Where to start? The leaflet referred to here—“A Last Appeal to Reason,” by Adolf Hitler—was dropped en masse on August 1, 1940. By that date: 1) Nazi Germany’s attempt to destroy the Royal Air Force ahead of an invasion of Britain was already in its fourth week (on July 10, 1940, 21 days before the leaflets, 120 Luftwaffe bombers hit British ships in the channel, and 70 Luftwaffe bombers struck dockyards in Wales—from that date on, raids were staged by the Luftwaffe every day and night); 2) Hitler had already issued Directive No. 16 (July 16), which formalized plans for the imminent invasion of Britain (Operation Sealion); and 3) Nazi Germany had already conquered France, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg, and had begun (in July 1940) to make plans to invade the Soviet Union—with which it had signed a non-aggression pact!—and to murder tens of millions of its supposedly subhuman people (see: Himmler’s memo of 25 May 1940). Cooper’s causation is false, too. Five weeks after the leaflet was dropped, Nazi Germany started bombing London and other British cities in a campaign known as the “Blitz.” But this did not happen because, to his great regret, Hitler’s friendly little leaflet campaign had failed; it happened because, by that point, Hitler had realized that Nazi Germany was losing the Battle of Britain, that the air superiority he needed prior to an invasion was going to elude him, and that a new tactic was necessary. In a sense, the Blitz was an updated leaflet campaign: the purpose was to turn the British against the war and leave Nazi Germany with a free hand to do more of what it had done since 1937. As for the idea that Churchill magically had all the leaflets collected? The Nazis dropped five million of them, in literally every part of the country. So, while efforts were indeed made in cities to clean up, and the British government, indeed, didn’t like it, hiding them all wasn’t remotely feasible—or even attempted in earnest. Even in the 1990s, when I was a kid, there were so many of them in circulation that you’d see them at garage sales and antique shops, and old people would go get them from their attics to show them off. To cast Hitler as Cooper does here—and, by extension, Churchill—you have to ignore that, when this leaflet was dropped, Nazi Germany had taken over pretty much all of Western Europe, and was in the process of attempting to destroy Britain’s air defenses so that, in Hitler’s own words of July 16, Germany could “eliminate the English homeland as a base for the prosecution of the war against Germany and, if necessary, to occupy it completely.” If you are able to read those words and buy their implication that Germany was merely acting defensively, then you’re a total bloody moron. x.com/martyrmade/status/1941…
Early in WW2, when Hitler was still refusing to retaliate in kind for British bombings of German civilian targets, he had the Luftwaffe drop leaflets calling for peace onto British cities. Churchill had teams of street sweepers on standby to clean them up before anyone saw them, and the public was warned about being found in possession of them. Even if you think the call for peace was pure deception, people have a right to hear the other side out when deliberating over peace or war. Why not trust yourself and the people to suss fact from fiction and make informed decisions? It’s very telling that every time the government wants us to kill and die for it, extreme measures are taken to ensure we never hear the other side’s perspective. Don’t be afraid, be an adult, and a responsible citizen, hear them out and then decide.

Jul 6, 2025 · 11:19 AM UTC

360
1,501
7,510
985,458
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @charlescwcooke
“Even if this was a psyop, people have a right to be psyopped by the enemy” I’m starting to think maybe this guy ain’t so bright
15
39
1,213
35,046
My favorite response was “you like debate, you’re a free speech guy, so why aren’t you persuaded by Nazi propaganda that was dropped on an island that Hitler was trying to invade, in the middle of the Battle of Britain?”
11
56
1,039
38,302
Replying to @charlescwcooke
"You need to hear the other side and decide for yourself. But don't concern yourself with pesky facts."
6
6
354
25,809
Replying to @charlescwcooke
"The other side's perspective"?! Does he not realise, in the context of WW2, how revolting that is?
6
4
82
7,382
Tucker said on his last episode he thought Cooper was the most important “historical” in America and he loved him. Mostly because Cooper has completely rewritten history to something unrecognizable by anyone who knows anything about the subject.
5
38
516
13,860
Replying to @charlescwcooke
(narrator: many in the audience were total fucking morons.)
5
1
304
10,517
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Tucker's favorite historian is demanding we acknowledge Hitler's generosity!
2
10
195
5,645
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Completely historically illiterate tripe you've spewed, here - it's like your understanding of this period was concocted from Spielberg films and allied propaganda reels... at least have the decency to link @martyrmade so I can like or RT.
11
1
56
1,523
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Thank you for working to get the facts out there. Cooper and his ilk are trying to rewrite WWII with Hitler as the good guy for a reason, and it's terrifying how many people are falling for it.
2
1
53
1,110
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Reality…
3
1
35
1,394
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Cooper is a straight up Nazi propagandist who uses the fact that so many Americans haven't been taught history properly to spread his bullshit.
2
5
44
758
Replying to @charlescwcooke
The spectre of "teams of street sweepers" prepared to scoop up enemy leaflets is a new level of silly, even for him.
37
1,996
Replying to @charlescwcooke
I would add here that Hitler very badly wanted peace (on his terms) with Britain during this period because he was already planning Operation Barbarossa and feared having to fight a two front war. Really, that person needs to read an actual WWII history book.
3
34
1,605
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Cooper’s point is that leaders should trust their people to suss fact from fiction, and it is good that we have access to a long form interview with an enemy of their state. Are you disagreeing with that?
26
21
7,376
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Charles your points are all right on target. But at least the Kremlin bot did the world a favor by clearly identifying the similarity between Tucker Carlson and a Nazi propagandist trying to undermine British resistance to Hitler.
1
16
536
Replying to @charlescwcooke
The Blitz (starting September 7, 1940) was a strategic shift after Luftwaffe losses, not a reaction to failed leaflets, it is supported by Luftwaffe records showing a pivot to night bombings to avoid RAF defenses. @grok @AskPerplexity can you fact check me?
2
1
3
5,703
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Nice post, but you give him far too much credit. He’s not worthy of your time.
2
5
613
He’s a historian Charlie. A historian.
1
2
682
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Every "debunk" of @martyrmade addresses ten points superficially similar to the actual specific point he is making, then never addresses the actual point, while proclaiming itself victorious for showing him to be "wrong" 10 separate times. It's a mesmerizing form of gaslighting.
4
47
1,288
Replying to @charlescwcooke
This "historian" said Hitler was born in Germany and was a patriotic German. He fails high school history.
1
51
923
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Cooper has indeed repeatedly proven to be a bloody moron.
2
50
2,079
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Darryl Cooper is not a moron but a fascist ideologue who signed up with Tucker Carlson and others to pour poison into the political environment. And the social media platforms allow them to spread their poison because of filthy lucre.
4
8
46
646
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Daryl Cooper is a Nazi sympathizer and Hitler apologist. Once people understand this they will begin to understand his interpretation of WWII
2
45
976
Replying to @charlescwcooke
"Revisionists" should at least concede that German re-armament programs, the Seizure of the Sudetenland and Operation Barbarossa (to name but three), are proof that perhaps the Furher & his chums shouldn't always be believed when it comes to their assurances about future plans.
3
36
2,129
Replying to @charlescwcooke
Well written! Chamberlain made the appeal to reason in 1938 when he signed a peace agreement with Hitler. Yet, Hitler didn't want peace and breached Germany's commitments (invading Poland, France etc.). Seeing these leaflets as anything other than Psyop is a Psyop in itself.
1
4
25
2,122
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@martyrmade continues to get even the basic facts wrong with almost every historical argument he makes. It’s as if he’s using his versions of history to promulgate his own ideology or something…
32
1,158
Replying to @charlescwcooke
You conveniently forgot to mention the following: > the German invasion of Poland was just them reclaiming a longstanding province of the German Empire that had been recently taken from them by violence (WW1) > they invaded France AFTER France had declared war on Germany - you can't start a war then act astonished when you find yourself at war > they invaded neutral Norway just before Britain launched its own planned invasion of neutral Norway
9
26
3,148
Replying to @charlescwcooke
So…(shocker) Douglas Murray was completely correct and Rogan asserted confidently that in no way was Cooper trying to give Hitler the benefit of a doubt, but clearly he was, and is.
2
28
1,911
Replying to @charlescwcooke
I don’t even pretend to be a “historian” and I recognize the startling ignorance in Cooper’s bit.
2
24
2,173