checks are going to be written anyway, write them so the machine stays in the county and the land stays in production.
Farm Aid That Stays on the Farm: Two Programs, One Office:
Small farms and ranches are getting squeezed from two directions: equipment we cannot afford, and solar farms that eat up ag land. Both have a fix. Both can run through the FSA county office that is already sitting in your county.
The equipment problem
A no-till drill runs $60,000 and up. A baler, skid steer, or sprayer is the same story. Most small operators cannot carry that note for a machine that sits in the shed 340 days a year. At present I'd like a T100 drone setup, a pasture aerator, better feeders without holes that have to be resealed continually with concrete around them, about three more wells, and 200 acres of hay ground with a baler that doesn't need new straps. All totaled that's easily $300k (not including the land) that isn't in the present budget, so we make do.
Now every rancher and farmer has tried lending to neighbors or borrowing. Inevitably what I borrow breaks before it hits the field and I eat a $5000 repair bill and never use it, or what I lend out comes back ungreased, run too hard, with something broken and nobody knowing how it happened or willing to pay for it. Do that a couple of times and you quit loaning AND quit borrowing. Repairs are what make sharing expensive. Abuse is what ends it.
Commercial rental yards are built for construction, they are often an hour or more away, delivery is a nightmare and you can't get on a schedule. Most real ag equipment is not on the lot.
The fix: Uber for farm equipment:
Get a low-interest FSA loan to buy the equipment. Enroll it and post the dates it is available, payments are deferred until first rental hits. Other producers book it through an app at a below-market rate. FSA handles delivery and pickup and inspects it both ways. Rental income pays your note. If rentals fall short, the program covers the gap.
GPS and hour meters track every hour. The program pays for wear from renters. You pay for your own use.
Clear damage gets charged to whoever caused it.
Renters get rated. Abuse the equipment and you lose access.
Once the note is paid off, keep it enrolled and your rental earnings build credit toward your next machine and/or towards your rental of the neighbors bulldozer or excavator for pond work, etc. Drones and specialty equipment go out with a licensed operator, like a real Uber, unless the rancher has his own license.
Owners get equipment that pays for itself without the repair fights. Young and small producers get machines they could never finance. Equipment that sits idle most of the year gets used across a whole county.
The solar problem:
Solar farms are taking productive ag land out of use, and rural communities are fighting them county by county. Casey’s family has run cattle on that Arizona ground since before it was a state. Once the panels go up in a solid block, the cattle and the operator are gone.
The fix: fence-line solar:
Vertical solar panels built into the fence lines. The rancher designs the paddock layout he actually wants and the solar company follows it to the T. The solar company builds the fences with panels in them, plus solar-powered wells, water points with shade structures, and maintenance lanes that double as cattle alleys and firebreaks.
Cattle keep grazing. The land stays in production.
Panels are built for cattle: heavy posts, panels mounted high or behind hot wire, armored cable. The developer gets comparable output spread over more ground.
This is the compromise I have been saying out loud for months. Animals get cover and the company puts in and maintains real fence and the roads. Lines run the fence instead of cutting the pasture in half. The lease follows the land and everybody can live with it. Granted, it costs more to install because it is not one big mass of panels, which is the only honest objection, and it is solvable.
Who gets paid:
On private land, solar income is split between the landowner and the operator under a fixed formula set by the program. The operator’s share follows whoever is actually working the land. On state land, the full operator share goes to the operator running it.
Making the numbers work:
Spreading panels across miles of fence costs more than packing them into one field. The program covers that difference: Developers get federal cost-share on the added racking and cable, plus a production bonus for fence-line systems. Utilities get federally funded interconnection and substation upgrades, and fence-line projects get priority in the interconnection queue. That is the biggest bottleneck in solar right now. Neighboring operations can sign up together to share collection lines to the nearest substation.
If USDA already finances rural renewable energy, stop financing the version that deletes the ranch. Pay the extra cost of the version that keeps the cattle.
One office:
Both programs run through the FSA county office. It already makes equipment loans. It is already in every farm county. It answers to county committees elected by local producers. USDA already finances rural renewable energy, so the money exists inside the same department. One door for the producer.
A lot of farm aid ends up with the biggest operations. These programs put it into equipment that serves an entire county and into land that stays in the hands of the people working it.
Keely, that is a solution. Secretary Rollins, you do not need a new agency to start a pilot. Casey, this is how you keep the herd on the grass instead of winning a month and losing the place.
If we are going to rebuild the herd and keep small outfits alive, stop writing programs for the corporate ag managers in the office and start writing them for the people who still have a seat in the saddle and tractor.