My friends call me the Midwest Top-G Co Host on @NotTheCabinet Podcast Forever Growing, Join Me Here: jointherealworld.com/?a=kjkp…

@Cobratate and @TateTheTalisman have only had a positive impact on my life. I know millions of other men can say the same. Full rant on a new episode of The Cabinet: rumble.com/v7dpii2-innocent-… #FREETHETATES @TheRefinedG @PeerJuelichAI @JariKrisztian @LadyGAura @tateprotest @Dylanmadden @basedbrickpush1 @CryptoProfAdam @Mr_A_Lives @AIBoostX @McBrideLawNYC @theobsidianhand
19
14
28
13,163
H.A.T.E.R.S. Harboring Anger Towards Everyone Reaching Success
22
The Mob wants you afraid of them. Don't be. Full rant on a new episode of The Cabinet: rumble.com/v7fhwrw-the-cabin…
30
War is a mans domain. That's not oppression, that is protection. Full rant on a new episode of The Cabinet: rumble.com/v7fhwrw-the-cabin…
2
35
The last Tweet that was put out by their father Emory ( @tateterrific ) was in 2013. He has put out 186 Tweets, not one of which referenced being vice president in Donald Trump's administration (nor any of the vile shit you just made up). Do not slander a mans dead father @Gadget440 It is a truly disgraceful level to drop to in an attempt to push a false narrative. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Andrew Tate posts from jail about how awesome his dad was. His father was against the age of consent, and once Tweeted: "What is wrong with American society when fertile women are not allowed to procreate? How is it possible that all women at puberty are allowed to f*** boys, no mature men? If I joined Donald Trump as Vice-President, all consensual sex with women post pubescent would not be a crime, retroactively. The first crime was locking the boyfriend up in prison. The second crime was denying his bloodline the right to reproduce - even as all our grandparents married at 15yrs (human). It explains a lot.
12
6
19
3,190
The world is sick, only the bravery to do what is right will heal it. Full rant on a new episode of The Cabinet: rumble.com/v7fhwrw-the-cabin…
1
52
The attack on the holdout juror tells me one thing. They want you afraid of doing the right thing. A piece of advice? Don't be. Full rant on a new episode of The Cabinet: rumble.com/v7fhwrw-the-cabin…
33
Men will move mountains for the right girl. Become her, your life will get better when you do. Full rant on a new episode of The Cabinet: rumble.com/v7fhwrw-the-cabin…
3
62
The best part about building something with your friends is the insults and endless roasting of each other while you achieve greatness. Nothing beats it.
1
31
They aren't even trying to hide it anymore. If you don't bend the knee to the left and let a child murderer walk free... They will try to destroy your reputation and your life. They want you to fear doing the right thing. Don't.
1
63
Christopher Strobach retweeted
Replying to @SassySouthBlond
You're right. Good men don't do those things. But when good men have influence... And they use that influence to speak out against the system... The system aims to destroy them by any means necessary. First they try and cancel you, then they try and put you in jail, then they try to kill you. Alex Jones got cancelled, that worked. He was right about everything. Julian Assange got cancelled, but that didn't work because he owned Wikileaks (which exposed shady shit the establishment was doing). So an anonymous woman accused him of rape, he went to prison for 12 years with no conviction. When he got out, that case disappeared, the woman never existed in fact. Donald Trump couldn't be bought, so the media cancelled him and called him a racist. When that didn't work, they accused him of colluding with the Russians (proven to be a lie by the end of his first term), women accused him of rape (also lies that no one believed). So they tried to kill him. Twice. Understand that the Tate brothers are on stage 2. They had their socials banned all at once, were slandered in the media, they destroyed the narrative the media and the system tried to pin on them, and suddenly they are accused of human trafficking. Funny that. Almost as if...it's another setup, aimed at powerful voices who speak out against the corruption in this world. This is why we stand with the Tates no matter what they are accused of, because we've seen this playbook before. And we know they are innocent.
3
1
1
104
How convenient is it for the left that the one man who stopped a child murderer from being found NOT GUILTY is a Black man. And now they are coming after him, attacking him in the media, digging up everything they can on him and slandering him endlessly all because he didn't bend to the narrative. Seems an awful lot like a modern day Lynch Mob to me... Food for thought.
The one Black juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial, who refused to acquit Clancy, reportedly had an active restraining order against him, along with more than $12,000 in unpaid rent, while serving on the high-profile murder trial. He is also alleged to have grabbed his wife by the neck and punched his nephew in a September 2021 police report. Follow: @AFpost
51
Christopher Strobach retweeted
Andrew Tate.
in honor of suicide prevention awareness month, what are some reason you haven’t killed yourself?
37
142
2,103
59,303
God rest the souls of those lost 25 years ago today.
3
54
Most of these people aren't thinking, they are just running with the narrative. Don't waste your time on them. Full discussion on a new episode of The Cabinet: rumble.com/v7f5uhm-the-cabin…
1
47
Christopher Strobach retweeted
Feeling good man. Because the UK has to present actual evidence by the 16th. We know that they have nothing. The Tates will be free. And your camp will lament.
7
1
105
The Jurors who are coming out talking shit about the one man who refused to let Lindsay Clancy off the hook for murdering her kids look exactly as I expected them to. The people who are brave enough to show their face that believe Andrew Tate is guilty because of accusations alone look exactly as I expected them to. Physiognomy is real.
1
93
"My English isn't very good." Proceeds to write a Tolkien sized letter in perfect English, with perfect punctuation. This is slander meant to tarnish their name even more. Just like everything else. If there was evidence of any wrongdoing, they would have been convicted YEARS ago. #FreeTheTates
🚨 BREAKING: New details have emerged from Andrew Tate's trafficking minors charge. The following email was allegedly sent by the alleged victim's father to Tate, indicating that the father had discovered pornographic content of the daughter when she was a minor, and was concerned that she was not going to school: Andrew, This is XXXXXX’s father. I am writing to you to clarify what has happened. Recently, I have felt the need to “speak” with you, man to man. My English is not good enough to speak with you properly over the phone, so I am contacting you first by email. As far as I know, you are aware of what XXXXXX has been doing and where she has been during the last three months of her stay in London. What she has done is unacceptable and unforgivable. During those months, she has disgraced our family name and reputation. Photographs of her naked body are circulating throughout the region. We have become targets of ridicule, mockery and contempt. It is not only obscene photographs that have circulated, but also videos of her taking part in live erotic chat. I would like your explanation, so that I can confirm that we are both hearing the same story. She went to London to study. She took leave from a prestigious church high school here, intending-or under the pretext-that she would return to graduate. After that, she could have gone wherever she wanted, including to be with you. I must admit that I was never in favour of this, but the contract with a modelling agency gave me hope that she would be able to pursue her dream of modelling. I should have asked many more questions. It is extremely unconventional to take a 17-year-old girl away without first introducing yourself to her parents. I blame myself for an enormous oversight—in hindsight, I should never have agreed to this arrangement. She claims she did it for money. Please understand: we are not a poor family. Nor were our daughters raised in luxury. We have everything we need. Our children have never gone without anything. It is true that not every whim of theirs was satisfied, but I do not consider that a disadvantage. What I am saying is that there was never any need for us to send our own children abroad into the care of strangers. She could have gone there if she wanted to study. My wife, who visited the two of you in London a month ago, returned describing you as a responsible and honest man who loves our daughter and understands that, at only 17 years old, she needs to be looked after. I found that reassuring, even though you and I had never met. Your alleged statement to my daughter, “I am your father now,” reinforced my wife’s impression that you were a responsible and straightforward man. So I will ask you directly, and I expect direct answers. What assurances and evidence can you give me that my daughter is continuing her high-school education in England and is not—forgive me for being blunt—simply a paid mistress? Please explain to me how you were looking after her if something like this was allowed to happen. Did you not check where she was going—especially if your brother Tristan was driving her there? Were you not interested in the photographs she was having taken? When she sent me some of the photographs, I immediately commented on the poor lighting, which no reputable photographer would have published. Having seen some of the comments online, how do you explain her working night shifts? Did nobody notice that she was gone during those hours? How can I trust an adult who promises to take care of my daughter when, within three weeks, I am confronted with this disgusting affair by members of my congregation in my hometown, completely blindsided? What guarantee can you give me that this behaviour will not happen again-or, God forbid, that she will not end up posing for photographs and videos containing even more explicit material, creating an even bigger scandal for all of us? Frankly, there is not much further she could go. What prospects does she have if she does not attend school and obtain her high-school diploma? What will she do-become a shop assistant, perhaps a doorman? From what I have observed, she is not particularly interested in her education. What kind of modelling career does she have when the first photographs of her that I found enthusiastically reviewed online are erotic in nature and her reputation has already been damaged? I want to ask you quite openly: how serious are you about my daughter, and what are your intentions toward her? Do you realise that her actions cast a shadow over all of us, including you? I am not completely familiar with the British legal system, but distributing images and videos of a sexual nature involving a minor is a criminal offence here in Slovakia. I am fairly certain that the same is true in the United Kingdom. She is not an adult in either of our countries. Under Slovak law, we, her parents, remain responsible for her. You may be held legally responsible for her actions once this reaches the authorities. What does your family think about all of this? Will they not see her as just another girl of questionable morals from the East who came there to make money indecently? We did not raise her this way, and I dare say this would never have happened had she remained at home. Andrew, I do not want you to think that I blame you entirely, and correct me if I am wrong, but you bear some responsibility for this because you agreed to take responsibility for her welfare during her stay in England and, as such, for what happened. I therefore expect you to be a man and answer all of my questions in this email. I will not lie: I am deeply disappointed by my daughter’s behaviour, carelessness and ignorance, as well as by how her stay in the United Kingdom has developed. As her father, I am filled with disappointment, anger and humiliation. At this point I can only guess at the serious consequences this disgusting affair will have for my position as a Lutheran pastor and what it will mean for my family. I am sure you agree that this needs to be resolved quickly. I will not accept a resolution consisting merely of declarations of your love for one another and promises that everything will be fine. As far as I am concerned, ending her stay in the United Kingdom and returning her home is the only solution. On Friday, I told my daughter to return home within one week. Please do not challenge this decision. If she does not comply and my underage daughter has not returned by Friday, 9 January, I have decided that I will travel to London and bring her home myself. I understand that not protecting her, but instead sending her back, may be a sacrifice for you. If you truly love her-if you love one another-you will get through it. For now, it may even be a relief. Mistakes have consequences that must be endured. This is a universal law that she needs to learn and experience. Because of the disappointment she has caused us, we have lost our trust in her. I never imagined I would live to see such poor judgement and immoral behaviour from her. Having demonstrated that she is immature, deceptive and in need of guidance, XXXXXX cannot remain abroad because she needs to be under parental supervision before the situation gets even further out of control. We, her parents, have withdrawn our consent for her to remain abroad, and she will return home. It would be difficult for her to return to the school she attended in Košice and openly face the shame, so a new school will have to be found. In addition, our daughter’s written admission to my wife concerning her alleged sex addiction means that we must seek professional help for her immediately. Did you know about this? What do you think about this admission? If you were aware of it, how did you intend to deal with it? Trivialising the seriousness of this situation will not help anyone. On the contrary, sheltering her will only cause further harm. It will allow her to remain under the illusion that she does not understand the extent of the damage done to you and to our family, as well as the possible damage to herself and her future career-whatever that may be. I do not accept her excuse that you know everything, have forgiven her, and that everything will be fine because you will not send her away and she has nowhere else to go. This is an enormous understatement, perhaps caused by her young age and her inability to comprehend the seriousness of this failure. With so little life experience, she is incapable of fully understanding the consequences of this terrible lapse in judgement. This will never simply be “fine.” I look forward to your reply and to seeing you take an honourable position on this matter. Sincerely, XXXXXX’s father
1
91
I would too. Just because you are "insane", that does not mean you were not guilty. Jeffery Dommer was insane (clearly). He was found guilty. Why? Because it isn't a question of whether or not they are insane. It's a question of whether or not they did it.
I’ve watched this probably 100 times at this point. This one quote by this one juror is radicalizing me in ways I didn’t know were even possible: “He had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously k*lled her children…” I don’t know where we go from here…
1
1
59
Christopher Strobach retweeted
Replying to @Therealsuzywyn1
Because there are no victims. There are only accusations. Accusations that conveniently appeared after they became globally influential without the system propping them up. The UK has produced zero evidence to actually get them extradited (this was discovered in the initial extradition hearing a couple weeks ago). In the Romanian case, every single one of the "victims" have come out in defense of the Tates (one of which is the mother of Tristan's daughter). The prosecution omitted this from their case file, along with countless hours of CCTV footage the Tate Brothers provided that proved conclusively there was no human trafficking taking place. The Tates have all of this, and there has been zero opportunity for them to present THIER evidence across 4 years. I have "no empathy" because I am fully aware this is a setup. If there was evidence. ACTUAL EVIDENCE. They would have been locked up years ago.
1
1
1
33