I think this is actually really wrong & it's why Derive is so mispriced. I'll reiterate: Options are different products to Perpetual Futures
Perps work like simple multipliers on linear returns. This comes with path risk, liquidations are required to preserve protocol solvency. It also comes with a funding mechanism to incentivize a balanced book. There's no denying these are extremely retail & trader friendly, but given you're only trading leverage on a single price at a single moment in time, they're actually pretty unsophisticated
Options represent the right to buy or sell an asset at some price at some point in time, instead of one single instrument per ticker like perps, there's an entire field of strike-date pairs for a given ticker. This introduces a lot of complexity and fragments liquidity, but what you get in return is **convexity**. Further out of the money options pay out at an increased rate if they come into the money, all while losing less money if the trade moves against you (all without liquidation risk). This payout structure is unique to options
And I won't even touch on the portfolio value of selling calls & puts for yield, building multi-leg strategies, spreads, hedging, etc... but you can get very very sophisticated if you know what you're doing... like Wall Street does. There's a reason the options market is in the QUADRILLIONS !!!!
I feel like 99 out of 100 tradfi traders who use options primarily would switch to perps in a second if they had easy access and understood what they are