This view that City made the league more competitive is… the opposite of the truth. It’s the most dominant spell ever seen in England: - 100 and 98 points - two trebles - four in a row None of these things had ever been done before

Crazy

I asked a woman to explain the Lindsay Clancy trial to me like I was 5, and she started strangling me

Time for the world to see the stooges of Govt of India celebrating terrorism.

This is why state ownership is terrible. Get them gone

😂😂😂

Exclusive with @AlexDooler @DNair5 UAE officials have warned the UK government that the severity of Man City’s punishment could undermine their appetite for future grand-scale commitments in Britain, according to people familiar with the matter They consider the Premier League’s actions to have an influence on the bilateral state relationship, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing undisclosed information The extraordinary pressure comes after Andy Burnham faced criticism, including from within government, for saying Man City’s Abu Dhabi owners should not be disqualified specifically because of the investment they bring to Britain bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

Using public transport, built on public money, as an on-off switch, cutting access of public using it for so many reasons is a full-blown scam.

Statement: IFF condemns the internet shutdown in Connaught Place ahead of today's protest. We are tracing the suspension order. New Delhi, 2 October 2026 The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) condemns the suspension of mobile internet services in and around Connaught Place, New Delhi, this morning. At 9:40 am, Jio subscribers in the area received a message stating: "As per government instructions Internet services have been stopped in your area till further notice." The shutdown took effect before a protest called for 11 am at Jantar Mantar, seeking the resignation of the Chief Election Commissioner, had even begun. Delhi Police has refused permission for the gathering, prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 are in force across New Delhi district, and entry and exit at eleven metro stations have been closed. On Gandhi Jayanti, the answer to a call for protest in the capital has been to switch off the internet for everyone who lives, works, trades and reports in its centre. We call for the immediate restoration of services. At the time of release of this statement, we have not been able to locate any suspension order published by the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Department of Telecommunications, the Government of NCT of Delhi or the Delhi Police. The public does not know who directed this shutdown, on what grounds, over what area, or until when. IFF is attempting to trace the order and will make it public as soon as we obtain a copy. In Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, (2020) 3 SCC 637, the Supreme Court held that speech and trade over the internet are protected under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, and that every suspension order must be published, reasoned, proportionate and limited in time. Under Section 20(2)(b) of the Telecommunications Act, 2023 and the Telecommunications (Temporary Suspension of Services) Rules, 2024, only the Union or State Home Secretary may issue such an order, for reasons recorded in writing. The order must be published and must specify the area, the services and a fixed duration and it may be passed only where no other reasonable means would serve. A shutdown announced to subscribers as lasting "till further notice", imposed before a single person had assembled, cannot be squared with these safeguards. It follows repeated suspensions around Jantar Mantar in July 2026. Switching off the network is becoming a routine response to protest in the national capital. IFF condemns the internet shutdown in parts of Central Delhi. We call upon the Government of India and the Government of NCT of Delhi to: 1. Immediately restore mobile internet services in Connaught Place and all affected parts of Central Delhi. 2. Publish the suspension order forthwith, together with the reasons recorded in writing. 3. Disclose the issuing authority, the precise areas and services covered, and the period of operation. 4. Place the order before the Review Committee within five days, as the Rules require, and make its findings public.

So this is where we got our gst from.

Man City’s entire defence and foreseeable future relies on this legal principle

🚨🇮🇪 Troy Parrott (24) for Ireland. 😳 That is INCREDIBLE. 👏

Arsène Wenger and his integrity is now trending in the darkest moment of the Premier League. “It is easy to be a revolutionary when the revolution is already happening, but far harder to stand up before it begins”.

Who made this chart!?

This entire City story - and especially the last stories of Etihad, Burnham and Khaldoon’s diplomatic immunity - crystallises why states and state actors should not be allowed own clubs The longer it goes, the more chaotic it gets independent.co.uk/sport/foot…

3rd consecutive day of a billion dollars in sale.. man

First in my bloodline to see 8 straight negative close on #Nifty Was that CAS top coincidence or something changed structurally?

Of course its Deloitte at the scene of the crime

Bloomberg warned weeks ago that political pressure would be applied from the UK to the UAE, and it is happening in front of your eyes. This is the very definition of sportswashing and why nation states should not be allowed to own football clubs. Andy Burnham cannot interfere.

The scale of Manchester City’s alleged cheating means serious punishment is the only way for the Premier League, one of Britain’s biggest global brands, to save its reputation economist.com/britain/2026/0…