For the long term BTC holders who looks at 3 month charts.

$SPY (October 7, 2026-Weekly Chart) The yearly drawdown is the buying window A yearly drawdown is often the golden buying window, even when most gurus tell you to hold cash or sell. Viewed in hindsight, those periods have frequently been the strongest accumulation zones. How to identify the buy and accumulation signals 1. When the descending blue ribbon appears on $SPY, be excited while others are worried. Stay patient first. 2. Once price stabilizes in a zone and a fresh red candle forms, start buying and accumulating gradually. 3. If a volatility hole also appears, treat it as an even stronger buy and accumulation signal. Then stay with the position. Hold tight and ride the trend set by the whales. You do not need to trade in and out, as the market has consistently rewarded long-term, patient, and disciplined investors. @cantonmeow @sheslee

Skeptical crowd. Public receipts. Two calls that paid. (October 2, 2026) Called $AMD the semiconductor of this cycle in 2025 and shared my accumulation zone from $110 to $220 along the way on X, after the $NVDA call last cycle. Most were skeptical. Also posted the screenshot of how I timed the bottom and accumulated $PLTR aggressively from $110 to $130, while most gurus said it would drop to $60–$80. Check the repost. Plenty of mockery. Result: $AMD +5x from the May 2025 entry. $PLTR +72% in about 2.5 months. I share the research. Not financial advice. @cantonmeow @Jimmy_tesla_01 @Hiteshp99 @sheslee @tonylee80

Yields ripped 11 times this high since 1965 and the following year fell 90 basis points R🦊R #yields #10Year #SPCX #TSLA #PLTR #BITCOIN #CIFR #ETHEREUM #MSTR #NVDA

2 myths that blow up retail portfolios (September 27, 2026) Myth 1 Small stocks look like the easy 10x–20x path to wealth, so retail investors bet too heavy. Then the drawdown comes. Panic. They sell the bottom. Most small names are lottery tickets. Nobody knows which one wins. If your portfolio is heavily-loaded with them, one bad stretch can wipe you out. For lottery tickets, I NEVER keep DCAing. That’s important. Only add if conviction is still there and you are willing to stomach more than 90% volatility. Myth 2 Only sub-$10 stocks can easily do 10x. In Jan 2023 I bought $NVDA at $152 × 10,000 shares (pre-split) and sat. 15x+ in 3 years. $MU $70 → $1,000+ in 1.5 years $AMD $76 → $630 in 1.5 years $SNDK $28 → $1,700+ in 1.5 years None were pennies. Quality can 10x. Size it right. Hold. Cheap is not the requirement.

If $NVDA closes the month above 228? All hell breaks lose.

RT @dannycheng2022: $SPY (September 28, 2026-Weekly Chart) Whales Set the Ribbon while Permabears Sell the Drawdown April 2025 completed…

Not bragging. I’m here to show what actually compounds when you learn to invest in the right stocks for a cycle and size up, instead of trading in and out. $NVDA from $15.2 in Jan 2023 → ~15x $PLTR from $8.8 in May 2023 → ~22x $AMD from $110 in May 2025 → ~5.6x I have posted the screenshots before to silence the haters. I repeat: Real wealth is NEVER made in months, or even a couple of years. It is built across 3–10 year cycles — if you have the patience and conviction to sit still while everyone else needs a new story and keeps chasing new stocks. That is the whole game!

I bought $TQQQ during the Jaime Dimon's "economic hurricane" fear in June 2022. Since then, I met my friend named the Bull Trend, and the Bull Trend has been my friend ever since. I also met @dannycheng2022, but that's another story for another time.

2 weeks ago, @dannycheng2022 and I became bullish on $META (+12% today). Here is a clip of what we shared with his Patreon community. We went through bullish Red Candle, RSI trendline breakout, volume, order block, Fibonacci levels, and Weinstein stages.

BREAKING: Advanced Micro Devices stock, $AMD, officially crosses above $1 trillion in market cap for the first time in history. This puts the stock up +30,400% over the last 10 years. $10,000 invested in AMD in 2016 would be worth $3,050,000 today.

Last month I wrote about how we can build a positive and safe future for everyone: meta.com/thefutureisforevery… Every lab has the responsibility and incentive to move at the pace required to train its models safely, and the ability to take its own actions to ensure that happens. The reality is: - People won't want to use agents that are misaligned with them and that don't do what they ask, so labs have a strong natural incentive to make their models more aligned. There is a lot of debate about slowing progress on capabilities until alignment catches up. My view is that trust and alignment are quickly becoming the most important capabilities that will differentiate agents and models. Any lab that doesn't focus on alignment will fall behind. - Labs face significant liability if their models cause harm, so they have a strong incentive to prevent this as well. Meta delayed shipping Muse for several months to focus on safety and security. We didn't call for everyone else to do this before we would. We just did it as part of our day-to-day work because it was clearly the right thing for people and for us. I'm proud of the security foundations we've built. - Engaging independent evaluators and advisors is industry best practice. MSL already does this today in several areas because it helps produce better work. Other labs can just do this too. In general, it would be helpful for there to be a larger and more diverse ecosystem of evaluators. - Committing the significant majority of compute towards serving people rather than racing towards recursive self-improvement is one of the best ways to ensure we develop this technology safely. Meta has made this commitment and other labs can do this as well. I believe the key to building a positive future for everyone is maintaining the right balance of power. This is within our power to do.

The Fed did a 50 basis point hike in February 1995 and then had to turn around and start cutting rates in July. The FOMC later framed that hike as an "insurance move" against inflation that never really materialized. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. @jameslavish @LawrenceLepard @LynAldenContact

Size, Cycles, and Proof: What 20+ Years in Markets Actually Taught Me (September 15, 2026) After more than two decades in markets—through the 2000 dot-com bust, 2008 financial crisis, 2018 the trade-war scare, 2020 Covid, and the 2022 bear—I have learned that most people lose not because they lack ideas, but because they size the wrong things, follow the wrong voices, and think in the wrong time frame. I have been in this field since I left university. What follows is not theory. It is what I have seen work, and what I have seen destroy people. If you are new or still struggling, please take some time to read: 1. Never let small, speculative stocks dominate your portfolio Small names are usually stories, not businesses. Influencers love pumping them because “10x” sounds exciting. Most never deliver. Even the rare winners often suffer 70–90% drawdowns before any recovery. That volatility is hard to stomach and even harder to recover from if the position is large. I hold a basket of small stocks myself, but they never add up to no more than 2% of the whole portfolio. Not 2% each. Two percent in total. Size them like lottery tickets. Once the hype fades, capital in those names is often trapped for a long time. Evaluate the risk before you speculate. 2. Focus on world-class companies that fit the narratives of each bull cycle. Every bull market has a handful of exceptional businesses that keep making higher highs because the narrative is real. Do your own fundamental work and technical analysis to find them first. Then, follow people who share selflessly and have a proven track record. The best proof is not talk. It is screenshots that show both percentage gains and actual dollar amounts. Percentage alone can be theater. Amounts show whether the person actually sized the idea. If you have genuine long-term conviction in a quality name, always use drawdowns to add and accumulate instead of chasing high or when most are pumping on social media. 3. Sizing is the real skill, the most important one which brings you financial freedom A tiny position in a great company is tourism. A large position in a weak or speculative name steals sleep and distorts every decision. So, at least 50% of the portfolio should sit in high-quality, liquid, cycle-aligned leaders unless you deliberately choose to be an adventurer and accept the volatility. Big volatility can mean big gains—but only if you can actually hold. For myself, my top conviction stocks are $PLTR, $AMD and $NVDA, accounting for more than 90% in my various portfolios in total. 4. Fundamentals matter, but tracking whales matters more Most retail investors care about the fundamental research but unfortunately, the numbers most people see reflect the last quarter. Markets look 3–6 months ahead. Track institutional and whale ownership. Large, careful capital usually loads up before the story is obvious. Follow proven capital, not retail consensus. That is how markets have always worked. 5. Invest across 3- to 10-year cycles, not weeks or months. Wealth is built in cycles, especially in the ugly parts of them. A short time frame is closer to a casino. Frequent trading usually funds excitement, not net worth. The stocks that delivered 100x or more did so over a decade or two. They survived 2000, 2008, 2018, Covid, and 2022. Each time permabears said it was the end. Historically the bear phases have been shorter than the expansions. Dips are inventory events if you have dry powder. 6. Treat crises as the moment to add, not the moment to freeze. The people who come out far ahead are rarely fully invested at the top. They had cash and the willingness to buy when prices were ugly. If you believe in the business for a decade, a deep decline is often the best entry you will get. Learn to welcome those periods—when most people are losing confidence and losing their minds. Great businesses often come out of a crisis bigger and stronger. That is why the focus should stay on world-class companies with real fundamentals. To me, stock selection matters more than any indicator or piece of technical analysis. Rich people do not get rich because they blindly follow private-bank managers or do better technical analysis. They get rich because they pick the right companies and are willing, over the long term, to bet against weak consensus and mediocre fund management. Crisis is not the time to abandon quality. It is the time to own more of it. Markets reward patience, size discipline, and the courage to buy when the story feels finished. They punish haste, oversized speculation, and the need to feel clever every week. If you remember only a few things, remember these: keep the speculative basket at 3% or less in total, put real weight in world-class companies, follow people who can show both percentage and dollar results, and think in cycles of years, not weeks. Crisis is not the end of the game. For those with conviction and dry powder, it is usually the beginning of the next fortune. Stay solvent. Stay selective. Stay long enough. Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. I am sharing my own research and experience only. @Jimmy_tesla_01 @cantonmeow @sheslee @niker8202 @tonylee80 @Hiteshp99

RT @dannycheng2022: MUST-READ: 18 Stocks with New Bullish Signals (September 14, 2026) patreon.com/DannyTrades/post…

WHALES ALREADY PICKED THE WINNER — AMD 7.65x vs NVDA 2.72x FROM THE SAME CYCLE LOW Same cycle low: April 11, 2025 $NVDA $86.40 → $235 on May 15, 2026 = 2.72x $AMD $76.48 → $584.73 on July 2, 2026 = 7.65x Whales have already picked the leader with price action. Did you make the big money?

How to Read My Chart Accurately and Identify Buy and Accumulation Signals — Using $BE as an Example (September 9, 2026) The last volatility hole marked the bottom and served as the first major buy and accumulation zone. Price then entered a choppy consolidation. During that phase, three key momentum bars printed at $205, $217, and $252. These levels first acted as resistance. Once they were cleared with conviction, they flipped into reliable buy signals and new support. Currently, the bullish red ribbon now shows the mid-term uptrend is ready to resume provided that whale accumulation remains strong and steady, currently at 67.5%.

Thank you so much for putting 15 hours into these exclusive videos on 35 trending and core stocks for our community. That kind of work doesn’t go unnoticed, and I’m really grateful. I’m posting them one by one now for our community. @cantonmeow @sheslee @tonylee80 @RosannaInvests @HeidingOut @Hiteshp99

$IBIT (September 5, 2026-Weekly Chart) There are 3 volatility holes on the weekly chart from November 2024 to September 2026.The first two, together with the bullish red ribbon, marked the top and the last cycle high! The last one, together with the blue ribbon (downtrend), marked the early bottoming process this cycle. Price then entered a choppy consolidation. A break of the $39.46 momentum bar has launched the current rally. The key level now is the longest momentum bar at $48.042. A clear break above it would open the door to more upside, with the next momentum bar at $58.90. @cantonmeow @GreatMattsby @sheslee @Hiteshp99 @tonylee80

The Most Expensive Monthly Subscription That Never Lets You Own Winners Big (September 4, 2026) You pay $100, $200, sometimes $2,000 a month for “premium” stock calls and market wisdom. What you usually get is recycled charts, recycled fear, wave counts telling you exactly how high or low prices can go—levels that almost never actually hit—and a rotating list of small stocks with “10x potential.” Almost none of it is durable thinking about how real wealth is actually built across a full cycle. The portfolios that follow those services almost never own or sit concentrated in the names that keep compounding — $PLTR, $HOOD, $NVDA. They spread across 40 or 50 positions “for safety.” That is not diversification. It is dilution. The market does not reward equal weighting of mediocrity. It rewards owning the businesses that are pulling the future forward and letting them become a larger and larger share of the account. Then come the Elliott Wave accounts. For months they have drawn the same pictures: $PLTR collapsing to $40–$60, $HOOD to $30–$50, $NVDA back to $80. Those targets have been published, screenshot, and sold as certainty. Meanwhile $PLTR trades near $182, $HOOD near $125, $NVDA near $228. The waves keep getting redrawn. The subscriptions keep getting charged. The other trap is the small-cap lottery. Some big accounts post so many small or meme stocks selling a story about 10x or 100x and a chart that looks explosive if you squint. Position sizes get oversized because the dream is large. Unfortunately, very few become the next $PLTR. They become footnotes. The people selling the dream rarely disclose how many prior “100-baggers” they already got wrong. X is full of both types: the high-priced newsletter that never names the actual long-term compounders, and the big scammer accounts that always have the next 10-bagger. The genuine voices are quieter and rare. They talk about business quality, cash-flow durability, and why a handful of names can reasonably sit at the core of a portfolio for years. They do not need to scare you into selling the winners or chase you into the next micro-cap. Know who you follow. Look at their history with proven track record, not their latest thread. See whether they kept owning the stocks that actually worked or whether they spent years calling for the crash that never arrived. The difference is not style. It is whether they understand that the biggest gains come from staying concentrated in the few companies that keep proving they can grow for a very long time.

BREAKING: Short interest in the median S&P 500 stock is up to 3.2% of market cap, the highest level since 2009. This is now approaching the 2008 Financial Crisis peak of ~3.8%. By comparison, during the 2022 bear market, this percentage was ~1.7%. Furthermore, short interest among the most heavily shorted 10% of S&P 500 stocks is up to 8.0% of market cap, the highest in 8 years. Even during the 2000 Dot-Com Bubble burst, short interest never surged to these levels. The short trade is starting to look overcrowded.