Starlinked Putin deserves a rod of tungsten from orbit. CCP nazis for hans. Progressives are the new nazis. youtu.be/SBEAu--7tdU Change my mind.

Kekistania
Yeah the OP is such a bitch he blocked me 😅
Replying to @So_u_believe
Ewww fucking Putin is a pedophile bitch.
5
What a putlerist idiot.
Nein. Hast du nicht. Den Krieg hat die NATO begonnen. Putin könnte - wenn die NATO sich aus Russlands Nachbarschaft verpisst. Aber der Westen und die NATO sind schuld, dass der Krieg nicht endet. Das stimmt.
21
Yes he can, putler cant.
📌 ZELENSKY CANNOT HIDE BEHIND THE WAR I am sick of hearing every criticism of Ukraine’s leadership dismissed as “Russian propaganda.” That is not an argument. It is an excuse to avoid discussing what the Ukrainian government has actually done. Russia did not write these laws. Russia did not suspend Ukraine’s elections. Russia did not establish the United News television marathon. Russia did not impose Ukraine’s mobilisation policies. Russia did not pass Ukraine’s legislation restricting organisations linked to the Moscow Patriarchate. Russia did not sign Ukraine’s presidential decrees. These decisions were made in Kyiv, under Zelensky’s leadership. And Zelensky should be held directly accountable for the government he leads. He cannot present himself to the world as the defender of democracy while expecting democratic scrutiny to stop at the door of his own administration. He cannot demand unlimited political support while treating criticism of his government as disinformation. He cannot take responsibility for Ukraine’s successes and then suddenly become an innocent bystander whenever his government’s actions become controversial. That is not leadership. That is political convenience. Zelensky has been president throughout these decisions. His government has restricted political opposition, restricted media, imposed mobilisation, pursued legislation against a Moscow-linked religious institution, and Ukraine remains without elections because martial law prohibits them. Whatever justification is offered for these measures, they are the responsibility of Ukraine’s leadership. And Zelensky cannot have it both ways. If he wants the world to believe that Ukraine is fighting to defend democracy, then his own government must be held to democratic standards. Democracy is not simply a slogan you use against Russia. It means accepting scrutiny, accountability, opposition and criticism when the criticism comes from your own citizens and from people outside Ukraine. The answer to uncomfortable facts cannot always be “Russia.” Russia did not pass the laws. Russia did not sign the decrees. Russia did not run the Ukrainian government. Zelensky did not inherit a responsibility-free presidency. He chose to lead, he continues to lead, and he must answer for the actions taken under his authority. The Ukrainian people deserve the truth about what their government is doing. And the rest of us have every right to question it. Zelensky is not above criticism. Ukraine’s government is not above scrutiny. And being at war does not place a president beyond accountability. SOURCES: zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/anot/… president.gov.ua/en/news/pre… president.gov.ua/en/presiden… president.gov.ua/documents/1… hrw.org/world-report/2025/co… hrw.org/news/2024/10/30/ukra… reuters.com/world/europe/put… reuters.com/world/can-ukrain…
38
as if surrendering doesnt mean the end of ukranians
Zelensky Has Blood on His Hands What you have done as Ukrainian president can never be justified. You have Ukrainian blood on your hands because you turned down every opportunity for a peace agreement. You are the weak one here, yet you continue pushing Ukraine toward more destruction. We all know your future will be bleak when this is over. For the sake of Ukrainian lives, and for whatever dignity you have left, do the right thing and end this war.
31
No cross bracing on the "legs" no wonder it fell.
Bei Arbeiten an der Ruhr-Sieg-Strecke in Kirchhundem ist ein 57 Meter langes Brückenteil von einem Spezialfahrzeug gefallen. wdr.de/nrw/sauerland-siegerl…
26
You are delusional.
Tusk Is Pushing Europe Toward War First of all, let us get one thing straight: Russia has no intention of moving into a NATO country. So let us take that argument off the table. If a NATO country is attacked, of course it will defend itself. That is common sense. But that is not what Tusk is talking about. He is pushing for confrontation with Russia, not simply defending Poland if it is attacked. That makes Tusk a very dangerous man for Europe. He wants war, not because Poland is under attack, but because he wants to confront and go against the Russians. Now Poland is warning NATO that if Russian warheads cross its eastern border, Warsaw will not wait for Brussels to make a decision. It is even talking about acting unilaterally before NATO can vote. This is exactly the kind of rhetoric Europe does not need. We need leaders who want to prevent war, not leaders who are looking for excuses to start one.
53
Now do Vietnam. Or Afganistan, both USSR and US cases...
I love this account. Ukraine has a population of roughly 39 Million people, right? Russia has a population of roughly 143 Million people, and the largest nuclear arsenal of any country on the planet. Ukraine will emerge victorious any day now.
1
83
They had 10x their own population to enslave, no need to get any anywhere else.
Worth noting that China had gunpowder weapons and naval fleets many centuries before Europe, but they never made any serious attempt to enslave or colonise the world. Perhaps they are better custodians of these new technologies.
Community note
China expanded its territory through military conquest and colonization under dynasties including the Han, Tang, Yuan, and Qing, annexing regions such as parts of Korea and Vietnam, Central Asia, Tibet, Xinjiang, Mongolia, and Taiwan. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_e… en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qing_dyna… asianstudies.org/publications/e…
121
Rok Adamlje retweeted
Here’s some video of the incident 🫠🫠
ᵀ¹ᵐᵉ
Uhhhh that’s not good, a fire in the aft has caused one of the landing legs to collapse 😬😬😬
29
13
304
86,603
Replying to @JunkScience
1/ @JunkScience ironically gets this much right: "No climate hoaxer has ever correctly predicted anything." Let's take a tour of "skeptic"/climate hoaxer failed predictions, starting with @mattwridley, who predicted <0.5°C warming from 1995 to 2025:
Replying to @AndrewDessler
Other failed predictions, in case @MichaelEMann is curious. x.com/MichaelEMann/status/20… For example, Matt Ridley (@mattwridley) predicted less than 0.5°C of warming for the 30 years following 1995. Then he admitted ~0.8°C happened: youtube.com/watch?v=C-gdabZo… mattridley.co.uk/blog/whatev…
3
23
56
4,757
Rok Adamlje retweeted
Their towing it by the raptor lmfao
Holy $#*! Well my friends, I've managed to get in touch with brilliant international wildlife photographer Chris Bray on Christmas Island and he just grabbed some shots of Ship 40 for us! Take a look at this!🤯 Lot's more to come so follow him from the link. 👇
68
47
2,343
104,943
At 10 km all water already freezes and rains down. Mostly co2 up there. In all, co2 represents 25% of the 33 degrees of greenhouse effect.
BBC again claims man-made CO2 drives global warming. Total rubbish - a physical impossibility. The main greenhouse is water vapour. CO2 makes a tiny contribution. The climate scam is costing humanity trillions
1
63
F off
🇪🇺 100 KM/H FOR EUROPE! I call on the European Union to introduce a mandatory European maximum speed limit of 100 km/h on all motorways and major roads. One Europe should have one clear maximum speed. Why? ✅ Safer roads — fewer fatal accidents and serious injuries ✅ Less energy waste — lower fuel and electricity consumption ✅ Less oil dependency — Europe must reduce its dependence on imported fossil fuels ✅ Lower emissions — slower speeds mean lower consumption ✅ Less noise — especially around densely populated areas ✅ Simple European rules — one common maximum across our continent Cities, villages, construction zones and dangerous road sections must of course retain lower speed limits where necessary. But the European maximum should be clear: 100 KM/H. Europe must become safer, more energy-efficient and less dependent on hostile energy suppliers. 🇪🇺 One Europe. One maximum speed. 100 km/h. Gunther Fehlinger-Jahn Chairman, Austrian Committee for NATO Enlargement for Ukraine, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Austria and the European Union @GunterFehlinger fehlinger.net #Europe #EuropeanUnion #EU #SpeedLimit #100kmh #RoadSafety #EnergySecurity #EnergyIndependence #Transport #Mobility #Climate #PaxEuropeana
42
Again with a false "irrelevant trace gas argument". Clack is just stirring shit
Consider the physics of planetary scale: Carbon dioxide makes up just 0.042% of our atmosphere—roughly 426 parts per million. Visually, that equates to just 4 molecules out of every 10,000, or a single molecule in a crowd of 2,500. Even with historical shifts, it remains a minuscule trace element. Like water vapor, CO₂ warms the atmosphere by absorbing specific narrow bands of outbound infrared radiation. But scale matters. Water vapor can make up to 4% of the atmosphere in humid tropical regions, averaging 1% to 2% globally, with clouds covering roughly 69% of the planet at any given time. Concentrations of water vapor are routinely a hundred times higher than CO₂. Consequently, water vapor is by far the planet's dominant greenhouse gas, driving anywhere from 50% to 70% of the natural greenhouse effect. Yet, despite its tiny atmospheric footprint, CO₂ is the indispensable foundation for biological life. Through photosynthesis, terrestrial plants convert sunlight, water, and CO₂ into glucose energy and oxygen, forming the backbone of every land-based food chain. It's not just the trees. In the seas, microscopic phytoplankton drive between 50% and 85% of the world's photosynthesis and oxygen production. Furthermore, dissolved carbon is a fundamental building block for marine life, utilised by corals, shellfish, and pteropods to construct their shells. But the physical engine of global climate isn't a trace gas at all, nor is it the thin atmospheric envelope above us. It has always been the oceans. Covering 71% of Earth's surface to an average depth of 2.3 miles, the oceans are the world's true thermal heartbeat. Water is roughly 800 times denser than air, and the top 2.5 metres of ocean store as much heat energy as the entire atmosphere. The oceanic world holds over 80% of Earth's mobile carbon reservoir and stores more than 93% of the climate system's retained heat energy. Oceanic currents are the planet's true air conditioning unit, endlessly transporting immense stores of tropical heat toward the poles—a global conveyor belt that takes a thousand years to complete a single circuit. Earth is a dynamic, interactive system driven by the fundamental laws of physics and thermodynamics—not oversimplified computer models or economic spreadsheets. The idea of a single trace gas controlling the entire biosphere unravels under the sheer weight of planetary reality.
37
Also that would make deniers go "SEE ALL CO2 IS FROM THE OCEAN"
The warmer the oceans get, the less CO2 it can hold. So it creates a feedback. More greenhouse gases stay in the air, and it all warms even more.
29
Ta država nujno rabi več umetnikov in kulturnikov.
23
This idiot still cant fathom the concept of a night.
PAL REVIEWED CONSENSUS SCIENCE. We all experienced being fooled about the origins and mitigation measures of a certain virus that killed millions. We are also being fooled about the actual properties of the Sun in order to made guilty for bad weather.
106
As opposed to you rejecting all of findings you dont agree with.
My detractors in the comments BELIEVE The Science™. They believe because they believe someone else believes. They are super duper smart.
17
Vozni pas je itak 90 ker je polno tovornjakov.
31
Oceans are on net absorbing co2. Air concentration is higher than one in the water. You idiot.
Net zero policy has had zero effect on global CO2. This is because T->[CO2]. What happens to sparkling water when it warms up? #auspol #BBCNews
15