Love wine, chocolate and reading. Freedom loving Independent. we need smaller government. RT’s are not endorsements

Indiana, USA
Pinned Tweet
Both sexes need to stop competing against each other but celebrate each other’s strengths, recognize similarities and crossovers, realize there are outliers and stop belittling the other group in order to assert dominance. Civilization is best served when we balance each other. Both sexes have the capacity to be good, kind, empathetic, intelligent, clever, brilliant, caring, vile, evil, and stupid. In this, they are truly equal.
9
10
40
4,682
Does the Black Lives Matter movement know this? Do the purple-haired activists who vowed to defend human rights know this? And if they do know, does it make any difference? Probably not; human rights and Black rights are just a mask hiding what truly motivates them: hatred.
15
91
225
4,423
Tears choke me as I read what my Iranian friends are writing - people who fight for their lives every single day against one of the most brutal regimes in the world. I’m so glad Netanyahu chose to speak for them too, to expose the world’s hypocrisy and its refusal to look at the horrors unfolding in Iran - and, above all, to show the Iranian people that they are not alone.
90
423
2,042
15,840
Kathryn retweeted
The Islamic State is at work in Canada. Don't worry about the Jews. How long till an October 7 style attack in Toronto or Montréal? Wake up.
184
456
1,545
17,086
Alleged sanity post about how we One Nation supporters are just a bunch of hateful morons, so I felt compelled to reply. I was standing in a supermarket queue recently when a middle-aged woman put half her groceries back. Nothing extravagant. Meat. Fruit. A few things for the kids. “I’ll get them next week,” she said. Then she tapped her card and waited to see if it declined. And that tells you something about Australia’s supposed “mad rush to the right” that apparently hasn’t occurred to Paul Williams. Maybe people didn’t suddenly lose their empathy. Maybe they ran out of it. For years Australians have been told to care about everybody and everything except the consequences of government policy on their own lives. Care about the international student. Care about population growth. Care about every new identity group. Care about the latest symbolic political cause. Care about changing the language you use. Care about achieving ideological targets. But struggling to pay your mortgage? Can’t find a rental? Watching your electricity bill climb? Can’t get your kid into a doctor? Sitting in traffic while infrastructure fails to keep pace with population growth? Worried that your children may never afford a home? Apparently asking whether government policy contributed to any of that makes you selfish. That's not empathy. It’s a demand for empathy to flow in one direction only. And Australians are exhausted. Cost of living is currently the number-one issue Australians nominate, followed by housing. Immigration has also returned to the top five. Even the ABC's analysis of One Nation voters found cost of living is a major concern, while immigration distinguishes them more strongly from other voting groups. So perhaps instead of diagnosing millions of Australians as stupid, poorly educated, hateful and lacking the emotional development of a five-year-old, it might be worth asking why they are angry. Maybe people moving away from the political left aren't saying: “I don't care about other people.” Maybe they're saying: “For decades, when the consequences landed on me, you didn't care either.” You don't get to spend years dismissing people's concerns about housing, migration, energy, crime, cost of living and social cohesion — then suddenly rediscover “empathy” when those same people start voting against you. And this isn't some tiny fringe that can simply be sneered away. Recent polling has shown extraordinary disruption to Australia's traditional party system, with One Nation recording support comparable with or above the major parties in some polls. Even the ABC has interviewed migrants now considering One Nation because they believe the major parties have failed on housing, infrastructure, migration and cost-of-living pressures. Perhaps that's the story worth investigating. Not: “Why have Australians become horrible?” But: “What happened that made so many Australians conclude the political establishment stopped listening to them?” People aren't obligated to keep voting for a system they believe is failing them just to demonstrate that they're compassionate. And for many Australians, One Nation's rise represents something the political establishment hasn't given them for a very long time: Hope that the two-party duopoly can actually be disrupted. You can call those voters selfish. You can call them ignorant. You can tell them they're on the “wrong side of history”. Or you could finally listen to them. Because perhaps Australians haven't lost their empathy at all. Perhaps they've simply stopped accepting the proposition that caring about everyone else requires continually sacrificing themselves. -Not a professor at a Uni, just a girl hungry for political change, and a Government to take their boot off our necks.
Sanity in Murdoch publications is rare so should be shared 👇🏽 Opinion: Preposterous political ploy selfish Australians are falling for I was standing in a shop queue recently when a middle-aged bloke – clearly angry at life and wanting the world to know it – picked up a collection tin for women’s cancer research. “Why is it always about women?” he groaned. “Why don’t they have anything for men?” And that tells you everything you need to know about Australia’s mad rush to the loony right of politics. First, it shows a wilful ignorance of reality. Cancer research affecting males (exclusively or primarily) actually receives more funding than that affecting females. Second, it suggests a lack of both logic and empathy. Too many people cannot see – sometimes literally – beyond their own noses. Even a child knows proof of non-existence is not found in an object’s absence. Indeed, a lack of empathy is often a function of a poor education. Either way, too many Australians lack the basic empathy to see another point of view. Are striking workers greedy, or might they have a legitimate complaint about pay and conditions? The Swiss theorist Jean Piaget – pounded into every teaching student – found that well-rounded humans should be empathetic by age five. But I guess Piaget didn’t spend a lot of time in Australia, where debate rails between kicking out foreign students (despite their $55bn annual boost to the local economy) and dumping protections for LGBTQIA+ people whose rights in no way subtract from yours. Think about it. Does a beer manufacturer supporting trans people’s rights make your day harder? And would your daily life really be worse if a First Nations Voice to Parliament offered advice, on Indigenous matters only, that politicians could so easily reject? What is it about our inability to see ourselves in the shoes of another person – someone even more vulnerable than us who, in all likelihood, is also the battling the cost of living? As hard as life is for you, there are countless for whom it’s much harder. Every day there are Australians – law-abiding taxpayers who love their kids and their pets and who keep their head down – who are forced to battle racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia and cruel stereotypes around disability, autism and mental illness. And it’s through this preposterous hatred of others that populist politicians hoodwink angry Australians – just for votes and the election-funding dollars that come with them. And we’re falling for it. So you’re not alone if you’ve noticed people just don’t care any more. Studies have found human empathy across Western civilisation has almost halved in recent decades, fuelled initially by the individualistic, dog-eat-dog free market of the 1980s, and accelerated by social media networks that position us literally at the centre of our own digital world. Who cares about the international student – paying dearly to study at an Australian university in order to build a better life back home – as long as we can post pictures of our holiday. Be honest, when was the last time you dropped cash into a charity tin or tips jar? I’ve been thinking about blinkered views since the recent student protests against One Nation. Public comment was appalling in its opposition not just to what young people were saying, but in students’ right to say it. We have the right to respectfully express counter-opinions indicating where protesters are wrong on logic, but we can’t demand others be stripped of a right to lawful protest. I guarantee public opinion would be very different if young One Nation members marched in support of Australia Day or the flag. While there are legitimate questions around school students being off-campus during school hours, Article 15 of the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child protect the right of under-18s to protest lawfully. And shouting slogans is lawful when not inciting violence. To deny this is to deny a long history of young people changing the world for the better. I’m old enough to remember grey-haired politicians warning that university students were dangerous communists for opposing a Vietnam War they said was vital to Australia’s security. Look how that turned out. Young people have led anti-apartheid demonstrations in South Africa despite the risk of injury and death and, more recently, have been at the forefront of climate change and same-sex-marriage movements. In short, young people – so easily painted as know-nothing bludgers with no life experience – have always been on the right side of history. So take off your blinkers and pop on your empathy specs, and see what side of history you want to be on. - Paul Williams is an associate professor at Griffith University
30
76
363
14,948
Hasan Piker is teaching young Americans to hate their country and believe it needs to be dismantled. Is this really who Democrats want defining their party?
126
805
3,560
26,033
Kathryn retweeted
🇫🇷🇬🇧 CAUGHT: NGO Trafficking Migrants Across France VP Journalist @FranklySpeakP CAUGHT Opal'Exil NGO staff carrying MIGRANT children on their shoulders toward dinghies bound for Britain. They removed their hi-vis jackets when they saw us filming. By then it was too late.
🇫🇷 Small boat migrants have FLOODED the French coastline today. VP reporters @JamesHarvey2503 and @FranklySpeakP have had ROCKS and RUBBISH thrown at them as they document both MIGRANTS and TRAFFICKERS. More footage to follow.
212
1,449
4,407
504,290
Kathryn retweeted
America is better when Democrats are NOT in power So I'll be voting to keep it that way
133
588
4,023
21,508
Kathryn retweeted
This the the truth that the Pro Palestine crowd continues to ignore and acts like doesn’t exist. It’s not convenient to the narrative they want to push, so it gets ignored.
114
1,047
4,361
44,964
Kathryn retweeted
Menstruating people is a lexical burka designed to disappear women
L’expression « Personnes menstruées » est une burka lexicale destinée à faire disparaître le mot FEMMES. Cette novlangue est indigne de @gouvernementFR. #1984
12
166
830
10,884
Kathryn retweeted
“I am a Saudi woman, and my family forces me to wear the *niqab*. I fought against this and refused, only to be barred from leaving the house and denied access to money. I have participated in several campaigns, but there has been no response. I hope a decision is issued to ban the *niqab* and stop forcing Saudi or Arab women to wear it; many women are effectively imprisoned in their homes because of it—it is nothing more than a tool of oppression.”
1
23
128
2,982
Kathryn retweeted
Woke sports media is becoming impossible to take seriously. @dandakich calls out those insane dorks.
3
6
24
1,601
Kathryn retweeted
Replying to @benonwine
3
9
147
Kathryn retweeted
Imagine your daughter bringing these two scrote bags home…. Be Honest how would you react?
221
94
397
43,013
Kathryn retweeted
🚨 WHERE IS DONALD TRUMP!? HELP! CAIR’S “GRAND JIHAD” TO DESTROY AMERICA FROM WITHIN WAS EXPOSED - SO WHY IS IT STILL OPERATING IN AMERICA? People always ask: “With all the court documents, whistleblowers, and federal evidence - why hasn’t CAIR been banned?” That question should shake every American awake. If we can’t even ban a group with terror ties and open hostility to this country, how are we going to defeat the Islamic threat growing on our soil? 🎙️ Listen to my Friend and National Security Expert Chris Gaubatz, who infiltrated CAIR undercover - this was NINE YEARS AGO: “I worked inside CAIR’s national office. What I witnessed was a Hamas front - actively working to undermine U.S. security from within.” “CAIR was named in the largest terror-financing trial in U.S. history - the Holy Land Foundation case - as part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee.” “They placed interns in congressional offices, coordinated with Bin Laden operatives, and tipped off a terror suspect using a classified federal database.” Their internal memo says it all: 🔺 A kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within… so that Islam is victorious over all other religions.” That’s civilizational jihad - and it’s already here! Chris’s testimony is backed by federal court evidence. What he uncovered is nothing short of a domestic threat network using Sharia as war doctrine - embedding itself in law enforcement, education, media, and policymaking. WHERE IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT - WHY ARE THEY NOT PROTECTING AMERICA FROM THIS TERROR-TIED ORGANIZATION!?
🟥 WARNING, AMERICA - WE ARE BEING CONQUERED! CAIR - designated a terrorist organization by the UAE and with documented terror ties - is openly building an entire generation of soldiers. They brag on film that by 2050, they are working to produce: • 100,000 journalists • 100,000 filmmakers • 100,000 lawyers & policy operatives • 100,000 potential candidates & officeholders THAT IS 400,000 PEOPLE TARGETED FOR POSITIONS OF INFLUENCE AND POWER. And those candidates can now be supported by CAIR’s new Super PAC, which we first exposed in Feb. 2025. And what is the GOP doing while this Islamic machine, with documented terror ties, maps out a 25-year plan to penetrate media, law, government, academia, and culture? Talking. Holding hearings. Drafting “ban CAIR / ban political Islam” bills that will never pass. Tweeting. “Expressing concern.” Meanwhile, CAIR is: — Preaching the plan from the pulpit — Launching the pipeline through mosques — Supporting races with a federal Super PAC — They started with Zohran Mamdani in NYC and now they are supporting Jihadis ALL across the country! This is not some passing trend. It is a 25-year blueprint for power and the machine to execute it is already running. America is sleepwalking while an Islamic bloc builds itself, in the open, to dominate the country our children will inherit. Will any government agency examine whether using a tax-exempt mosque and a tax-exempt nonprofit to build a political machine violates 501(c)(3) law? 400,000 JOURNALISTS, FILMMAKERS, LAWYERS, POLICY OPERATIVES, CANDIDATES AND OFFICEHOLDERS. THEY ARE TELLING YOU WHAT THEY ARE BUILDING. CALL YOUR LEADERS. DEMAND ACTION NOW! WHERE IS THE GOP!?
304
3,726
5,814
126,975
Hey women! Guess what? According to Misogynist Extraordinaire Owen Jones, if you choose not to sleep with bisexual men, you're biphobic.
163
105
1,175
93,236
The de-evolution of political discussion in the last 20 years
3
21
74
3,383
Kathryn retweeted
I think a world without Bill Gates would look radically different. Imagine if Jobs hadn’t been pushed out of Apple, if Apple had become the standard, and if “Think Different” had become everyone’s mantra. We might be living in a completely different world. In my view, Bill Gates has been a net negative for humanity—by far.
🚨 Bill Gates predicts that AI could “drive events that cause a billion deaths”
43
49
272
7,319
🇬🇧 Meanwhile in London Just look at the sheer hate & abject disgust they have in their eyes for this Disabled English Woman simply trying to get by. When they become the majority it’s over.
HJB News
28
328
1,199
28,897
Kathryn retweeted
This just gave me chills. This is a historical and theological warning about the danger of Islam rising, not just in the United States, but the entire world. •What was once the operational base for the Apostle Paul’s ministry is now 98% Muslim. •Islam traces their lineage back to Abraham’s son, Ishmael. •“They will make you outcasts from the synagogue, but an hour is coming for everyone who kills you to think that he is offering service to God.” John 16:2 •“Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.” Revelation 20:4
Erikaaa
8
174
563
9,289
Kathryn retweeted
Cambridge University offers world a seminar on "Responsibility Avoidance Tactics in the Modern Era."
1
6
286