Does “in crypto since 2017” sound cool or lame?

Sep 10, 2026 · 8:22 PM UTC

14
24
901
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @philtsa
Prefer WIF 2023
1
1
23
what does this stand for?
15
Replying to @philtsa
i’d say that’s already a part of crypto history, definitely sounds legendary
1
1
66
ico rush was something else
1
71
Replying to @philtsa
Idk, just makes one sounds experienced... I guess
1
1
31
I'd rather say we want to prove that we were smart some time ago
16
Replying to @philtsa
if you say this it’s over for you
1
1
140
it’s so over 😢
49
Replying to @philtsa
well if you have made it sounds good, else it sounds like you fumbled the bag btw check your DMs, it's about Trendle smart contracts
1
1
146
if you made it everything sounds better haha
1
12
Replying to @philtsa
100% cool
1
2
36
why are you so sure?
2
37
Replying to @philtsa
depends. if you just invested and did nothing, it’s lame. Not unless you contribute or did something in crypto space
1
1
37
if you invested in bitcoin and did nothing that would be the best actually
34
Replying to @philtsa
iff networth >> 100M return "cool"
1
1
49
iff networth >> 100M it's cool to say anything
1
22
Replying to @philtsa
It’s a cool title fr
1
1
63
unless you sold your btc during 2018 bear run
1
1
38
Replying to @philtsa
How about "bitcoin class 2012''
1
1
49
that is still cool actually
1
137
Replying to @philtsa
Lame for me. Most of the time, it’s the only thing they’ve got to mention.
1
31
I started getting that feeling too
23
Replying to @philtsa
Use to sounds way more cooler, now its just doesn't mean sh*t.
9
Replying to @philtsa
Great question, and the people who answer it with numbers instead of opinions tend to win. You clearly care about the people you serve, and it shows. Would love to send you a special offer with my work and a quote; X opens DMs after a follow back, whenever suits you.
2