I wrote a book and it’s available for preorder today. hachettebookgroup.com/titles…

Anthony Albanese has unleashed a torrent of bots and leftist extremists onto right leaning population in Australia today. Immediately - Vile, dangerous and inciting language used by LEFT WING EXTREMISTS against right-leaning Australians claiming even that it’s because of @PaulineHansonOz that Haines was run down with a Landcruiser Sorry Leftivists - this is ANOTHER left wing extremist. The right in Australia are still at 0 for violence against Aussies. Now you know why the PM was so sheepish when he made his address this afternoon. It’s one of his own kind, empowered by his own vile rhetoric and activism. Here’s the ALLEGED account/owner, with matching rego. A hard left extremist/activist, multiple priors. Known to police and AFP.

BOM, the Bureau of Meteorology, REPEATEDLY and ALWAYS told us that its RAW data is RAW data Yet an independent forensic audit has found months of data copied and pasted from other months 40 years apart The BOM lies about temperature And, the BOM has NEVER produced the scientific evidence that Carbon Dioxide from HUMAN activity drives temperature and needs to be cut The BOM lies about natural climate variability As always, we the people PAY

So it turns out that @AnikaWells, the lady who wants to censor her political enemies at home and the entire Internet globally, lied about her misuse of public money for personal travel. And it's not even her first time. No wonder these lying crooks are desperate for censorship.

Bowen is in trouble, Net Zero is dead, a reckoning is coming. Here's the truth: In 2024 just 2.9% of global energy needs were met by wind and solar. After more than $5.5 Trillion USD in investments globally. In this video I go DEEP down a data rabbit hole and bring you ALL the data, AND the sources (see below) to arm you with the undeniable proof that Net Zero is dead, and Chris Bowen has been lying this whole time. It all gets a bit technical, but by the most GENEROUS methods of counting energy (the one that makes wind and solar look the BEST), over the last 10 years COMBINED wind and solar have provided about 3.8% of the globes energy, but over the same period they've attracted nearly 20% of global INVESTMENT! What does that mean? It means the lie that 'firmed wind and solar are the cheapest' isn't just a lie here in Australia, it's a lie everywhere on earth, and this reality is fast catching up to the fantasy. All the sources are below if you want to join me DEEP down this rabbit hole... But if you appreciate that I've done the work so that YOU don't have to then PLEASE SUPPORT THE TOPHER PROJECT by buying me a coffee or ten, and checking out my books, DVDs, and all my merch here: store.topherfield.com/ And don't miss out on the BLACKOUT MERCH DROP here: store.topherfield.com/collec… Here's the full list of REFERENCES for the data and graphs provided in the video: References: 1. International Energy Agency (2026), World Energy Investment 2026 — Datafile, World sheet, values in billion USD (2025, MER); 2026 values are IEA estimates. IEA, Paris. Licence: CC BY 4.0. iea.org/data-and-statistics/… 2. International Energy Agency (2026), World Energy Investment 2026 (report). iea.org/data-and-statistics/… 3. Energy Institute (2025), Statistical Review of World Energy; world primary energy consumption by source (substitution method), 2004–2024. energyinst.org/statistical-r… 4. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2025), International Energy Data; combined with the Energy Institute data for total primary energy. eia.gov/opendata/index.php#b… 5. Ember (2026), Yearly Electricity Data; world wind and solar generation, including 2025. ember-energy.org/data/yearly… 6. Sources 3–5 as compiled by Our World in Data, energy-data repository (the file used for these calculations). github.com/owid/energy-data 7. Frankfurt School–UNEP Centre / BloombergNEF, Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment (2004–2019 series), via Our World in Data, "Investment in renewable energy, by technology". ourworldindata.org/grapher/i… 8. Frankfurt School–UNEP Centre / BNEF (2019), Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2019, fact sheet. frankfurt-school.de/en/inter… I've done the work so you don't have to! A coffee would be MUCH appreciated!

This governments got to go.

Someone buy this woman a very large wine… a bottle… the whole fucking vineyard…👏👏👏👏👏

Global boiling is much a grave threat … they have to fiddle historical data to try and trick you that it’s true. The manipulation is happening on an industrial scale. Major report in The Australian today.

MORE BOM DATA FUDGING EXPOSED The Bureau of Meteorology has been caught out transcribing raw written weather records incorrectly onto their databases. For years I have tried to expose the data tampering by the Bureau of Meteorology in order to distort climate records. I’ve been constantly ridiculed throughout my political career as being unqualified to comment on the issue because I’m not a “scientist”. Yet this has never been about science. It’s about record keeping plain and simple, and the integrity of those records. Something that I was qualified to speak about given my 25 years in managing financial records and studying statistics up to Masters level. Whats particularly frustrating about this is that this isn’t the first time the BOM has exposed for fudging records and yet they are continually allowed to get away with it. This includes the media continuing to report their records used to promote “climate change” as though they are the gospel. If you want to fight this corruption then sign up to Peoplefirstparty.au today. •••••••••••••••• “A forensic audit has uncovered false readings and widespread errors in the Bureau of Meteorology's raw climate data, including blocks of temperature readings copied and pasted across different years and seasons, raising questions about the integrity of records used for climate analysis. Anomalies in the BOM's online temperature records ranged from whole months of duplicated data decades apart to statistically impossible whole weeks of identical temperatures to one decimal place. The data errors are not just historical, with the audit, conducted with pattern-recognition software, finding more than 40 per cent of the flagged entries or events dated after 1990. Mr Berger said none of the findings required any knowledge of climate science but were purely data-integrity failures that would disqualify any dataset in any other field of science. Mr Berger undertook the audit with retired scientist Geoffrey Sherrington who said he lived by the motto "trust, but verify". "We are concerned that government policies like net zero are informed by data represented as raw and unadjusted when under investigation by our forensic pattern analysis programs, that is incorrect," Mr Sherrington said.”