Fundamentally this is a pro-CCP-victory stance from
@mkratsios47 and the Trump admin. If we take American labs at face value, they have to slow even if they’d otherwise prefer not to because of political backlash risk. Chinese open source is under no such restriction
Interesting comments from OSTP Director Michael Kratsios on the pacing discussions. Echoing some of the prior comments from VP Vance ("if you are building Frankenstein, stop")
"Our position is if you do believe that you are developing a technology that is unsafe, that you don’t want out in the world, you can just stop it.
You don’t need someone to force you to do that and I think thats what’s been a bit confusing about this whole narrative.
So there’s leaders of these companies that are going out and saying we are gonna do all these measures, the government has to do all these things, when in reality they just need to slow down if they feel like they need to do so.”
Companies who are warning that their activities present an immense risk but they plan on continuing anyway should work on a better answer to this question, or should consider whether they in fact can take a greater degree of unilateral action in favor of safety and security than they have thus far.