No, I am not mad at NatCon. And yes, I do agree vehemently with the bottom line: israeli self-reliance. As some would say: “I violently agree.”
And I’ve been arguing that for 30 years.
And that Israel understands that and is developing a strategic concept of far greater self-reliance tells me Israel will be just fine.
Also, I agree that we have a very grave problem in our youth here about which we can ignore and be ostriches, but at our own peril, to say the least.
All more true, in fact, than the speakers themselves emphasized, in fact.
But there were certain assumptions:
1. that the US has acted in the region under an Israel-first policy, and that Israel just wants the U.S. to do the heavy lifting for it, which is rank gibberish and frankly bizarre given the immense human cost young Israelis have paid in holding the front lines of civilization and freedom against barbarism and tyrannical insanity over the last three years;
2. that the antisemitism should and could safely be ignored, or at least diminished in our priorities and ought not be the main issue Jews and Israel should concern itself with, and certainly should not guide our views of certain actors, and finally, the kicker …
3. … We should accept and adjust to entitlement and closed-mindedness of our youth rather than fight it hard.
The problem is that all these assumptions are wrong and dangerous, not only regarding Israel, but in terms of American and civilizational survival.
But the speakers gave no indication of a plan to fight these views, and to various degrees sought to excuse them and basically suggested some of these assumptions were correct.
All were left on the table unexamined; that was disappointing.
And perhaps because they seem content to adjust to, indulge or accept the crisis of American youth’s lack of commitment to civilizational survival, they were oblivious to the reality to which they were just exposed.
They were visiting in a nation whose youth are displaying exactly those qualities which are dying in our youth. Those young Israelis are providing a glaring counterpoint to the deterioration that can end our greatness if not even terminate our civilizational survival.
Israeli youth are displaying in droves right now the Greek quality of thumos — valor and civilizational vitality — to which Secretary Rubio appealed last week and is dangerously absent in other western countries.
And yet, the speakers simply seemed unable to rise above an obliviousness to the examinable model of thumos glaring at them outside the conference hall.
Which then raises a very serious question as to how much of a solution their brand of political thinking, with which I mostly agree, actually is to the obvious problem we have.