Policymakers in MA really can't imagine second-order effects with housing. If costly energy requirements lead to more sprawl, that's bad! If IZ leads to fewer total units, that's a net negative! You can't just legislate 'good thing has to happen' and expect it to work
One of my biggest concerns with housing policy in Boston and Massachusetts is that regulation only seems to move in one direction. We keep adding energy, affordability, design and other requirements, but rarely revisit or remove them as market conditions change.
Meanwhile, Massachusetts issued just 14,000 housing permits in 2024, one of our lowest totals in 70 years, while housing costs have soared to among the highest in America.
At some point, we need to stop asking what else we can require of new housing and start asking what requirements we can remove or lessen before it's too late.