But beyond the question of efficacy between the technologies that these two startups offer, how "Indian" each company is, there is a larger question of how companies which have also set up shop in the USA are subjected to American laws and what ramifications it could have on their Indian operations.
Moneycontrol explored this subject in this article, with experts saying that spacetech firms with US operations can be subjected to export controls, compliance mandates, and investor pressure, making them vulnerable to US-directed data blackouts and operational restrictions during conflicts.
However, in his recent blog post on X,
@awaisahmedna has addressed these concerns.
"Indian-designed satellites and their underlying IP do not automatically become subject to US ITAR restrictions merely because Pixxel also has an American entity. Where foreign-origin components or technology carry applicable export-control obligations, we comply with them. Having an international presence does not mean surrendering sovereignty over Indian-developed technology," Ahmed said.
"Space and defence are among the world's most tightly regulated industries. Sensitive Indian government contracts require stringent diligence concerning ownership, management, control, security and technical capabilities. Do people seriously believe the Government of India awards sensitive defence and space contracts without examining these things?," he further asked.