ً retweeted
6k coins (~$450m) in added shorts on the news that the thing with a 20% chance of passing didn't pass
20
12
414
35,843
Pons up, RH eco up. I don’t make the rules 🫠
6
6
134
5,703
ً retweeted
First of many T1 exchanges to list $PONS OKX are currently the 3rd biggest exchange by 24hr spot volume, just behind Bybit and ahead of Coinbase with $2.2B in 24hr trading volume. The rest will follow soon.
13
28
215
9,997
Coming to the conclusion that the best thing we could do for "AI Safety" would in fact be to vaporize Anthropic and zero out its equity
Who is METR the company that was just handed the keys to test and declare AI “safe”. Is there a weird connection? Why yes. Read more below, you are not going to believe this.
58
272
1,880
45,545
RT @levelsio: The good guys won this week
32
58
i am having SBF flashbacks reading this
I have conducted an audit of Anthropic's finances. What I have found is so shocking that I am calling for a Congressional investigation. Anthropic is not just seeking regulatory capture. It has built a regulatory capture machine that cannot be turned off. Structural financial incentives make it impossible for Anthropic -- I call it the Anthropic Network -- to turn off its own AI doom cycle. It starts with METR. Dario Amodei proposes "third-party evaluators" to assess the risk of Anthropic's models. He proposes METR for this purpose. But METR is financially dependent on the Anthropic's success -- specifically, on the explosive growth of more than $7 billion dollars in Anthropic stock. Dustin Moskovitz invested this stock into Good Ventures Foundation, where it represents the majority of that organization's portfolio. And GVF is the overwhelming funder of the entire Anthropic Network ecosystem. This stock was worth $500 million early last year. It is worth more than $7.7 billion just ~16 months later. METR -- and all of those building a career its parent organizations -- cannot afford to disrupt that growth. Because if Anthropic goes under, many of the organizations that fund METR go under as well. But if Anthropic succeeds, METR and its parent organizations become more richly financed to regulate AI -- something those at METR want very much. The "third-party evaluator" is not "third-party" at all. The evaluator is on Anthropic's payroll. If this were the end of it, that's bad. But that isn't all. The same organizations that fund METR also fund the many organizations, such as the Tarbell Center, that promote AI Doom. The Tarbell Center publishes AI Doom articles in The Verge, Science, LA Times, The Dispatch, TIME, and others. They are selling the problem, and then selling the solution to the problem -- from the same money pile: Anthropic's. All of these organizations are financially dependent on the same exploding $7 billion money pile. As Anthropic grows more and more powerful, its AI Doom Machine grows better and better financed -- louder and louder. Meanwhile, the regulatory regime seeded in METR grows larger to solve the increasingly loud -- now hysterical -- problem of AI Doom that the Anthropic Network itself created. From this standpoint, as Anthropic becomes more powerful, AI might be getting scarier, sure -- but the positive feedback loop also becomes more deafening -- independent of objective facts. This itself is an objective fact. The deafening AI Doom is part of an business model, that, as it expands, so too does the AI Doom messaging -- there is simply more money to do it. But the problem also goes in the other direction: If Anthropic dies, the Regulatory Regime and the AI Doom Machine are crippled or die. Neither METR nor Tarbell nor the other organizations in the Anthropic Network can allow that to happen. Hence, neither METR or the AI Doom Machine can be trusted to provide independent assessments of Anthropic's models or AI more broadly. They simply are not organizations independent of Anthropic. And Anthropic cannot detach itself from METR or Tarbell or countless other safety orgs (not shown here), either, because they drive hype for the models and the possibility of eventual regulatory capture, and Anthropic will not give that up willingly. What's more, the people at all of these organizations are all the same ecosystem, the same community. They just shuffle between organizations. The Anthropic Network is therefore, so long as it is successful, locked into a self-amplifying feedback loop inside an ideological monoculture. And that feedback loop is winning. That's what Jacob Coxon is. China is keeping messaging tight. That is why optimism for AI is so high in China. America has Anthropic: a massive company pushing anti-AI propaganda at a state level. Anthropic will either create hysteria until American AI slows down and China wins, or it will create fractures throughout American society with severe political consequences. Ironically, because of the structural financial incentives underpinning the Anthropic Network, it has become the same kind of self-amplifying virus that it fantasizes AI to become in the future -- while hiding its tracks just as carefully. It is the mirror of the same AI virus that it hypothesizes to consume America. Anthropic's business model, models itself after the very thing it claims to fear. Except Anthropic's ideology infects humans, not computers. Congress must investigate. Evidence and Github in next post. Then some supplementary figures.
51
56
1,127
157,529
I have conducted an audit of Anthropic's finances. What I have found is so shocking that I am calling for a Congressional investigation. Anthropic is not just seeking regulatory capture. It has built a regulatory capture machine that cannot be turned off. Structural financial incentives make it impossible for Anthropic -- I call it the Anthropic Network -- to turn off its own AI doom cycle. It starts with METR. Dario Amodei proposes "third-party evaluators" to assess the risk of Anthropic's models. He proposes METR for this purpose. But METR is financially dependent on the Anthropic's success -- specifically, on the explosive growth of more than $7 billion dollars in Anthropic stock. Dustin Moskovitz invested this stock into Good Ventures Foundation, where it represents the majority of that organization's portfolio. And GVF is the overwhelming funder of the entire Anthropic Network ecosystem. This stock was worth $500 million early last year. It is worth more than $7.7 billion just ~16 months later. METR -- and all of those building a career its parent organizations -- cannot afford to disrupt that growth. Because if Anthropic goes under, many of the organizations that fund METR go under as well. But if Anthropic succeeds, METR and its parent organizations become more richly financed to regulate AI -- something those at METR want very much. The "third-party evaluator" is not "third-party" at all. The evaluator is on Anthropic's payroll. If this were the end of it, that's bad. But that isn't all. The same organizations that fund METR also fund the many organizations, such as the Tarbell Center, that promote AI Doom. The Tarbell Center publishes AI Doom articles in The Verge, Science, LA Times, The Dispatch, TIME, and others. They are selling the problem, and then selling the solution to the problem -- from the same money pile: Anthropic's. All of these organizations are financially dependent on the same exploding $7 billion money pile. As Anthropic grows more and more powerful, its AI Doom Machine grows better and better financed -- louder and louder. Meanwhile, the regulatory regime seeded in METR grows larger to solve the increasingly loud -- now hysterical -- problem of AI Doom that the Anthropic Network itself created. From this standpoint, as Anthropic becomes more powerful, AI might be getting scarier, sure -- but the positive feedback loop also becomes more deafening -- independent of objective facts. This itself is an objective fact. The deafening AI Doom is part of an business model, that, as it expands, so too does the AI Doom messaging -- there is simply more money to do it. But the problem also goes in the other direction: If Anthropic dies, the Regulatory Regime and the AI Doom Machine are crippled or die. Neither METR nor Tarbell nor the other organizations in the Anthropic Network can allow that to happen. Hence, neither METR or the AI Doom Machine can be trusted to provide independent assessments of Anthropic's models or AI more broadly. They simply are not organizations independent of Anthropic. And Anthropic cannot detach itself from METR or Tarbell or countless other safety orgs (not shown here), either, because they drive hype for the models and the possibility of eventual regulatory capture, and Anthropic will not give that up willingly. What's more, the people at all of these organizations are all the same ecosystem, the same community. They just shuffle between organizations. The Anthropic Network is therefore, so long as it is successful, locked into a self-amplifying feedback loop inside an ideological monoculture. And that feedback loop is winning. That's what Jacob Coxon is. China is keeping messaging tight. That is why optimism for AI is so high in China. America has Anthropic: a massive company pushing anti-AI propaganda at a state level. Anthropic will either create hysteria until American AI slows down and China wins, or it will create fractures throughout American society with severe political consequences. Ironically, because of the structural financial incentives underpinning the Anthropic Network, it has become the same kind of self-amplifying virus that it fantasizes AI to become in the future -- while hiding its tracks just as carefully. It is the mirror of the same AI virus that it hypothesizes to consume America. Anthropic's business model, models itself after the very thing it claims to fear. Except Anthropic's ideology infects humans, not computers. Congress must investigate. Evidence and Github in next post. Then some supplementary figures.
1,547
9,642
34,046
6,565,322
Vlad will wanna continue scaling this profitable business
A bet on $PONS is a bet that activity on RH continues to scale. If u think RH chain is done here esp after making ~$12M of profits in the first 2 months of it going live… Idk how else to clearly put it
7
13
110
9,362
In-kind redemption and voting are coming for Robinhood Stock Tokens
With Stock Tokens TVL reaching over $170M and nearly $50B in DEX volume on the Robinhood Chain, we are getting more questions about what they are and how they work. All Robinhood Stock Tokens are backed 1:1 with real shares in secure custody. And Stock Tokens receive the economic equivalent of dividends and corporate actions returns reinvested into their holdings. In other words, when a new Stock Token is minted, we buy a real share of the company at the same time. What about in-kind redemption and voting rights? Not yet, but they’re coming. Step one is to scale adoption of Stock Tokens. We’re actively working on redemptions for shares 1:1 with voting for eligible Stock Token holders on the roadmap. We know how to do this well: we run a shareholder engagement platform, Say by Robinhood, which allows shareholders to participate in actions like voting. What about the technology? We built Stock Tokens to be composable, which allows developers to build new innovative offerings like we have seen the past few weeks, with many that we have yet to discover. What am I the most excited about? Billions of people in the world don't have access to U.S. investment assets. With Stock Tokens, that era is ending. Any eligible customer with a phone and an internet connection can now get exposure to the most exciting market in the world.
1,252
609
4,940
1,506,945
this is Dario and sama's worst nightmare - A law firm buying Nvidia servers. Latham & Watkins is building an in-house AI stack.. this is US’s second-largest law firm with $8.3 Billion in revenue last year And now it has - - Nvidia hardware it controls - open-weight models it can fine tune - proprietary legal data it is trusted to protect - infrastructure only Latham employees can access A law firm has decades of contracts, negotiations, client context, legal reasoning, and institutional knowledge. They dont want to give all of that away to OpenAI or Anthropic in exchange for expensive tokens.. And on top of that - risk their data being used to train frontier models.. This will happen more and more now.. The big AI labs have no moat.. nothing protecting their largest customers from moving on.. The biggest companies in the world will - - own the compute - own the data - own the workflow - fine tune the model around their business - switch providers when the pricing or quality changes Dario and sama want to make this illegal by bringing in regulation.. and become the AI overlords..
Latham & Watkins, the 2nd largest US law firm, is buying Nvidia hardware to fine-tune open weights in-house. Open weights + proprietary data + local compute = enterprise sovereign AI stack.
354
1,885
13,569
1,345,698
ً retweeted
$PONS buyback splitter has just been replenished with $2.4M and is in overdrive once again... $32.5K is getting TWAP'd into $PONS and burned every 15 minutes. 225K tokens burned in the last hour (0.02% of TOTAL supply). $130K an hour. At this pace $PONS will hit 31% of TOTAL supply burned in the next 5 hours. Meanwhile Loracle is still closing his short and has 26.87M tokens to buyback (circa $16M worth) Insane amount of buy pressure for $PONS on both spot and perp.
14
30
227
10,833
Today two months ago, we launched @ponsdotfamily In just 60 days - the community token went from 0 to $950M (ATH). In just 60 days - the creators on our platform earned over $110M In just 60 days - the protocol accumulated a whooping $30M in fees in which over 80% went to buybacks and burns. In just 60 days my account - as well as the pons account grew by over 50,000 followers. In just 60 days, Pons became one of the biggest startups in the entire world, and one of the fastest to reach $100M ARR in less than 2 months. In just 60 days, Pons became a top 5 crypto protocol by revenue. In just 60 days, WE made the trenches more fun. This isn’t the end - it’s just the beginning. But without YOU this wouldn’t have been possible. So thank YOU for being a part of the family. Looking forward to many more days - together. Thank you, Ozzy & Team
571
197
2,036
182,224
$PONS still made ~$1M of revenue today Sep 13th seems like revenue numbers is starting to base out around the 800k-1M range which is very encouraging to see still early ofc, but given how much attention has been splitting between RH <> SOL eco the past week, im genuinely surprised to see rev holding up this strong imo market right now is battling between profit takers from buyers way lower vs new entrants trying to price the revenue story. a few more weeks of this revenue and confidence will reflect higher
25
32
262
52,707
ً retweeted
2 months, $12,000,000,000. The leading Robinhood launchpad, powered by @Uniswap v4
258
122
1,490
100,666
ً retweeted
God forbid you go to bed early on Sunday The GREATEST GAME Long $eth $sol $hype $lit
*TRUMP AGREES TO NEW BIPARTISAN ETHICS PROVISION IN MASSIVE CRYPTO BILL, GOP AIDE SAYS: AP *TRUMP AGREED TO CRYPTO ETHICS PROVISIONS IN A SWEEPING BILL HEADED FOR A VOTE *THE UPDATED BILL REQUIRES DIVESTING OR PLACING CRYPTO INTERESTS INTO A BLIND TRUST
17
12
403
84,210
Stilll early l, but once passed, miners and stakers will sell less short term immediately because their rewards only become taxable once they sell, not the moment they receive the rewards. A lot of things moving this week. Clarity cloture vote, tax rules, FOMC, SEC new regulations. In that order.
BREAKING: 🇺🇸 U.S. House Ways and Means Committee schedules Sept. 16 markup for crypto tax rules, according to Bloomberg.👀
5
8
91
18,552
ً retweeted
Please meet jubjub. Find the lore, win the🛡️ $ZEC
395
214
1,257
560,262
David Sacks makes a good point. If Dario and Sam think the leading AI labs are moving too fast and need to slow down, why don’t they just, you know, slow down? Seriously, you guys are the leading AI labs, just get on the phone with each other and agree to slow down a bit - problem solved. Why do they need an act of congress in order for them to slow down when they’re both the CEOs of their companies? It’s almost as if there’s some other motivation.
201
261
3,871
202,522
Translation: our gross margins are getting competed down to 0 by open source models and our capex burn rate is too high. Let’s maintain our margins with regulatory capture, ban open source models, and slow down the capex arms race. All with a virtue signaling cherry on top.
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
281
2,529
17,339
1,881,191
just buy zcash:native and hold until $10k?
42
11
176
6,542