Neofederalist, America First Nationalist. The Official Personal Account For @SamParkerSenate
Tomorrow
- Tweets 37,186
- Following 774
- Followers 147,402
- Likes 103,052
Pinned Tweet
馃毃 BREAKING: TPUSA CORPORATE ITSELF INSTRUCTED THE UVU CHAPTER TO SET UP THE SEPTEMBER 10 EVENT @RealCandaceO
This was exactly the opposite of the usual process where university clubs reach out to TPUSA corporate to request an event.
Do they not realize how this looks?
>TPUSA itself initiated the event, but did it through the UVU club president
>TPUSA specifically requested the courtyard
>UVU resisted, saying it was too risky
>TPUSA insisted
>TPUSA refused medical & emergency services
>TPUSA insisted on handling the ticketing so that UVU couldn't adequately assess attendance size and event risk
>TPUSA security never conducted a walk-through with UVUPD
>TPUSA security missed the coordinating meeting with UVUPD chief long on the Hall of Flags the day of the event
>TPUSA security and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing
>TPUSA security called Ben Shapiro's security on the way to the hospital
>TPUSA security lied about who decided to hold the event in the courtyard
>TPUSA security refused to cooperate with the investigation
WHO TOLD TPUSA FIELD REP MAYCEE CROFTS TO SET THE EVENT UP?
77
409
2,077
252,089
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
Who told Maycee Crofts to initiate the event? And why has she locked her Twitter account?
馃毃 BREAKING: TPUSA CORPORATE ITSELF INSTRUCTED THE UVU CHAPTER TO SET UP THE SEPTEMBER 10 EVENT @RealCandaceO
This was exactly the opposite of the usual process where university clubs reach out to TPUSA corporate to request an event.
Do they not realize how this looks?
>TPUSA itself initiated the event, but did it through the UVU club president
>TPUSA specifically requested the courtyard
>UVU resisted, saying it was too risky
>TPUSA insisted
>TPUSA refused medical & emergency services
>TPUSA insisted on handling the ticketing so that UVU couldn't adequately assess attendance size and event risk
>TPUSA security never conducted a walk-through with UVUPD
>TPUSA security missed the coordinating meeting with UVUPD chief long on the Hall of Flags the day of the event
>TPUSA security and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing
>TPUSA security called Ben Shapiro's security on the way to the hospital
>TPUSA security lied about who decided to hold the event in the courtyard
>TPUSA security refused to cooperate with the investigation
WHO TOLD TPUSA FIELD REP MAYCEE CROFTS TO SET THE EVENT UP?
8
34
196
3,500
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO
鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU
鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND
鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH
鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG
鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE
鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION
Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review:
1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections
2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements.
3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.
4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event.
5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including:
鈻笍lines of sight;
鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops;
鈻笍building access;
鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure;
鈻笍communications;
鈻笍staffing;
鈻笍emergency response;
鈻笍medical contingencies;
鈻笍emergency egress;
鈻笍post assignments; and
鈻笍who was responsible for which security function.
The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand.
Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur.
6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it.
7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
167
783
2,952
191,432
2/ It gets worse
馃毃 BREAKING: TPUSA CORPORATE ITSELF INSTRUCTED THE UVU CHAPTER TO SET UP THE SEPTEMBER 10 EVENT @RealCandaceO
This was exactly the opposite of the usual process where university clubs reach out to TPUSA corporate to request an event.
Do they not realize how this looks?
>TPUSA itself initiated the event, but did it through the UVU club president
>TPUSA specifically requested the courtyard
>UVU resisted, saying it was too risky
>TPUSA insisted
>TPUSA refused medical & emergency services
>TPUSA insisted on handling the ticketing so that UVU couldn't adequately assess attendance size and event risk
>TPUSA security never conducted a walk-through with UVUPD
>TPUSA security missed the coordinating meeting with UVUPD chief long on the Hall of Flags the day of the event
>TPUSA security and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing
>TPUSA security called Ben Shapiro's security on the way to the hospital
>TPUSA security lied about who decided to hold the event in the courtyard
>TPUSA security refused to cooperate with the investigation
WHO TOLD TPUSA FIELD REP MAYCEE CROFTS TO SET THE EVENT UP?
2
11
88
3,175
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
I need people to eat serious humble pie. From @paramounttactcl to Andrew Wilson's @paleochristcon wife plus more who tried to tell me, the trained medical professional, that CPR wasn't necessary. You people are sick for defending the people who denied Charlie Kirk life saving care in the last moments of his life. ALLEGEDLY
Too much yankin' & bankin' must have made @DrFrankTurek & Brian Harpole forget that the fire department performed CPR on Charlie Kirk at the hospital. How could they have missed this detail in all eleventy-three versions of their stories?
7
18
102
3,154
Too much yankin' & bankin' must have made @DrFrankTurek & Brian Harpole forget that the fire department performed CPR on Charlie Kirk at the hospital. How could they have missed this detail in all eleventy-three versions of their stories?
43
195
1,478
27,554
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
It had to be in the courtyard, that part of the operation was non negotiable.
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO
鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU
鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND
鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH
鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG
鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE
鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION
Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review:
1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections
2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements.
3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.
4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event.
5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including:
鈻笍lines of sight;
鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops;
鈻笍building access;
鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure;
鈻笍communications;
鈻笍staffing;
鈻笍emergency response;
鈻笍medical contingencies;
鈻笍emergency egress;
鈻笍post assignments; and
鈻笍who was responsible for which security function.
The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand.
Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur.
6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it.
7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
3
18
1,310
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO
鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU
鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND
鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH
鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG
鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE
鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION
Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review:
1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections
2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements.
3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.
4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event.
5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including:
鈻笍lines of sight;
鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops;
鈻笍building access;
鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure;
鈻笍communications;
鈻笍staffing;
鈻笍emergency response;
鈻笍medical contingencies;
鈻笍emergency egress;
鈻笍post assignments; and
鈻笍who was responsible for which security function.
The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand.
Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur.
6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it.
7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
167
783
2,952
191,432
It鈥檚 almost as if Charlie鈥檚 security knew he was supposed to die that day or something.
Security looks like it was intentionally ignored for the purposes of placing a patsy on the roof.
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO
鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU
鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND
鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH
鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG
鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE
鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION
Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review:
1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections
2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements.
3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.
4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event.
5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including:
鈻笍lines of sight;
鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops;
鈻笍building access;
鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure;
鈻笍communications;
鈻笍staffing;
鈻笍emergency response;
鈻笍medical contingencies;
鈻笍emergency egress;
鈻笍post assignments; and
鈻笍who was responsible for which security function.
The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand.
Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur.
6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it.
7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
14
81
457
10,038
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
Before this was the, we don't know know, but we know. Now it's the, we know.
@RealCandaceO
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO
鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU
鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND
鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH
鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG
鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE
鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION
Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review:
1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections
2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements.
3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.
4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event.
5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including:
鈻笍lines of sight;
鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops;
鈻笍building access;
鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure;
鈻笍communications;
鈻笍staffing;
鈻笍emergency response;
鈻笍medical contingencies;
鈻笍emergency egress;
鈻笍post assignments; and
鈻笍who was responsible for which security function.
The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand.
Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur.
6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it.
7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
2
11
1,186
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
CHARLIE'S SECURITY FAILED HIM ON 9/10 @ UVU
CLEAR BREAKDOWN THE SECURITY REVIEW @BasedSamParker
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO
鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU
鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND
鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH
鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG
鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE
鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION
Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review:
1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections
2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements.
3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.
4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event.
5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including:
鈻笍lines of sight;
鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops;
鈻笍building access;
鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure;
鈻笍communications;
鈻笍staffing;
鈻笍emergency response;
鈻笍medical contingencies;
鈻笍emergency egress;
鈻笍post assignments; and
鈻笍who was responsible for which security function.
The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand.
Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur.
6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it.
7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
2
4
21
1,420
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
TPUSA tanked Charlie!
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO
鈻笍TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU
鈻笍TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
鈻笍TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND
鈻笍TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH
鈻笍TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG
鈻笍BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE
鈻笍TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION
Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review:
1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections
2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements.
3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.
4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3鈥攐nly one week before the event.
5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including:
鈻笍lines of sight;
鈻笍elevated positions and rooftops;
鈻笍building access;
鈻笍Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure;
鈻笍communications;
鈻笍staffing;
鈻笍emergency response;
鈻笍medical contingencies;
鈻笍emergency egress;
鈻笍post assignments; and
鈻笍who was responsible for which security function.
The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand.
Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur.
6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it.
7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
1
42
288
16,668
"Not one person, not one human being has come forward and said 'I was with Erika.'" - @Whatthefekete
Body language expert Christine Fekete points out various Erika Kirk contradictions and alibi weaknesses.
24
139
953
19,208
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
CORRECTION ON PARKING GARAGE DODGE?
Upon further analysis of the parking garage Dodge alleged to be Tyler Robinson's, the rear exhaust DOES seem to match Tyler's Dodge Challenger. However, the front ends still might not match.
Watch this and tell me if these cars match or not.
馃毃"TYLER'S CARS" DON'T MATCH
They said that's Tyler's car in the parking garage but it's clearly not the same car! Look at the exhaust pipes! Dual vs. Quad!
@RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @jimmy_dore
121
110
660
117,902
Sam Parker 馃嚭馃嚫馃Н retweeted
I covered this back in July
CORRECTION ON PARKING GARAGE DODGE?
Upon further analysis of the parking garage Dodge alleged to be Tyler Robinson's, the rear exhaust DOES seem to match Tyler's Dodge Challenger. However, the front ends still might not match.
Watch this and tell me if these cars match or not.
3
4
18
1,934
Glad we're making 1潭7潭7潭6潭 1898 great again
馃毃#BREAKING: Trump administration is reportedly laying groundwork for a U.S. invasion of Cuba within months.
15
6
109
5,915
jewess tells @MyronGainesX, "Your existence has no value."
She's not beating the allegations. Lol
鈾︼笍Myron Has This J3wish Girl Completely FLABBERGASTED! 馃ぃ馃槺馃珷
"You need to shut your mouth you are disgusting!"
"I'll tell you this, I'll get you a kosher kitchen j3w"
15
13
176
13,849
I'VE COVERED THE DODGE CHALLENGER EXHAUST TIPS for months. Unfortunately, @RealCandaceO's new footage doesn't settle the debate, IMO. Depending on frame, angle & light, whether in the parking garage or on top, you can see 1, 2 & even 3 exhaust holes at a time鈥攎aking it difficult to have 100% certainty either way.
CORRECTION ON PARKING GARAGE DODGE?
Upon further analysis of the parking garage Dodge alleged to be Tyler Robinson's, the rear exhaust DOES seem to match Tyler's Dodge Challenger. However, the front ends still might not match.
Watch this and tell me if these cars match or not.
50
10
129
23,689