CS theory warlord (both ways).

~Seattle
🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵 🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵 🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵 🧵🧵thread of threads🧵🧵 🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵 🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵 🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵
5
5
107
35,306
gonna have to see how these ones were done o__O
4
1
24
1,012
hmm
I had Opus 5.5 update a classic meme
1
1
101
parallel work or just an extremely fast response?
We're publishing a result demonstrating a substantial tightening to the results from OpenAI Problem #109 (integer multiplication). Conditional on OpenAI's algorithmic interfaces, our parameter and network refinements improve the exponent saving in: T(n)=O(n(\log n)^{1-\kappa}) from κ=2⁻¹⁸² to κ=5.8×10⁻³³ (between 2⁻¹⁰⁸ and 2⁻¹⁰⁷). This represents a nearly 2⁷⁵ fold increase in the algorithm's exponent saving parameter. We also establish a ceiling of κ<5.838×10⁻³³ for the stated network-counting family and cost inequalities. Our result exceeds 99% of that ceiling. Surpassing this ceiling would require improving the network bounds or cost analysis from the original result.
1
33
isn't this the first solo physics Nobel in ages?
BREAKING NEWS The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the 2026 #NobelPrize in Physics to Francis Halzen “for decisive contributions to the IceCube Neutrino Observatory and the discovery of high-energy neutrinos of astrophysical origin.”
2
35
1,897
> junk DNA deniers did I miss some controversy?
junk DNA deniers unironically believe this guy needs every single of its 90 billion base pairs to do what it does but humans are fine with 3
5
11
627
as in people in the replies seem to be treating that as ~not just a joke
1
79
what do people actually use these for? I could already previously send a chatbot message that pings me when the answer's ready. this feels like it's for long running tasks that I don't want to pay attention to?
what's the verdict on muse vs grokbot vs dots vs instinct? should i start using one of these, and if so, which one?
5
10
579
Me: "I don't get why people like Grokbot-style bots, what the hell's the point" Also me: "Ok, I have a new thing to work on, let me create a fresh profile, with it's own tight set of skills and tools, and custom instructions tuned for a particular model & just use 1 single session forever so over time it just has all the context it needs" Also also me: "Ohhhhhh....." Fine, I grudgingly get it
1
22
is this a manufacturing or a regulation or a FSD reliability thing?
Tesla is making solid progress with Robotaxi but I've gotta say the last 18 months have been a total vindication for the "Tesla isn't doing anything special and will have to do the same city-by-city slog as Waymo" thesis.
2
6
1,183
I wonder when we'll get automated dental cleaning feels like it'd be as hard as automating minor surgery
5
1
16
808
for example, these 1s that aren't custom printed are ~completely useless for actually cleaning between teeth. idk how much better I can expected custom printed trays to be
If i had a private equity shop i’d buy these guys. Whole mouth Waterfloss in 6 seconds with a custom 3d printed mouthpiece. It’s fantastic, but they do not advertise properly.
1
92
apparently, chatgpt temporary chats now don't get deleted and instead merely don't appear in your chat history. the links still work days later (with them newly having unique ids/urls like regular chats), and you even can't delete them like you can non-temporary chats wtf
3
16
651
now, going to that link gives a "You don’t have access to this conversation. Make sure you’re logged in to the right account, or ask the conversation owner to send you a share link." message better, but still makes me think they weren't deleted
1
34
are they talking about Gemini here or some version of Claude?
3
395
what would make chat better? both gcs and 1-on-1 DMs
irc sucked in 1998 and chat sucks now fuck chatting
2
8
741
does Uber actually increase the price if they think you specifically over other customers can pay more? I don't mean surge pricing, but things like modeling how frequently you take expensive trips and other proxies for being rich
6
8
835
?
Uber tonight: * $79 - to my house * $26 to my neighbors house We love to see it
1
2
91
> mcdonalds rolling out new SUPER INTELLIGENCE > archy > INTELLIGENTLY changes pricing > store 1: $5.69 for burger > drive down rode > two miles away > store 2: $6.89 for burger > archy trained on 14,000 restaurants > archy learned who willing to pay more
38
feel's like this's cuz it's very easy to get blocked from ~a single bad interaction, even if you're acting in good faith
wow im learning that my conflict-avoidant ass gets really stressed out by pissing a lot of people off. i wonder why i don't do this more often
2
14
660
i commit to never blocking anyone for anything they post publicly might mute you for a bit tho, but you can always DM
1
5
89
blocks and mutes feel very different for me. I ~never do the former but am very trigger happy with the latter
I kind of loathe how common blocking is on this site tbh it can't be healthy to have, as a standard and commonly used part of online interaction, "cut someone off forever without explanation and never engage with them in any way"
1
35
my take's that the natural niche they'll find is illegal activity anything else immediately gets followed by someone with better access to capital + the same tier of model
Replying to @dcposch
Why hasn't it happened yet? To achieve r>1 liftoff, it's not enough to be smart. The first replicants need originality and insight. They need a market niche that: ...agents can serve ...but is not yet commoditized; they need paying customers, so they can't do something people know how to ask ChatGPT to do for free ...and which is not a venture-scale opportunity, otherwise human-led cos will do it and (for now) beat the solo machine ...and on top of all that, you need the agent to find *new* such niches In other words, the agent itself needs some esoteric knowledge. It needs a good answer to the Thiel question, "what do you believe that few others believe"? Nobody has achieved this yet. Close attempts include Felix and @0xSigil's Automaton, both from Jan/Feb 2026, and iLands. In any case, the models are much smarter now...
1
10
706
this's a much better equilibrium imo. for software, defense wins at the limit
Replying to @1thousandfaces_
serious redteaming is required on ALL software that exists. Better to be public and availble for that, than hope some covert group just does it quietly and starts using it to exploit everything
1
5
430
no one formally verifies the security or correctness of their software implementations; it's all security through obscurity attempting to red team your software by pointing your current models at it doesn't work: the next models will find new holes
1
70
Social stability -- cybersecurity, law, government -- has historically depended on slack. Think of slack as the gap between what's possible in principle and what actually gets done. Sources of slack include: 1) Effort: some things are too tedious or costly for anyone to bother with. Security through obscurity is the classic example. 2) Institutional capacity: the organizations responsible for doing them are too slow or dysfunctional to follow through. 3) Headcount: not enough people to do them at scale. Much of AI's disruption to the social order, including cyberrisk/biorisk but also including trivial things like restaurant reservations, can be modeled as the disappearance of slack.
18