Correct. But this isn’t a corporate turnaround. This is the United States of America.
I don’t think many people disagree with the need to reduce spending and the deficit. I certainly don’t.
What we don’t know is whose interests the people in charge are acting in.
With a corporate turnaround, everyone knows that all actions are for the benefit of the owner(s)
Who are the owners that are accruing the benefits in this turnaround Christopher ?
And over what time frame ?
And who are those who will be worse off and does anyone care about them ? What challenges will come as a result of moving quickly ?
These are all questions that would be answered in front of a board of directors.
In this case, there are 330m “directors “, most , like me, want to see the country succeed with the “new management “, but they also want some answers to their questions
Isn’t that fair ?
Excuses. Anyone who has done corporate turnarounds knows you have to be aggressive and make tough decisions, then adjust as you move forward. If anything, DOGE has been far too timid. The media hype of "chaos in the government" is the same as when Elon took over Twitter—hot air.