The entirety of leftist politics is taking two things that are only superficially similar and pretending that they are actually the exact same.

Dresden: 3,600 tons killed 25,000 people in just 3 days. 8,300 people killed per day. Gaza: 223,000 tons killed 70,000 people in 995 days. 70 people killed per day. If you think this demonstrates that Gaza is a genocide, you're an intellectual child and a moral imbecile.

New national anthem just dropped.

Most spiritually Palestinian video you'll ever see: Wants to destroy Israel, but fails and ends up destroying an entire Muslim nation instead.

goyim be like

You know this black guy grew up in a rich white neighborhood because this is the first time he's ever heard of this.

Notice that she had to crawl back 15 years to find an example of right-wing violence to this extent. By extension, one only need to crawl back a month or two to find examples of one of her favorite ethnic pets she's invited in en masse doing something similar.

Not what happened. The financial crash in 2008 was effectively DEI-gone-wrong in the housing market, not bailing out middle class boomers. Let me explain. In the 1980s and 1990s, mortgage approval rates and home ownership rates amongst blacks were significantly lower than amongst whites, and trending downward relatively. Under Clinton, they developed a plan to begin incentivizing banks to offer mortages more easily and numerously to "lower income households", aka blacks. The vehicle they used to achieve this was the sub-prime mortgage. A sub-prime mortgage is effectively a higher interest mortgage for people who typically would not qualify for a regular mortgage. They don't qualify because the default and foreclosure rate is predicted to be too high amongst this class of people, and therefore banks would lose money offering these mortgages to people with low credit scores and low earnings (blacks). The sub-prime mortgage attempts to mitigate this by increasing the interest rate on those who don't default in order to compensate for the losses from those who do. You can see the problem already: increasing the interest rate thus further increases the number of people who default, then you need to increase interest rates further to compensate for that. This becomes a runaway problem. That is why sub-prime mortgages were historically relatively rare and banks were picky about handing them out. Under this new DEI directive, banks begin handing out sub-prime mortgages at much higher rates to predominantly black families as a kind of housing affirmative-action. This is oversimplifying, but it's close enough. These mortgages were packaged into massive investment assets, which other banks like Lehmann Brothers invested into. These assets would be mixed in with other assets and retraded once again, until eventually they just became part of broader asset packages inside large portfolios. Worse yet, and perhaps the key point: banks and investors were borrowing on leverage to purchase these asset packages. Once the defaults and foreclosures inevitably stacked up over time, the value of holding these mortgages crashed, and along with it any asset package containing them. Any portfolio which was overly burdened by them consummately crashed, and once again, key point: if borrowing on leverage, the investor was margin called. Many banks and investors did not have the capital to answer the margin, leading to the market crash and completely destruction of these banks and investment firms; both the investors who were margin called, and the loaners who couldn't reclaim their loans by margin calling. The homes of White boomers were not part of this asset class. They did not benefit or use sub-prime mortgages. They did not invest in subprime mortgages. They have basically nothing to do with this at all in fact. Boomers paid off their houses despite historically high interest rates. The % of real median wages boomers paid into mortgage payments is comparable to what people pay today, despite housing prices increasing. Different topic for a different day. Know-nothing economic populism that attempts to blame every problem on some phantom phenomena of boomers that either doesn't exist or is barely even tangentially related to the concern at hand is a dead end, and there is no excuse to do this in the age of LLMs. Maybe instead start by caring about what's actually true instead, that is always at least a reliable starting point.

Cambridge refused to stand up for @nathancofnas, so he repaid them by scalping their star DEI professor. Gotta respect the hustle.

Even the wholesome Japanese are now using AI slop to engagement-bait X ad revenue from Americans.

The schvartze cries out in pain as she strikes you.

Caleb's cognitive dissonance here is just incredible to observe. His discussions on race in general give a window into the mind of the normie American on this topic. The normie's life is a constant process of every decision being filtered through the preference of avoiding black people, while stopping 10% short of actually confronting that fact for what it is. The guests say they wouldn't take a Carnival Cruise because of black people. Caleb responds he wouldn't either, but not because of black people, because of the unruly behavior by the cruisegoers. Geez, @sircalebhammer, which cruisegoers are being unruly? It must be the Chinese tourists!

I managed to be in the US for 4 months and avoided all anti-social nigga behavior but luck always runs out, two nasty Shaniquas facetiming with Tyrone in the middle of a Mexican restaurant with that shit on Max speaker volume.

Is there really not one single person in this company that has the courage just to sit down with the guy and explain to him that he has zero aesthetic taste and is ruining his own product by not realizing that?

I was hoping Crockett would win for the luls, but this'll do.

A specific form of Tourette's where you say "EPIC FURY!" then call Ben Shapiro multiple homophobic slurs in a row.

Using the term "survivor" to describe women who allege to have been sexually mistreated is more or less a completely justified reason to dismiss anything you have to say on the topic.

the schvartzes have gone insane.

Ready for a laugh? Watch this video. Then go look at the profile of the guy posting it and the profile of his audience that enjoyed it.

Texas is one giant LARP. I don't know if it used to be Texan, but today it's just a mix of transplants looking for something that doesn't really exist anymore, a bunch of locals LARPing something their parents or grandparents used to do, and then a bunch of leeching minorities who don't give a damn in either case. Florida is unironically more Texan than Texas.