It's called Brown University for a reason
I was invited to Brown University last night to "talk to students"... but the moment I asked about Charlie Kirk the entire thing got shut down.
I have never seen students so terrified to speak. If a conversation like this is not allowed... there is no point in going to college.
4
572
͏ retweeted
Pervert alert. @RepWeiner is back on twitter. All girls under the age of 18, block him immediately.
3,352
24,664
61,968
?
To strengthen Switzerland's cybersecurity, the government has tasked the defence department with drafting a new federal act regulating digital products, data and infrastructure. The law will be based on the European Cyber Resilience Act. admin.ch/de/newnsb/zX9oNK8tu… @vbs_ddps
1
4
642
͏ retweeted
The entire field of ethics is kind of bullshit. 99% of it is predicated on the assumption that pain and suffering ought to be eliminated axiomatically because it somehow opposes life. Very little of it seriously interrogates the instrumental and necessary role of unpleasantries.
15
6
121
2,996
͏ retweeted
JUST IN: Family sues Texas daycare over allegedly operating a “child fight club.”
377
563
7,447
1,662,352
͏ retweeted
Those who say Nock copied Pearl is pure comedy.
Let's look at the facts, backed by their own recent announcements:
1. Nock launched May 2025 with ZK-PoW as its native core. Pearl launched April 2026 with matmul.
2. Pearl's AMA tried to downplay ZK integration as a "potential application." But look at their official recent announcement : they are now formally collaborating with @attestable to integrate ZK proofs and provide "cryptographic assurance that an entity actually ran a computation."
3. This is a direct admission. Pearl's base consensus cannot verify computational provenance on its own. They are now bolting on the exact ZK proof-of-inference architecture that Nockchain built from day one.
4. And the technical evasion? The AMA couldn't provide a numeric prefill-vs-decode or dense-vs-MoE cost split. They claimed "effectively zero overhead" but dodged giving real numbers on the actual overhead.
The "copycat" narrative is dead. Nock didn't copy Pearl's matmul. Nock gave Pearl miners a way to merge-mine while it runs on real ZK-PoUW.
$PRL is adopting $NOCK architecture because their base layer can't do it. What will Pearl holders say now? What's the excuse?
We are cooperating with @prlnet to combine ZK proofs with proof of useful work: announcing a new scheme that is more flexible, more secure, and cheaper to use.
That removes any trust assumptions from pacing and allows verified compliance.
4
8
36
2,020