Fun is a serious thing.

Today, most agents operate with raw private keys, no identity and no limits @namera_ai unlocks the permission layer: smart accounts with strict policies to define what agents can spend, access and execute Join the waitlist at namera.ai 🥷

Farewell

One Last Thing. We put community first, and we believe in being transparent - especially now. We've published the full, sanitized version (to protect private information) of what we submitted to the SPP3 Marketplace RFP. The exact document - just redacted. You can read that version here: drive.google.com/file/d/1MWJ… What we pitched was a live marketplace with 3.6 million indexed names, 1,683 ETH of attributable revenue to the ENS DAO, a verified organic search position for "ENS Marketplace", and a concrete path to sustainability with four revenue streams. Here is what we were scored against. The comparison is the full rubric, side by side. Vision (weighted 2.97): 🔸 M1 Prior Delivery & Impact: 3.75 🔸 M2 Scope & Milestones: 2.38 🔸 M3 Revenue & Adoption: 3.00 🔸 M4 ENS / ENSv2 Readiness: 2.75 🔸 M5 Post-Award Sustainability: 2.38 Nomentum Labs / Grails (weighted 3.84): 🔸 M1 Prior Delivery & Impact: 4.38 🔸 M2 Scope & Milestones: 3.38 🔸 M3 Revenue & Adoption: 4.00 🔸 M4 ENS / ENSv2 Readiness: 4.12 🔸 M5 Post-Award Sustainability: 2.62 The document is public. The scores are public. You can now decide. We 🧡 all you ens'ers! Good luck. This is our last post. 🧡🧡🧡

We're shutting Vision down on August 31. Before we go, we want to correct the record on the SPP3 Marketplace RFP. 1. We had attributed revenue, on a public dashboard. We submitted our Dune dashboard showing 1,683 ETH of attributable revenue for the ENS DAO. The committee's recommendation says Grails was "the only applicant with attributed, independently reproducible marketplace impact." That is not accurate. We provided attributed, reproducible revenue too. We were told directly that Vision fell short because the committee "could not independently verify the comparative volume figures." That is a fair and specific reason. It is not the same as "we had no attributed revenue," which is how the aggregate rationale reads. We had years worth of contracts, not months and one. Happy for you to all to review the data that the DAO had > dune.com/meador/ens-vision-r… 2. We built the growth machinery, and got no credit for it. Grails has none of it, and wasn't penalized. Vision ships real discovery and trust infrastructure: SEO-indexed name pages, AEO, GDPR compliance, and the reach and community to bring new users in. That is exactly what a marketplace needs to grow an ecosystem registrations and renewals. Instead of crediting that, the committee's rationale docked the "growth services" and "marketing and education" side of applications. Grails, by the committee's own account, has none of that - no SEO, no GDPR, no AEO, no reach. Its marketing is its named biggest gap, and its growth plan "leans on shipping product rather than reaching new users." Yet it scored 4.00 on Revenue and Adoption, the highest-weighted metric. So the applicant who built the discovery, trust, and distribution machinery was penalized for it, and the applicant who has none of it was rewarded. That is not a case where we lost on growth. We lost despite having the growth infrastructure the ecosystem says it needs. Want to see all verifiable stats, from the top 3 marketplaces, on the last 8 months, it is all here > visionvibe.xyz/vvg How did we rank on Search - just enter "ENS Marketplace" and see. 3. Only one applicant cleared the threshold. The award threshold was 3.0 weighted. Nomentum cleared it at 3.84. The nearest applicants, including Vision as second highest, scored 2.97, just under the line. In an RFP funding a single award, only the incumbent cleared the bar, the same incumbent whose own referral data the committee cited when it proposed this RFP. Vision are not asking for the outcome to change. Vision is closing and that is final. But the record should reflect why it closed. We built a real marketplace with real attributed volume, and the growth machinery to grow it. We were not the only applicant with revenue, and the one that won has none of the reach infrastructure we were penalized for lacking. 🧡 Vision - over and out.

FOR SALE : Individual or whole package - vision.eth obi-wan.eth Fully functional website ensvision.com "to do" list and notes Build ideas X account @ensvision EU entity registered for web2 and web3 dev and consulting (great tax solution)

RT @furyan_eth: Dear friends, I am very sorry, Vision ensvision.com will be shut down on August 31st (in 4 days). The assets wil…

Are we back? 👀 verify.eth just sold for 8 ETH. crypto.eth, caller.eth, cupid.eth and others have been making offers across the namespace - and deals are actually completing. Multiple buyers. Real money. Completed sales. For months people said the ENS market was dead. Dead markets don't do 8 ETH deals (in addition to Crypto.eth earlier this week, let's not forget that one!) This is the signal. Pay attention. 🧡 ensvision.com #ENS #ETH #Web3

You don't have to build it all from scratch ENS Components is a free, production-ready React UI library for .eth registration, record editing and subname issuance 🤝 Try the playgrounds: enscomponents.com

ENS v2 Is Making Names Easier. Vision Is Bringing It to You. The next generation of the Ethereum Name Service is about one thing above all: making your name easier to own, manage, and use. Here is what the ENS team is building, and how Vision will bring every one of those improvements to its platform. The full piece covers four sections: 1. What the ENS Team Is Building - the universal resolver, role-based permissions baked into core, contract factories replacing monolithic shared contracts, and the collapse in gas costs for bulk operations, renewals, and subname creation. 2. What This Means for Your Name - lower cost, less manual record-keeping, and the flexibility to actually use subnames for events, DAO roles, and temporary projects. 3. How Vision Brings These Improvements to Its Platform - invisible migration (guided flow, batch migration, listings/offers survive), bulk operations as the default, subnames surfacing in search/portfolio/trading, and a single multi-wallet view. 4. The Bottom Line - protocol gets easier, Vision makes sure the experience does too. 🧡 ensvision.com

The market will not tell you this is working. The wallets will. Every number here is a real wallet transacting on-chain with ENSVision. Last week, 86 unique wallets transacted. The week before, 42. That is a +105% jump in 7 days - and it puts more unique wallets through this platform in a week than any rival sees in a month. Facts. Yesterday was our biggest single day of the year: 36 unique wallets. Not a campaign. Organic. Compounding. 89 loyal wallets transacted this month - wallets that come back, again and again. That loyalty is built on 2,980 founding wallets from 2025 who watched us go dark in September, and came back when we returned - over 244 of them, more that any other. Facts. Visions returning users are proof that we lead, where others follow. Growing is building on that base, amplifying that purpose and need for ENS in daily life. Growth is easy to claim. Loyalty is not. 🧡 ensvision.com #ENS #ETH #Web3

A free trial for you to experiment with ENS before securing your forever name, and an easy way for apps to protect their users with white-label subnames Coming with ENSv2 🥷

It's official ens.diamonds finished all security audits 🥳 Human audits: - @Nethermind team AI audits: - One Dollar Audit by @austingriffith - Audit Agent by @Nethermind - AI Auditor by @CertiK - Agent security by @v12sec - Pashov skills by @0xFireFist / @PashovAuditGrp Blown away by the quality and depth of AI audits btw. They surfaced these weird edge cases I never would've thought of. None were high risk, but still, super impressive! Ok, let the premium domain name hunting begins! 🔥 github.com/thenamespace/ens-…

Enter now and be in with chance of an extra year registration, thanks to Odie!

The way.eth offers are fun to watch. Easy content. But one wallet posting 200+ offers doesn't make an ENS summer. Not even a 55e buy. What makes an ENS summer is 200+ people each buying one name each because they finally see the potential. The bet on .eth isn't one big portfolio. It's a namespace that attracts capital - not one person's capital, but the kind that comes when people understand what they're buying. A name is an identity, a wallet, a payment rail, a DAO credential, a brand. A single point of entry to the whole onchain economy. That's the pitch. Not "fire off 200 offers and hope." It's "buy one name that matters and watch what happens." More people like way.eth. Not more way.eth. Are you a way.eth too? 🧡 ENSVision.com is where you start. #ENS #NameBidding

2,980 unique wallets used Vision in 2025. That's more than 2x the 1,269 unique wallets across all three ENS marketplaces combined today. Vision built a user base last year bigger than the entire active market is now. When we went dark, 78% of those wallets were never seen on another venue. Not for a competitor. They stayed put. 21% moved. 53% of them hit another venue first. When we returned January 5th: 🔸233 came back to Vision only. 🔸148 used us + another venue. 🔸24 use all three. And 311 joined who were never on Vision before. 44% of Vision today is net new. Old users stayed. Old users came home. New users found us. Zero ads. Organic growth. The base is still there. And it's growing. Our reach is beyond today’s community, it’s tomorrows users. 🧡 ensvision.com

Thanks to @DylanMeador Vision has Dune analytics dashboard where you can see our activity since 2022. It is 95% done, we will be adding some more data soon. - 27 264 ETH volume on secondary market - 130 124 marketplace sales - 36 945 unique users - 102 845 registrations dune.com/meador/ens-vision-r…

Quote a random ENS you hold - numbnuts.eth