1. The leaflets story was published in the British press the next day, along with the content of Hitler's letter––hardly a sign that Churchill was worried about people seeing it. Again, what's your source here? (Hat tip: @mcmoynihan)
Early in WW2, when Hitler was still refusing to retaliate in kind for British bombings of German civilian targets, he had the Luftwaffe drop leaflets calling for peace onto British cities. Churchill had teams of street sweepers on standby to clean them up before anyone saw them, and the public was warned about being found in possession of them. Even if you think the call for peace was pure deception, people have a right to hear the other side out when deliberating over peace or war. Why not trust yourself and the people to suss fact from fiction and make informed decisions? It’s very telling that every time the government wants us to kill and die for it, extreme measures are taken to ensure we never hear the other side’s perspective. Don’t be afraid, be an adult, and a responsible citizen, hear them out and then decide.
Jul 7, 2025 · 1:18 AM UTC
57
204
2,243
191,329
2. To my knowledge, the only British bombing of "German civilian targets" prior to the leaflets was Mönchengladbach on May 10/11, 1940––which targeted German railways and killed 4 German civilians incidentally. Did Hitler's non-response to this really signify "restraint", or did it signify the fact that he was busy invading the Low Countries & France at the time and could hardly have diverted resources?
10
26
619
29,217





































