“So it wasn’t an open-air prison?”
That is one of the most common comments under photos of Gaza before October 7. Apparently, a beach, a restaurant, or a beautiful building is supposed to prove that people were free.
“Open-air prison” describes restrictions on people’s freedom, not how nice their surroundings look. Those photos also rarely show Gaza’s overcrowded refugee camps or the poverty in which so many people lived.
Before October 7, Israel controlled Gaza’s airspace and its crossings. And they controlled what entered Gaza. Leaving to study, work, or receive medical treatment depended on permissions many people could not obtain, and it required bribing Hamas to put their name on the list of those who were allowed to travel.
Israel’s control even extended to calculating Gaza’s food needs in calories. That calculation is documented, not simply an allegation.
Recognizing Israel’s responsibility does not excuse Hamas’s role in making life unbearable in Gaza. Hamas imposed exorbitant taxes on people, prompting repeated protests against its policies. These abuses deserve attention too. People who call Gaza an open-air prison should also be willing to address Hamas’s role in making it one.
But yes, Gaza was an open-air prison. When external powers control your life, severely restrict your ability to leave, and determine what goods and food are allowed in, a beautiful shoreline does not make you free.
Palestinians finding moments of happiness under those conditions never meant those conditions were acceptable.
A photo of Gaza before October 7, 2023.