Got my Oasis tickets, great seats but tbh can't even be bothered to go. And no, I won't be selling them, they are going straight in the BIN.

A poem for Reo Hatate: You were are Japanese lad Never done a thing bad You wore the green hoops proudly Away stadions were rowdy There shall never be another like you You were so good at hearts away, you should of scored 2 💚

If the Rugby players could do it in 1981, surely the Soccer players can do it in 2026! #StopTheGame

Ireland to fulfil Israel fixtures after player vote as Bazunu tells squad he will not play irishtimes.com/sport/soccer/… This is what balls look like.

"I hear you're a bit of a racist now Jim"

Yeah nothing to do with us your lives are fucking desperate it was Putin all along, these Cunts are actually worse than Reform blaming the immmmmigants.

Dick the diplomat building bridges.

Adam Curtis doesn’t have to do much work for clips now, just has to add a Yo La Tengo b side and say ‘this is the story of how..’

Hang this in the Louvre #RNLI #StopInvasion #StopTheBoats

Myra Hindley and Ian Brady slip down to no2 apparently.

Hmmmm.....are 'I' phones akin to 'pagers' D'ya think?.....

This is the United Kingdom’s Defence Secretary. Are you starting to get it?

Most funny exchange on British sanctions against Israel award winner

Someone is still smarting at rejection by a Romanian

Jason Arday got his job because of the colour of skin, unlike me who got my job because my dad is a Viscount/CEO of a super market/Mates with the owner of a news network/In the Epstein Files. Signed, just about every Journalist in the UK.

‘I think that’s different’ Yes love, you would do

Oh here we go. Academics were complaining about Cofnas's appointment on the grounds of his 'abysmal' shoddy work when he was employed by Ghent, well before the Arday affair. Oh come on. This guy is an imposter. thecanary.co/skwawkbox/2026/…

After the death of Jason Arday, Will Self asks what happens when newspapers, platforms, editors and audiences become components in a machine nobody admits to controlling. The public interest is not the same thing as the public being interested.

The strongest and most widely accepted criticism was that a psychiatrist should not publicly associate a named living individual with a psychiatric concept (even a descriptive, non-DSM one like 'pseudologia fantastica') without having examined them, taken a history, or obtained consent. Pemberton repeatedly caveated that he had never met Arday and was speaking “generally.” Critics argue this does not fully neutralise the issue: by naming Arday, reviewing the public allegations against him, and then explaining a recognised pattern of elaborate self-mythologising, the column effectively invites readers to apply that pattern to him. Professional norms (reflected in GMC Good Medical Practice principles about working within competence and the spirit of the American “Goldwater Rule”) discourage this kind of media commentary precisely because it risks error, stigma, and misuse of clinical authority. The most substantive criticisms, then, are not that the general psychology of elaborate, self-reinforcing fabrications is invented or baseless. They are that a practising psychiatrist should not publicly map that pattern onto a specific named person on the basis of incomplete media evidence, especially under the professional constraints that apply to doctors and in the charged circumstances of this case.