🚨 CARS ARE COMPUTERS ON WHEELS. CYBERSECURITY MATTERS.
ABC’s investigation into the BYD Shark 6 is a wake-up call.
Importantly, this wasn’t a hacker sitting overseas randomly taking control of a BYD.
A cybersecurity researcher was given physical access to the vehicle for two weeks. During that investigation he reportedly discovered an internal access point that didn’t even require a password.
After reverse-engineering the system, he was then able to demonstrate substantial remote access from his laptop while the vehicle was being driven elsewhere.
He could track the vehicle, access the microphone, control parts of the infotainment system, operate the wipers and even switch the headlights off while the car was moving.
He could NOT access the brakes or cameras, which were better protected.
That distinction matters, but so does what he demonstrated.
Tesla has taken vehicle cybersecurity seriously for years, with dedicated security teams, bug-bounty programs and over-the-air security updates. But strong cybersecurity shouldn’t depend on which badge is on the bonnet.
Here’s the regulatory absurdity:
Australia has mandatory cybersecurity standards covering connected consumer devices such as smart doorbells, yet we don't have an equivalent mandatory automotive cybersecurity regime for connected cars.
Think about that.
We regulate the cybersecurity of a $100 internet-connected doorbell, while a $50,000 internet-connected computer on wheels can travel at 110 km/h carrying your family.
This isn’t about BYD, China or EVs.
Modern cars from EVERY manufacturer are becoming connected computers on wheels.
We need strong automotive cybersecurity standards that force everyone to meet the same high bar. 🔐🚗
abc.net.au/news/2026-09-21/b…