Not surprised that everyone is finding the Claude-Obsidian setup mind blowing. I've been using this set up for the last few months and it's totally changed my daily habits and how I think about using AI. Some tips: 1. You HAVE TO build a daily commonplace practice. The more observations, epiphanies, thoughts, and questions you can jot down, the more context your agents will have on how you think, make decisions, what matters to you, etc. These notes don't need to be clean or structured. Optimize for whatever lets you just get the thing down on paper. You're doing it right if your notes are all over the place...that's how our brain works. My rec is to voice transcribe as much as you can because it's easier to say more. Say your ifs, buts, and ums. They're actually more helpful in context. You're letting your agent know what you are and aren't sure about. The key thing to note about @karpathy's LLM wiki base is that it's fantastic for research projects - where it makes sense to have synthetically produced artifacts. But if you're trying to use "Claude + Obsidian" as a personal thinking tool, then you can't outsource your own life experiences to AI. That personal context you add is quite literally what makes the tool useful for you. After doing this for 9 months, I can say for sure the context compounds. If you can just keep the habit going for a few weeks, you'll start noticing patterns that surprise you. 2. Go learn about @andy_matuschak's atomic note taking practice. My big takeaway here is that thinking in atomic notes makes it easier to pull contexts from different parts of your life that you would normally modularize. The notes aren't facts/names/dates but rather concepts. I love to think about them like API endpoints you call when trying to solve through problems in your professional or personal life. Remember, as @paulg says "writing is thinking". Just write these notes for yourself in a way that makes sense to YOU. You'll start changing how you perceive your own thoughts and thinking style. Eventually, you'll get to a point where you have so many atomic notes that you dictate a train of thought to Claude and it'll go through your vault and pull your own thoughts from the past to help you out...it's a magical experience. 3. Connect @readwise or Obsidian Web Clipper to build an intentional reading habit. Since starting this setup, I've realized how much of my content consumption in the past was cope. I thought I was being productive by listening to podcasts all the time or scrolling on Substack instead of X. I now am *extremely intentional* about the content I read and how I read it. @phokarlsson has a post on this called "Structure your milieu". Ask yourself, who gets access to my brain? Read their writing religiously and block everyone else out. Your time scrolling should equate to searching for potential reads you want to add to the backlog, that's it. And your "consumption time" should be you in Reader highlighting and taking notes obsessively. Even a simple 5 min Substack read should be treated as an opportunity to create new atomic notes, connect previous ideas, etc. The Readwise Obsidian plugin then lets you pull all your highlights that you can then connect to other parts of your vaults in meaningful ways. Remember, the more you read with intention, the more context you'll have to add to your "second brain". You can't automate that part. I haven't used @kepano's Obsidian Web clipper yet but going to try this week. His recent Youtube demo looked amazing. 4. Build an agentic constitution (.md) This is effectively the portal between your Obsidian and Claude. I have a detailed post on how I did this + a template you can feed to your own AI of choice to build for yourself (see in reply below). But this file is you letting your agent know all the context it needs to know about you at a high level: who you are, your big question, how you like to work, your main goals, current problems, context on your team, and so on. Anytime I have the agents do work for me, the first step is to go read the constitution so it acts in alignment with what I'm looking for at this stage in my life. Key note here is that it's a constant WIP doc. I'm almost updating this weekly so that Claude knows what's changing in terms of focus and prioritization. The more you think about this doc like you're updating your team, the more useful it will be. 5. Create Knowledge Work PRs This is the coolest part in terms of Claude integration but it only works if you have meaningfully spent time on the steps above. I've slowly been adding subroutines to my vault. Call them skills or agents it doesn't matter. To me, they're equivalent of writing methods in a code repo. Each subroutine has a specific set of instructions on what to do. And they all start by reading the agentic constitution. For example, one of mine is called "Tend the Vault". Its job is to check all my daily commonplace entries since I last triggered it, notice any key threads and insights, tell me which atomic notes I need to update, and create a draft of what to add. Then I'll go through a 5 minute voice session where it takes me through edits one by one and I'll approve, tweak, or reject them. Once we go through the changes, it will go and updates all the respective md files. I call this section "Knowledge Work PRs" because that's exactly what they are. You run your subroutines, the agents go do the work, and then you sit down and just like a manager go through all the PRs and decide what gets to go through production. Ok this is getting pretty long so I'll stop here but if you made this far, I HIGHLY RECOMMEND you go through my Substack Engineering Agency. I've detailed every single one of my steps on how I build a better thinking, commonplacing, reading, writing, and second brain practice. See the replies below for links.

Apr 13, 2026 · 2:55 PM UTC

37
74
1,083
66,022
How you can build a more effective commonplace practice and use knowledge work PRs to keep your Obsidian high quality
If you're looking to write and publish more, stop waiting on inspiration. You don't lack ideas, you're just not converting them. Here's how you can set up a simple system to blog effortlessly. On filtering your inputs, capturing fleeting thoughts, & using agents for momentum:
1
7
2,838
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @yb_effect
Back in the algo lfg
1
1
179
🫡
162
Replying to @yb_effect
Very cool post! You make some important and non-obvious points here. > LM wiki base is that it's fantastic for research projects - where it makes sense to have synthetically produced artifacts. But if you're trying to use "Claude + Obsidian" as a personal thinking tool, then you can't outsource your own life experiences to AI. It's easy to get caught up in the excitement of AI-generated wikis, but if that content is siloed, then it is akin to a deep research report with nicer ergonomics. As you mention lower down, a more ideal setup is one where you carefully collaborate with AI to gently move your densely-linked, conceptual notes forward. > For example, one of mine is called "Tend the Vault". Its job is to check all my daily commonplace entries since I last triggered it, notice any key threads and insights, tell me which atomic notes I need to update, and create a draft of what to add. I've been struggling to find exactly the right size of AI-generated content that I can reasonably argue I can fully assimilate. Tweet-size seems good? I tend to label stuff AI says with "AI says:" just so I don't delude myself into thinking _I_ had that keen insight when I revisit it a few months later ;) I've been using the densely-linked conceptual notes pattern for several years, predating the ability to collaborate with AI, and have arrived at a pattern very similar to @kepano and a few others I've seen here on X. * I started with multiple vaults with lots of folders * then I moved to a single vault with folders for different areas of interest * then a single vault with minimal folders and lots of tags * and finally to a structure that I've remained happy with for several years... a single vault, minimal folders, conceptual notes and everything densely linked (seems to be the pattern that the most experienced folks have arrived at as well, which is nice validation!) The challenge I've encountered is in publishing. I like to make little sites from portions of my notes to share with others. I've been doing that for years. It's not too challenging when those notes are like the LLM wiki research projects... siloed. But when your notes are densely interconnected, it can be very challenging to find a seam... and after you publish, the underlying source graph changes all the time, so if you plan to ever update your site, you need exceptionally good change management (very git-like). So I took a first-principles approach to solving that problem and ended up with meadow-notes.com/ which I'm really excited about. Anyhow, I love the way you're thinking about this stuff. Thanks for the post!
1
8
954
Amazing reply and I agree with the setup, single vault with minimal folders works the best. Huge fan of @kepano flat structure method, lets me feel liberal about linking notes that I normally wouldn't. With my tend the vault subroutine, I make sure that if Claude is making any edits to the files it says "Done by Claude" and also backlinks to the PR (which has the date) so I know exactly what set of daily notes triggered it and when. Tweet size feels about right to me as well. In terms of publishing, I actually just tweeted this thread today and thought you mind find it helpful x.com/yb_effect/status/20437…
If you're looking to write and publish more, stop waiting on inspiration. You don't lack ideas, you're just not converting them. Here's how you can set up a simple system to blog effortlessly. On filtering your inputs, capturing fleeting thoughts, & using agents for momentum:
1
507
Replying to @yb_effect
I love this setup! But always felt Claude + Obsidian to be limited in terms of finding the right resource. So I built a simple tool that fixes the problems. Completely open source and improvements over Obsidian's search and organization. Try it out :)
1
6
929
> Now, if you ask Claude for "a productivity tip", Claude searches for "productivity tip" > finds nothing (since the word "Productivity" doesn't exist in the original document) > responds with a generic answer. I don't run into this issue! If you prompt it to focus on ideas rather than semantic search, it actually does a pretty good job at least from what I've seen
1
370
Replying to @yb_effect
so if the constitution is basically your personal api spec, does it break when you pivot goals or do you just version control it like code?
1
1
115
it's a live doc, probably worth updating every 1-2 weeks just like you would after a sprint
93
Replying to @yb_effect
how long does it take for it generate more value than you're putting in? I use obsidian irregularly and that's what put me off of non-AI PKM / zettelkasten / note-taking. I felt I never got to that positive value point.
1
1
320
There's phases of delight with it. You'll probably notice initially a month in but once you're 2-3 months in the practice and have been truly committing to getting words down, you should be seeing tangible results
2
238
Replying to @yb_effect
I’ve Obsidian + codex for months as a journal and reflection tool. Every week I have codex review my week based on a template & skill. Suggest behavior change. Repeat every month and look for patterns week over week. Repeat to find patterns, progress, wins over many months.
1
1
235
love this setup! feels like an all in one tool and can connect Obsidian to whatever I want
146
Replying to @yb_effect
need that constitution template bro, sounds like the missing piece in my setup
1
1
35
check this post out! hopefully it's helpful engineeringagency.substack.c…
29
Replying to @yb_effect
What I’ve set up also is the daily snapshots, or regarding life cases or work projects, so to say prs but classified)
1
1
313
yep that's what I mean by the daily notes! private and just for you to keep jotting down thoughts and building context
260
Replying to @yb_effect
Have you thought about getting a Plaid pin to wear and using it for voice memos? It'll automatically transcribe for you
2
1
146
not ready for a pin just yet, not sure if that's the form factor I think will suit me best. right now, just using airpods is good enough tbh
113
Replying to @yb_effect
commonplace saved me
12
Replying to @yb_effect
@grok explain more about atomic notes
3
2
413
Replying to @yb_effect
so basically we're all building mini dev environments for our brains
1
18
Replying to @yb_effect
Wait until you discover Open Brain and vector databases.
1
215
Replying to @yb_effect
the "daily commonplace practice" point is the real unlock. the technical setup is 30 minutes. the discipline to feed it consistently is the actual moat. most people set up the wiki and then stop adding to it after a week. the compounding only works if you treat it like a commitment, not a configuration.
1
34
Replying to @yb_effect
The "Knowledge Work PRs" framing is exactly right. The missing piece is the graph layer underneath — without entity resolution your atomic notes stay siloed. That's what Flywheel solves: auto-links the vault so the agent has traversable context, not just a pile of markdown.
85
Replying to @yb_effect
좋른글 감사
1
Replying to @yb_effect
Im reading a ton of things mostly on X but also just online articles about different topics. I also have some personal or business issues where I sometimes write Claude everything that comes to mind about the situation and have it do an analysis for me. I’d like to have some system where I just throw in links to X posts or other articles plus add some chats where I do my stream of consciousness dumps and have an AI somehow make sense of it and connect it when appropriate. Which setup would you recommend?
76
Replying to @yb_effect
@danmall might interest you!
109
Replying to @yb_effect
real ones already tend the vault
29
Replying to @yb_effect
👀
Running is everything. Only ~1 in 20 investors is active right now(into startups). Not just active active right now, in your stage, in your market. Waiting doesn’t fix that. But real-time signals + speed does. Most founders don’t fail because of the idea. They fail because they reach out to the wrong investors at the wrong time. The edge is simple: Knowing who just raised a fund Knowing who is actively deploying Knowing where capital is moving That’s timing: @SheetVenture Run fast. But run when it matters.
11
Replying to @yb_effect
Shhh 🤫 damn man
55