Rom Paul retweeted
Women are dishonest about this stuff because they’re programmed to be. Their greatest weapon is their sexuality, but they also face social backlash for being too overtly transactional with sex, so women embrace ambiguity where they’re able to use sex to their advantage while maintaining plausible deniability
Some examples:
-Wearing sexy is outfits isn’t for the male gaze or to flex on other women for status, it’s just to feel good about themselves apart from any social factors
-Dancing provocatively is not a sexual display, it’s just recreational fun
-Marrying a rich guy isn’t about the money, he’s a good guy who provides security for their family
-Wearing makeup and high heels to work isn’t to impress men and sway them, it’s just to feel confident
I want to address a tangent here, which is that women will argue that these things are not sexual displays, because they do them at social events that are exclusively other women. I reject that: it’s still an indirect sexual display for the purpose of status
Sexual attractiveness is perhaps the purest form of status that a human can possess. You’re desirable merely by your existence, you don’t even have to do anything. Women recognize this in each other and they will begrudgingly, although often subconsciously, recognize the status of other women who are more attractive (“ugh, she’s so hot, maybe I should set her up with one of my successful guy friends”). When women dress up for other women, they’re showing that they’ve got the goods to be a high status social ally. It’s a flex.
Back to the main point, which is that we subsume our sexual behavior beneath socially approved motives. The thing is, women often aren’t being duplicitous when they say these things: their minds have convinced them that it’s the truth
The human brain is incredible at rationalizing our baser desires. Men genuinely like sports. The reason we like them is probably because in our evolutionary environment, games like that prepared us for war. But men wouldn’t say they like sports because it’s preparation to kill the neighboring tribe; our brains simply find them fun. We enjoy doing adaptive things without consciously thinking about them
Women engage in sexual signaling and sexual competition without deliberately thinking about it, and that’s a superpower because they can be disingenuous without lying. Their brains have disguised their motivations even to themselves. They don’t know why they’re doing what they’re doing.
Women don’t want sexual behavior to be discussed explicitly, because it makes it more difficult for them to use it to their advantage. The ambiguity and optionality work to their advantage. If a hot guy hits on them, they can receive the advance. If an ugly guy hits on them, they can reject him and say they weren’t asking to be hit on. If one woman tries to slut shame another for an outfit that distracts men, the wearer can claim that she’s simply wearing something that’s comfortable and cute
Ironically, women also can’t acknowledge that this is why they’re upset, because the whole game is that they have to avoid discussing it directly and explicitly. That’s why all the outrage and criticism deflects from whether these outfits are overtly sexual (they obviously are), and turns it into jockeying over social status and norms where women try to make it verboten for men to even comment on it
Shane Gillis, by making a snarky comment, threatened women’s sexual power and sent their defense mechanisms into overdrive
I just don’t get why women are so dishonest. Like — just admit that you dress like that because you want people, especially men, to think that you’re hot. And by hot I mean sexually attractive. That’s why the shorts are short and tight and scrunch up around your butt to make your butt look bigger and rounder. Why? Because you think men like big round juicy butts. You wear low-cut tops because men find breasts attractive. Cut the bullshit that you do it just for you or that it’s more comfortable because you don’t and it’s not. Just freaking own it.
And if you are going to dress like that, don’t expect people not to look because that’s specifically why you chose the outfit you did. Furthermore, don’t get mad when people you don’t think are hot hit on you. You can’t have it both ways.
Aside from it being problematic for society and relationships between men and women, thing that frustrates me the most is the dishonesty in all of it. You know why you do it, we know why you do it. I am so tired of people expecting others not to be honest about things that are blatantly/obviously/objectively true.
87
292
3,483
169,224
I love Marty so much I don’t even care that he’s a Trumpanzee Zionist
Gamers are not woke.
We're frustrated with our games, our movies, and our comics being co-opted by left-wing politics.
They call us 'chuds' to demoralize us, but I say we take that label and use it for good.
Lets build a political movement to take back our games and our country.
2
67
Rom Paul retweeted
Never date or marry:
1. Nurses
2. Single mothers
3. Teachers
4. Party girls
5. Girls with tattoos
6. Liberals
7. Horse girls
8. Lawyers
9. Feminists
10. Girls from Miami
1,415
1,060
14,961
1,181,768
I take back everything negative I’ve ever said about Tracey
BREAKING: Confrontations as Cornell University "We are Jane Doe" Protesters face off with Michael Tracey in Ithaca, NY
Video by Jonathan Fernandes | Licensing @FreedomNTV Desk@freedomnews.tv
1
3
55
Rom Paul retweeted
I kissed a foid and I liked it. I hope my goy friend don't mind it.
36
847
17,034
149,366
Rom Paul retweeted
Если ты бьёшь жену каждый день, то у неё будет одно требование: «Пожалуйста, не бей меня».
Если ты не бьёшь свою жену, то у неё появляется целый список требований.
2,260
8,667
130,615
7,444,392
Mmmmmm holy based
GG frickin easy
I am getting lots of incoming questions about the public execution of Nidal Hasan, mostly because I have been outspoken on wanting public executions for over a decade.
My position is simple: Executions should be public and brutal, not private and medicalized. They are the ultimate example of the state's monopoly on violence, and the only way to keep that from running out of control is to confront voters with the trade they have made every single time, that they might have appropiate confidence or revulsion in the institution.
This is not new thinking. George Washington thought the same. The way we have shifted from hanging to firing squads to doctors quietly injecting chemicals that send our worst gently off to sleep is awful and dystopian, a total short-circuiting of important feedback mechanisms. It makes needless executions more likely, not less so. People who demean this as barbaric or yucky miss the whole point. It doesn't somehow become torture or inhumane (as the UN is suddenly claiming) just because we decline to hide the act behind a curtain.
And then there are those who suggest any revel in the death of those who truly deserve it is an indicator of a broken or diseased mind. To the contrary. It is normal, good, and aligned with our natural and national order. That it has not been done here in 60 years is an indictment in and of itself.
And that is without even getting into the fact that men were not hung for stealing horse, but that horses may not be stolen.
"I would to God that one of the most attrocious in each State was hung in Gibbets, up on a gallows five times as high as the one prepared by Haman. No punishment, in my opinion, is too great for the Man, who can build his greatness upon his Country’s ruin."
- George Washington, 1778
3
61
