Brazil's Treasury canceled this week's fixed-rate and inflation-linked auctions. When the issuer won't sell duration near 16%, that says more than the yield. Goldman's Sunday script had the long end +200bp. Monday: hold my caipirinha.

Be Barack Obama: - do nothing whole life - get installed as POTUS by far left globalist weirdos - ruin race relations, the military, and healthcare - blame everything on everyone else - PROFIT!

Under capitalism, you can spend your entire life publicly criticizing capitalism, writing books against it, and selling anti-capitalist merch for a profit. Under communism, writing a single private pamphlet criticizing the party gets you sent to a forced labor camp or put against a wall. The sheer tolerance of freedom vs. the fragile cowardice of tyranny.

Regardez bien ce qui s'est passé au Brésil dimanche. Les bureaux de vote ferment. Le dépouillement commence. Et là, un seul juge de la Cour suprême décide de prolonger le vote de deux heures, dans tout le pays. Le tribunal électoral suspend le comptage en urgence. Selon la presse brésilienne, ses propres membres étaient contre. Résultat : pour la première fois depuis le retour de la démocratie au Brésil, le candidat battu au premier tour remporte le second. Peut-être que tout est propre. Mais quand les règles d'un scrutin changent pendant le scrutin, sur décision d'un homme que personne n'a élu, la confiance meurt. Et une démocratie sans confiance n'est plus qu'un décor de théâtre. Maintenant, regardez qui applaudit. Alex Soros : « Félicitations au Brésil pour avoir, une fois de plus, tenu tête à l'autoritarisme. » Ursula von der Leyen : « La démocratie et le multilatéralisme ont gagné. » Pedro Sánchez, à un mois de ses propres élections, annonce que « la remontée mondiale du progressisme » va arriver en Espagne. Ils ne se cachent même plus. L'autoritarisme, c'est un peuple qui vote mal. La démocratie, c'est un juge qui garde les urnes ouvertes jusqu'à ce que le résultat soit le bon. Ils ont compris une chose : le réel est contre eux. L'immigration, l'insécurité, le déclassement, la dette. Le réel est trop fort, trop violent, et sur le terrain des idées, ils ne gagnent plus. Alors le combat se déplace : les tribunaux, les procédures, les horaires, les inéligibilités. En France, on connaît déjà la musique. On a déjà vu des juges décider de qui a le droit de se présenter. Le Brésil n'est pas une exception. C'est un prototype. Il y a de fortes chances que ce scénario se rejoue partout en Occident, dans chaque pays où ils n'ont pas encore perdu. Alors préparez-vous. Pas seulement à faire campagne : à protéger le scrutin. Des assesseurs dans chaque bureau. Des avocats prêts le soir même. Chaque règle connue par cœur. Chaque procès-verbal photographié. Gagner ne suffira pas. Il faudra gagner avec une marge qu'aucun juge ne pourra effacer, et surveiller chaque urne jusqu'au dernier bulletin. Le réel est de notre côté. Encore faut-il qu'on nous laisse le compter.

In my eyes, that we have been in a civilization war since the pandemic in 2020 , to wave our swords to fight against the DEI and progressive ideologies,

Everyone in Europe argues about the symptoms. Almost nobody looks at the plumbing: who funds the people who write the norms, litigate before the courts and set the boundaries of the debate. Take the best-documented case: the Open Society Foundations, created by George Soros. Over a billion dollars a year. Roughly $32 billion given away since 1984. Not a single voter ever approved one of those dollars. The model is simple and ruthless. You don't need to win an election. You fund NGOs, think tanks, legal clinics, university programs. They produce reports, train lawyers, run strategic litigation. And some of those people end up inside the institutions. Concrete example: the European Court of Human Rights. A 2020 report found that at least 22 of the 100 permanent judges between 2009 and 2019 came from seven NGOs that are highly active before that same Court. Open Society is the main one, and it funds the other six. The worst part: in 88 cases, 18 judges sat on the bench while the NGO they came from was the applicant, the representative or an intervening party. In any listed company, that's called a conflict of interest. None of this is illegal. That's exactly the hack. These institutions were designed to protect themselves from governments and parties. Nobody planned for a private actor funding the entire chain: the plaintiff, the expert, the lawyer, and sometimes yesterday's colleague who is now the judge. Same logic in Brussels: a dedicated policy advocacy institute, tens of millions flowing to NGOs at the heart of the EU, and Open Society among the largest private donors to the Council of Europe. And the money? Soros made his fortune speculating, most famously against the British pound in 1992. But let's be precise: the foundation doesn't make money, it spends it. The return isn't financial, it's normative. Shaping the rules is worth more than any dividend. So stop shouting "Soros" like an incantation. It gets engagement and changes nothing. The problem is structural: any billionaire, left or right, could do exactly the same thing tomorrow. Many already do. What we should demand is rules. Full transparency on the funding of NGOs that litigate before European courts and institutions. Public declarations of interest for judges. Automatic recusal. Traceability of foreign money in lobbying. Stop staring at the puppets. Look at the plumbing. Whoever funds the infrastructure of the debate always ends up writing its conclusions.

The peak of globalism was Obama and Macron. Two men, two continents, the same casting. Young, polished, brilliant speakers. Perfect résumés. Total ease in front of a camera. Able to electrify a rally in Ohio and charm a room full of CEOs in Davos in the same week. They are excellent actors. I mean that without irony. Public charisma is a real talent, and they have it at a rare level. But look at what they actually embodied. Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize nine months into his presidency. Before he had done anything. They weren't rewarding a record, they were rewarding an image: a post-national world run by institutions and experts. Macron is the European version of the same product. A movement founded one year before the election, no historic grassroots base, carried by the economic, media and administrative elites. "Neither left nor right." Translation: attached to no people and no history. Just the efficient management of globalization. Their whole software fit in one sentence: the global market, supranational institutions and experts know better than nations what is good for them. Unlimited free trade. Deindustrialization sold as modernization. Borders treated as an archaism. Sovereignty treated as populism. They weren't the architects of this project. They were its faces. The best salesmen it ever had. When you need millions of people to accept that their factory is moving to the other side of the world and that it's for their own good, you don't send a gray technocrat. You send someone who knows how to talk. That's why footage of Obama at a rally rings so hollow today. Same tone, same inflections, same staging. But the audience has changed. They've seen the movie. They know how it ends. And the project they carried is dying everywhere. The US is back to tariffs and reindustrialization. Europe is finally talking about energy, military and tech sovereignty. Borders are a legitimate topic again. Supply chains are coming home. Covid proved that a country that can't produce its own masks isn't modern. It's vulnerable. Macron is at 15% approval, his lowest since 2017. Obama is back on the rally circuit, and the magic is gone. But the most revealing part is what came after them. The system can no longer produce an Obama or a Macron. Nobody that charismatic, that polished, that smooth. There are two reasons for that. The first is arrogance. For fifteen years they won without really fighting. The media was on their side, the elites aligned, the opponent demonized in advance. When you win too easily, you get lazy. You stop caring about the casting. You stop working on the script. And it shows: less polished, less prepared, less credible. The second runs deeper. Truly brilliant people no longer want to enter this system. They know it has no future. Fifteen years ago, an ambitious young prodigy aimed for the elite schools, Harvard, high civil service, the big international institutions. Today they start a company, they build, they go where things are moving. Nobody signs up for a sinking ship. So look at the bench. In the US, they ran Biden. A president whose cognitive decline was obvious to everyone except his inner circle, who spent months hiding it. Then they swapped him out in a panic for Kamala Harris, who couldn't answer a simple question without drifting into word salad. After Obama, that's a staggering fall. In France, same movie. Attal is Macron on a photocopier. Same codes, same lines, none of the depth. He announced his presidential run from a village square in rural France to make people forget he's a pure product of Paris's wealthiest neighborhoods. Everyone sees the set. Nobody buys it. And on the left, the new great hope is Glucksmann. Son of a famous philosopher, Brussels MEP, darling of the Parisian salons. He talks about the nation and the working class with the polish of a dinner party in Saint-Germain-des-Prés. The words are right. The voice isn't. They all sound off. Like instruments out of tune. You still recognize the score, but nobody wants to listen to the concert anymore. That's the first sign of a dying system: it no longer attracts the best. All it has left are heirs and imitators. Charisma isn't enough when reality contradicts the story. What comes next won't necessarily be better. But it will be different: leaders judged by what they build, not by how well they tell it. The age of actors is over. Make way for the builders.

It’s Elon Musk VS George Soros

I’m so tired of people who don’t build talking about seizing companies and wealth from those who do. Democrats want to seize SpaceX because he’s a larger billionaire than all of their billionaires. They don’t like that he can outspend their billionaires.

Why are Democrats going after Elon Musk with everything they have? It's not because he's a billionaire in politics. They've been perfectly comfortable with billionaires in politics for decades. They're going after him because he's the first one playing against them. Look at the numbers. Soros's Democracy PAC had put over $100 million into this midterm cycle before the summer was even over. Only a tiny fraction of it shows up under his own name. Then add the advocacy arm of his foundations, which doesn't have to disclose all of its political spending. And that's just the visible part. Over 40 years, tens of billions have gone into NGOs, universities, legal networks and media projects that shape what counts as an "acceptable" opinion. That's the real game. Billionaires have been buying politicians for decades, on every side. But the smartest ones figured something out: you don't buy a candidate, you buy the ecosystem. Universities, foundations, newsrooms, NGOs, regulators, courts. Once you control who writes the reports, who trains the lawyers and who decides what counts as "misinformation", elections become a detail. For 30 years that ecosystem leaned one way. Nobody called it oligarchy. They called it "civil society." Then Musk showed up. He bought the main public square, took the filters off, and started spending in the open, under his own name. Yes, he's the biggest donor of these midterms. Everyone can see exactly how much he gave and to whom. That's the difference. One plays in daylight, the other plays through a maze of structures. And suddenly, billionaire money in politics became a threat to democracy. This isn't really about left versus right. It's about an ideology that captured these institutions and leads straight into a wall. More regulation, less building. More process, less progress. Countries shutting down working nuclear plants. A decade to approve a power line. A system whose default answer to any ambition is "no." Musk is the opposite. Reusable rockets. Mass-market EVs. Satellite internet for the whole planet. Brain-computer interfaces. A serious plan to make humanity multiplanetary. You can hate his tweets. You can't deny that no one in the last 20 years has pushed the frontier of what humanity can build further than he has. That's why they need to break him. Not because of his money. Because he proves the system can be bypassed. If we leave the system as it is, we don't get a catastrophe. We get something worse: slow, comfortable stagnation. A civilization that manages its own decline instead of building its future.

OBAMA: “Trump should be on HGTV … He's got the White House looking like Saddam Hussein opened a Cheesecake Factory.”

🚨 NOW: Elon Musk calls for PRISON for Robert Reich after Reich urged Democrats to "defund Musk" and SEIZE SpaceX and Starlink for the government ELON MUSK: "Stealing companies is a serious crime. Prison for Reich." 🔥 He’s going FIGHT BACK mode. REICH SAID THIS: "Democrats ought to be starting this — not just with oversight hearings, but also starting laying the groundwork for nationalizing Starlink and SpaceX. Nationalize it. It should be a public corporation!" "If the Democrats take over the House and possibly the Senate, one of the things they are going to be doing is focusing on Elon Musk. I mean, he's really going to be targeted and he knows it." Democrats aren’t even hiding their Soviet-style playbook anymore… They want to use a midterm majority to confiscate private American companies just because Elon backed Trump and gutted their USAID fraud fund! 😠 I AM WITH @ElonMusk 100% PERCENT, and we know TRUMP is too 👏🏻 Protect him AND his companies at all costs. h/t @CollinRugg

😃

Yes

The Legacy Media Lies. Here’s the “largely peaceful” protests

Yup

Long live Socialism 😱🤡

How comrade Slotkin became an insurrectionist.

55M views, and I’ll reach 1B views on X. I started this account 7 months ago. Just the beginning. The left has brainwashed a lot of people. The market for truth is huge.

Corrupt jihadist supports another corrupt jihadist. This is why Minnesota is a shithole. They have a Muslim Attorney General.