1. The leaflets story was published in the British press the next day, along with the content of Hitler's letter––hardly a sign that Churchill was worried about people seeing it. Again, what's your source here? (Hat tip: @mcmoynihan)
Early in WW2, when Hitler was still refusing to retaliate in kind for British bombings of German civilian targets, he had the Luftwaffe drop leaflets calling for peace onto British cities. Churchill had teams of street sweepers on standby to clean them up before anyone saw them, and the public was warned about being found in possession of them. Even if you think the call for peace was pure deception, people have a right to hear the other side out when deliberating over peace or war. Why not trust yourself and the people to suss fact from fiction and make informed decisions? It’s very telling that every time the government wants us to kill and die for it, extreme measures are taken to ensure we never hear the other side’s perspective. Don’t be afraid, be an adult, and a responsible citizen, hear them out and then decide.

Jul 7, 2025 · 1:18 AM UTC

57
204
2,243
191,329
2. To my knowledge, the only British bombing of "German civilian targets" prior to the leaflets was Mönchengladbach on May 10/11, 1940––which targeted German railways and killed 4 German civilians incidentally. Did Hitler's non-response to this really signify "restraint", or did it signify the fact that he was busy invading the Low Countries & France at the time and could hardly have diverted resources?
10
26
619
29,217
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
@martyrmade might want to concern himself a little less with building his follower count & invest in a fact checking team. Just saying.
4
1
86
5,727
After a week of following him and dispelling his falsehoods with facts, Daryl Cooper blocked me 😆😆. He's so afraid of the truth and I'm not surprised why
3
51
2,940
The leaflets were drooped on August 1940, by that time Hitler broke his agreements at least 3 times, by invading 1) Czechoslovakia, 2) Poland and 3) France + Lowlands. By that time "Appeal to reason" was just a Psyop! Any other claim is just gaslighting or a current Psyop.
2
42
2,385
It's insane, Martyr Made just spouts made up stuff, and people believe it.. Glad to see you pushing back Coleman❣️
1
39
2,022
The original appeal to reason was made in 1938 by Neville Chamberlain in an attempt to prevent war and bring 'peace in our time'. Yet, Hitler broke this agreement and proceeded to attack Poland, France, Lowlands etc. only Cooper still trusts Hitler under such circumstances.
2
1
26
1,147
Where to start? The leaflet referred to here—“A Last Appeal to Reason,” by Adolf Hitler—was dropped en masse on August 1, 1940. By that date: 1) Nazi Germany’s attempt to destroy the Royal Air Force ahead of an invasion of Britain was already in its fourth week (on July 10, 1940, 21 days before the leaflets, 120 Luftwaffe bombers hit British ships in the channel, and 70 Luftwaffe bombers struck dockyards in Wales—from that date on, raids were staged by the Luftwaffe every day and night); 2) Hitler had already issued Directive No. 16 (July 16), which formalized plans for the imminent invasion of Britain (Operation Sealion); and 3) Nazi Germany had already conquered France, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg, and had begun (in July 1940) to make plans to invade the Soviet Union—with which it had signed a non-aggression pact!—and to murder tens of millions of its supposedly subhuman people (see: Himmler’s memo of 25 May 1940). Cooper’s causation is false, too. Five weeks after the leaflet was dropped, Nazi Germany started bombing London and other British cities in a campaign known as the “Blitz.” But this did not happen because, to his great regret, Hitler’s friendly little leaflet campaign had failed; it happened because, by that point, Hitler had realized that Nazi Germany was losing the Battle of Britain, that the air superiority he needed prior to an invasion was going to elude him, and that a new tactic was necessary. In a sense, the Blitz was an updated leaflet campaign: the purpose was to turn the British against the war and leave Nazi Germany with a free hand to do more of what it had done since 1937. As for the idea that Churchill magically had all the leaflets collected? The Nazis dropped five million of them, in literally every part of the country. So, while efforts were indeed made in cities to clean up, and the British government, indeed, didn’t like it, hiding them all wasn’t remotely feasible—or even attempted in earnest. Even in the 1990s, when I was a kid, there were so many of them in circulation that you’d see them at garage sales and antique shops, and old people would go get them from their attics to show them off. To cast Hitler as Cooper does here—and, by extension, Churchill—you have to ignore that, when this leaflet was dropped, Nazi Germany had taken over pretty much all of Western Europe, and was in the process of attempting to destroy Britain’s air defenses so that, in Hitler’s own words of July 16, Germany could “eliminate the English homeland as a base for the prosecution of the war against Germany and, if necessary, to occupy it completely.” If you are able to read those words and buy their implication that Germany was merely acting defensively, then you’re a total bloody moron. x.com/martyrmade/status/1941…
13
3,510
The reason Cooper thinks he's a well-read historian is because he knows more about history than his followers, but they're the biggest bunch of ignoramuses on the planet.
11
448
As Herman Khan recounted in Escalation, the UK, France & Nazi Germany were all at 1st terrified of aerial urban bombing. All avoided it, focusing on counterforce strikes. The Nazis broke this MAD stalemate by obliterating Rotterdam & boasting about it. Alll gloves were then off!
11
522
Utterly disgusting people read this expression of idiocy (from martyr made) and go oh wow what a revelation.
7
712
source is trust me bro.
8
704
The notion that Hitler wanted peace can only come from a warmongering, war justifying buffoon An absolute clown
8
286
You might like the relatively new podcast, Crackpot History, which has kicked off by looking at the errors or misstatements in Cooper's Fear and Loathing series. @crackpothist
6
294
Thanks for the receipts, Coleman! Excellent!
4
1,007
So, you agree then that Tucker should have the interview and people hearing what has to be said should be encouraged. Riiiiiight.
6
3
2,730
Probably David Irwing again.
1
4
1,912
Whole argument is nonsense - after they have invaded of course the invader will then want peace This does not then make them "reasonable" nor is any resistance leader a "warmonger"
3
188
They lie and lie and lie, Coleman.
3
455
Replying to @coldxman
Interview Peter Beinart and Omer Bartov
3
742
“An appeal to reason by Hitler”. A headline we don’t get a lot anymore. What happened?
2
628
I trust Cooper more than Zionists. That’s what happens when you call what’s happening in Gaza blood libel, people start questioning everything we were told, and rightly so.
2
50
The Foreign Secretary also broadcast an official reply to Hitler's speech as well, which hardly suggests a cover up of a German olive branch. ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1940/…
1
2
130
Maybe his source is Dave Smith?
2
292
I never thought we would reach the point of mainstream Nazi apologism and Hitler was trying to avoid war justificationism. Churchill was right & he outsmarted Hitler. Some actions cannot be allowed to pass, even if the cost for stopping them is high.
1
47
Ouch. This really destroys his narrative.
1
258
The calm, thoughtful tone of your posts is so refreshing. Thankful you’re around.
1
91
The Grimbsy Times! Grimsby is a port town in East England. Any more significant examples of press coverage?
1
1
281
Darryl Cooper is trash and his brain has been eaten by #maggots
1
55
@charlescwcooke also has good retelling of history on this.
1
401
Grimsby? For fs man, thats your proof 🤣🤣
1
44
Grimsby Evening Telegraph may be atypical of course. A sort of Tucker Carlson of early WW2.
91