These proposals are fine. But dont pretend they are whats needed to address housing costs systemically. We need real solutions and those are hard to effecuate. These are election platform platitudes and therefore easy.
🏡🤝A GRAND BARGAIN FOR HOUSING AND LOCAL CONTROL: Today, I set forth a comprehensive plan to improve housing affordability and protect local control of zoning & decision making.
My three-pronged plan is vital in communities like Simsbury and others, where they are facing a series of proposed developments, including an 8-30g development over 600 units, without any local approval or buy-in.
After decades of state government driving up the cost of housing and overriding local policy, we need a change in direction.
➡️ REDUCE & CAP PROPERTY TAXES: Roll back unfunded mandates on municipalities; Reform tax exemptions for large solar arrays, universities, and hospital systems; Create predictable funding streams for towns & cities that increase with costs
➡️REDUCE BUILDING COSTS & EXPAND SUPPLY: Eliminate licensing fees, streamline licensing, and lift the cap on apprenticeships; Reduce needless red tape in building codes; Streamline permitting processes; Encourage small-scale housing development
➡️PROTECT LOCAL CONTROL: Eliminate or roll back 8-30g and H.B. 8002 supported by Gov. Lamont; Place size limits on 8-30g developments; Allow for “Housing Growth Zones” to earn 8-30g relief
With the right leadership, we can reach a grand bargain in our state that promotes responsible housing growth that’s focused on affordability and prioritizes local zoning and decision making.