✡︎ • International Law • Public Policy • Ph.D. Student • Often Sarcastic

United States
We have filed, on behalf of our Palestinian client, a demand for warrants for the leadership of Hamas at the @IntlCrimCourt for the crimes committed by the terrorist government of Gaza against the Palestinian people. @KarimKhanQC and the Office of the Prosecutor cannot say that they truly care about justice if they continue to ignore the blatant crimes committed against the Palestinian people by Hamas. These crimes include numerous crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by Hamas against the Palestinian people. Notably including the war crime of utilizing the presence of civilians or other protected persons as human shields. There has never been a demonstration that the Palestinian's are willing and able to investigate Hamas for these crimes. Hamas' purposeful conduct in Gaza has greatly exacerbated the harm against Palestinian civilians. The unnecessary suffering of the Palestinian people must be accounted for and the ICC cannot claim to care about justice if it remains silent on these crimes. Thankful to the work of my colleagues, Eli Rosenbaum, and @sarah_scialom, and our brave client who came forward to tell their story.
Exclusive: A Gazan man's lawyers made a submission to the International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor demanding that 14 Hamas leaders be investigated for crimes committed against the Palestinian people, marking the first such filing by a Palestinian against Hamas. ✍️ @MathildaHeller jpost.com/middle-east/articl…
67
322
1,064
147,490
𝔼𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟 retweeted
This is an incredibly important question, because the sudden spike of antisemitism in the wake of 10/7 impacts everyone who cares to maintain & defend Western civilization - whether we recognize it or not. That's because @Israel has been characterized by #Hamas + its backers as a "racist, aggressive, colonial project" for years (pic 1, excerpt of Hamas charter from May 2017). It doesn't matter that 🇮🇱 - sorry, the "Zionist project" - doesn't actually warrant any of those labels. It's a messaging campaign, pure & simple. And the target audience for this PR agenda has long been progressives throughout the West. You know, all those crunchy, tree-hugging fascists who are hell-bent on tearing down the "racist, aggressive, colonial project" known as Western civilization & replacing it with their pick of "decolonial" socialist, communist, Marxist, populist sociopolitical structure. As we all know very well, hatred directed toward Jews is by no means a new phenomenon. What IS new, at least in modern times, is how mainstream & socially acceptable antisemitism has become since 10/7. And it has done so as a direct response to the terrorist propaganda campaign that has, for decades by now, gradually cultivated a sense of solidarity among populist progressives in the West & the Palestinian "liberation" movement in the Middle East. The "Palestinian 'liberation' movement" is simply another way of describing Hamas - and yet populist progressives pledge allegiance to THIS cause because it is seen as doing over there - by any means necessary - what they wish they could do in their wildest dreams over here (see pic 2, for one example of this elation from immediately after 10/7). In this way, Israel has emerged as a proxy of sorts for Western civilization. After all, it IS the only Western style democracy in the MENA region - and it has traditionally been the closest partner & ally of Western style democracies in MENA. Until, that is, mere days after the (actual) atrocities perpetrated by Hamas on 10/7. For anyone who may not be particularly familiar with why those atrocities were perpetrated when they were, this brief recap is important to keep in mind for present purposes. At the time, a number of Gulf Arab states were on the steady path toward normalizing ties with 🇮🇱. And normalization would have pushed Hamas, other regional proxies backed by 🇮🇷, and #IRGC itself to the margins of relevance in the region. 🇮🇱 was deeply divided at the time (a level of division that is gradually returning). @JoeBiden had proven himself to be incompetent & ditheringly impotent on the foreign policy front after the catastrophic sudden withdrawal from 🇦🇫 and then the full invasion of 🇺🇦 by 🇷🇺. So the time was deemed right to carry out the plan that had been in the making for several years by committing unspeakable atrocities, thereby giving 🇮🇱 no realistic choice but to respond with overwhelming military force to end the enduring security threat posed by Hamas. If 🇮🇱 succeeded, no more Hamas. If 🇮🇱 failed, normalization would be derailed due to the large-scale armed conflict directed against Arab Muslim groups on several fronts - and Hamas would survive to maintain some governing role in #Gaza even after the conflict. And the terrorist-progressive "solidarity" movement has always been Hamas's best shot at "succeeding" - that is, getting away with 10/7, surviving the ensuing large-scale conflict they knew would ensue, and maintaining some degree of control afterward. To make that happen, they need somebody BESIDES THEMSELVES calling for a ceasefire & an arms embargo against 🇮🇱. Cue the populists progressives throughout the West who dream of tearing down the "racist, aggressive, colonial project" they believe their OWN sociopolitical structures represent. "No one is free until Palestine is free." That's what they mean. Solidarity with Palestinian "liberation" (that is, terrorism) is seen as advancing their OWN cause at home because 🇮🇱 is a proxy for Western civilization abroad. So, Israel is regarded as a proxy for the West. Jews are regarded as a proxy for Israel. And those who want to replace Western civilization with some form of socialist populism now consider hate directed against Jews to be acceptable because Jews are regarded as a proxy for Western civilization. One critical component of this sudden escalation in OPEN antisemitism I haven't directly mentioned yet is the dynamic that brought me personally to this discussion: the language of international law. This is a hitch pin of sorts because international law rhetoric is essential for convincing governments to push for a ceasefire as early as possible AND to implement an arms embargo against 🇮🇱. I intentionally refrained from mentioning international law until near the end of these observations because this is the vulnerability that makes the whole thing possible. Not nearly enough people, understandably, are knowledgeable enough to counter - with precision - the rampant #legaldisinformation that drives the anti-Israel, and anti-Jewish, narratives & sentiment that is being used to justify the sudden explosion of antisemitism throughout the West. That is an area that needs improvement on an industrial scale. Detailed knowledge of international law is essential in order to hold governments to account when they RELY on the language of international law to justify anti-Israel policies while appeasing their rabidly anti-Western progressive + Islamist base. Only when these governments are adequately held to account - where it counts at the ballotbox - can they be voted out of office along with their foreign policy initiatives & domestic anti-Israel rhetoric that only FUELS the rampant rise of antisemitism they make sure to denounce in public messaging when it predictably manifests in an attack on Jews or Jewish interests. Make no mistake. We are at war. For those who care about preserving Western civilization, it is not a war of our choosing. Even so, it is not a forgone conclusion that we will prevail in the end. The anti-Western sentiment that also drives the sudden rise of antisemitism since 10/7 is pervasive in many important social institutions such as the media (pic 3 as but one recent example) and even in our governing structures (pic 4 as but one recent example). But if you care about preserving Western civilization, you need to ALSO care that antisemitism is off the scale. Because for some people, antisemitism is just about hating Jews for being Jewish. That brand of antisemitism has been around for thousands of years. Even so, that's not solely responsible for the sudden rise in antisemitism since 10/7. THAT is driven by anti-Western sentiment with Jews regarded as a proxy for the West. Standing up for those who are wrongfully accused of committing crimes (here, pursuant to international law) as well as those who are deemed RESPONSIBLE for the supposed crimes even though they were not directly involved in the first place is noble & virtuous in its own right. But anyone who takes a stand against anti-Western sentiment manifest as antisemitism by proxy is ALSO actively standing up for those who are wrongfully accused. I am not a Jew. But I absolutely DO care that antisemitism is off the scale. Not ONLY because I care about a community experiencing record levels of hate that is being fomented by disinformation related to my primary area of professional expertise. But ALSO because I care about preserving Western civilization. And if YOU care about the same, then you damn sure better care that antisemitism is off the scale since 10/7. Like it or not, recognize it or not, the two are inextricably linked. #TheMoreYouKnow
Does anyone, apart from Jews, actually care that antisemitism is off the scale?
8
18
59
2,145
𝔼𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟 retweeted
I am happy to join 6,000 prominent scholars, legal experts to sign a letter rejecting Gaza genocide charge. jpost.com/israel-news/articl… include historian Niall Ferguson, Israeli historian Benny Morris, Holocaust historian and former US Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism Deborah Lipstadt, Tel Aviv University professor emerita and former Yad Vashem chief historian Dina Porat, historian and author Simon Sebag Montefiore, UCLA professor Judea Pearl, and Brandeis University professor emeritus Jonathan Sarna.
241
1,042
4,401
302,797
He helps our enemies and I hope he repented for that on Yom Kippur (he didn’t, he went and helped those who want to kill us). @bradlander is a putz.
TRADITION! @bradlander who is now the Democratic nominee for Congress and I have an annual tradition to purchase an Lulav and Esrog on Erev Sukkos. This year was no different! Brad wishes the community a Chag Sameach!
1
2
17
1,125
𝔼𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟 retweeted
Steven Pinker, Deborah Lipstadt, Benny Morris and Irwin Cotler are among more than 6,000 signatories to an open letter rejecting the accusation that Israel committed genocide in Gaza. The letter argues that the allegation misrepresents Israel’s conduct and has been used to justify attacks on Jews worldwide. Its authors include Yossi Klein Halevi, Rabbi Yitz Greenberg, Rabbi Micha Odenheimer and historian Jonathan Karp. Sam Halpern reports on the letter and its signatories for The Jerusalem Post: jpost.com/israel-news/articl…
8
87
277
6,586
Maybe we’d have a better chance of winning those wars if Members of Congress like @RoKhanna didn’t introduce War Powers Resolutions every other day hampering our ability to negotiate because our enemies see Congress limiting the presidents ability to negotiate from strength. This isn’t actually difficult to understand and A LOT of Democrats in Congress have privately told me that they know that each of these WPR’s strengthen’s our enemies negotiating positions and weakens ours. That’s a monumentally moronic place to put ourselves in if we want to end this diplomatically.
"Why are we wasting money on wars we are not winning?" @RepRoKhanna
1
2
29
867
Most based thing @AHousefather has ever done.
“You are literally one of the biggest antisemites in Canada” & “one of the worst antisemites in the country” was Liberal MP Anthony Hausfather’s response to my question outside Parliament
2
4
60
2,580
This is likely defamatory at this point because @History__Speaks is saying something they know is not factually accurate as if it is. Which is when actual malice comes into play. Relevant analysis in the thread.
I'm drafting an email to the @washingtonpost regarding charlatan John Spencer (@SpencerGuard), whose undisclosed use of AI to write entire articles blatantly violates the Post's policy. They should retract that charlatan's articles.
5
10
85
2,733
See here:
So I noticed a few days ago that someone (@andymilburn8) was using this post as a means of attacking @SpencerGuard's body of work so I started digging only to find that Andy's own work was aided by LLMs. I also noticed @piersmorgan sharing the post to attack Spencer and found that interesting and think that if this portrayal is nefarious in nature and is now being picked up by media or any big names to attack any of these individuals, there could be legal liability if the data suggests that the analysis is incomplete or nefarious in nature. What I decided to do was to do further research and figure out what this thread demonstrates, or attempts to demonstrate, and see if this is real across the body of work over the last few years of Spencer's. But I also wanted to test another writer that @History__Speaks (Matthew Cockerill) has spoken highly of and done work with (I believe, correct me if I'm wrong), @Michael_Spagat, as well as one of @mehdirhasan's pieces. Since Cockerill also went after @Mr_Andrew_Fox I decided to test a few of Fox's articles as well. I tested a total of six (6) of his articles. ***DISCLAIMER: Fox is a colleague who I have done and am currently doing work with.*** To start, I want to say that this is not me saying that all of these people use AI to further their work. My hypothesis here is two-fold: (1) There's an imperfect analysis going on because there's the possibility that AI helped *edit* the pieces and the work itself is from the writers (research, etc.); and (2) That Cockerill selectively applied his post to only the articles that he could find AI interface, and he likely found articles where there was none and did not include them. I believe what has happened is a bad faith attempt to discredit people's body of work in totality through selective application of AI detection through Pangram. Now, I will also state that this is not a complete analysis, the point is to see if there is a bias that can be demonstrated here, as hypothesis #2 predicts. I will also say that I have randomly chosen articles to try to avoid selection bias and that this cannot be indicative of the totality of the work for any of the others. Because some may demonstrate the use of LLMs does not mean that LLMs are responsible for the totality of work, nor does it mean for any of these authors that the use of the LLMs was done in an unethical fashion. That is not something I test for. I just want to see what is going on with what Cockerill is doing with his posts. Further, when you use Pangram it also gives you a measure of confidence if you know where to look on the application of an LLM. None of the ones that I have found were 100% confident in their measurements. What I believe is happening here is that the authors are using the LLM to edit their papers. One can raise the ethical question about this, I personally don't have a problem with it. I paid an editor a lot of money to suggest edits to my book, an LLM is extremely inexpensive compared to that – especially when you are churning out a lot of work. Conclusions*: *The data and analysis follows this section. (1) It is not possible to definitively state to 100% certainty that any of the authors are using the LLMs to write the totality of their work. It is likely that they are using these tools to edit and are accepting those edits. There's a relatively high confidence on this because we see the AI provided work pop up in the middle of some of these pieces and not for the full pieces themselves. (2) Cockerill is likely selectively applying the information that he has collected and is not portraying the totality of the work because the totality of the work would demonstrate something other than these authors using AI to write and produce their work. In fact, we can see that through the confidence meter that Pangram itself is not 100% positive of the use of LLMs. The selectivity bias that Cockerill is using for his posts to attack people could be defamatory in nature because he likely knows that what he's portraying is not accurate to the totality of the work but is making it appear as so to discredit their credentials and academic opportunities and is doing so with knowledge and purpose. Dataset: Here's some of what I found of Spencer's articles: "Can Military Morale Survive Smartphones?" (published in the Wall Street Journal this month [Sept. 2026]): 100% human written "Battle of Sadr City" (published in the Modern War Institute in 2025): 100% human written "Israel's Siege of Gaza City is Lawful and Necessary" (published in the Washington Post in 2025): 100% human written "Battle of Kyiv" (published in the Modern War Institute in 2025): 100% human written "Battle of Shusha" (published in the Modern War Institute in 2025): 93% human written "Battle of Hadrut" (published in the Modern War Institute in 2025): 90% human written "Antony Blinken's Ahistorical Advice for Israel" (published in the Wall Street Journal in 2024): 100% human written "Israel Implemented More Measures to Prevent Civilian Casualties Than Any Other Nation in History" (published in Newsweek in 2025): 100% human written Here's what I found for Fox's writings: "Israel is Succeeding in Gaza" (published in Tablet in May 2024): 100% human written "The Pros and Cons of Targeted Killings" (published in Quillette in August 2024): 100% human written "Weaponized Empathy': Hamas Exploits Western Ignorance of War, Military Experts Say" (published in the Jerusalem Post in September 2025): 100% human written "The IDF's Boot is on Hamas's Throat" (published in Tablet in August 2024): 100% human written "The British Government Must Not Abandon Israel" (speech republished in Fathom Journal in ): 100% human written "Lessons for Western Militaries from the Gaza War" (published in Quillette in March 2025): 85% human written Here's what I found in one of Spagat's writings: "Great Power Warfare and the Decline of War Question" (published in the William Thompson International Studies Quarterly, Volume 70, Issue 3, September 2026 [this month]): 41% AI (33% AI written, 8% AI Assisted) "Technical Debates Over Famine Definitions Miss the Point While Children in Gaza Starve" (Published in Action on Armed Violence (AOAV) in August 2025): 56% AI "The Black Box of Combat Deaths: Why Israel Must Release its Gaza Casualty Data" (Published in AOAV in August 2025): 81% AI Now, here's what I found in one of Mehdi Hasan's pieces: "The Media's Hasan Piker Obsession is Letting Republican Mike Rogers Off the Hook" (published in The Guardian, September 2026 [this month]): 100% AI written (Disclaimer: This is only based on the first 100 words because this is what's free)
1
4
483
Does he have credibility because he ordered the murder of Israelis…?
This is a sensible step if we want to get Middle East peace, and that's why many senior Israeli security officials have also called for releasing Barghouti. Abu Mazen doesn't have credibility on the Palestinian street, while Barghouti has the credibility to make concessions.
4
44
1,601
𝔼𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟 retweeted
A downtown Las Vegas resort is being accused of religious discrimination by a federal government agency after a former employee was allegedly sent home and later fired for refusing to remove a religious headscarf. STORY: lvrj.com/post/3891073
27
4
16
7,544
𝔼𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟 retweeted
Rachel says it plainly and clearly and matter-of-factly; it's really a shame that it should be even up to debate
Aside from the almost comically outrageous ‘Jews were called Muslims in Nazi concentration camps’ comment, Francesca goes on a long tirade here about the etymology of the term ‘antisemitism’ that is factually incorrect from start to finish. Every word is wrong and that is a matter of linguistic fact, not opinion. A quick Google search proves that. This woman is a brazen liar and it’s a damning indictment on the UN that she remains in her position.
2
15
171
10,259
He's convicted in a court of law of multiple counts of murder.
I am calling for the release of Marwan Bhargouti from Israeli prison.
41
76
1,481
37,983
𝔼𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟 retweeted
"I could not have given him an easier layup." University of Michigan student Iman Dashti joins @WillCainShow after confronting Abdul El-Sayed with a direct question: "I wanted to ask if you stand unequivocally against the IRGC?" But El-Sayed dodged answering his question. Dashti says he wanted a clear condemnation, telling Will Cain: "Just say you're against the world's largest sponsor of terror." "I think it has something to do with the fact that a lot of his supporters are very supportive of the IRGC. They love the Iranian regime and he doesn't want to alienate them." "He has an extreme base that just agrees with these horrible, horrible ideas that the majority of Americans don't believe in." @willcain
"Do you stand with us?" A young Iranian-American student tells Abdul El-Sayed his family was tormented at the hands of the Iranian regime. He says his cousin was hunted by the IRGC and his uncle was sentenced to death and lashed, then asks him directly: Do you stand "unequivocally against the IRGC"? El-Sayed does not directly condemn the IRGC by name. Instead, the Michigan Democratic Senate candidate warns against U.S.-led regime change and argues that anger toward foreign governments can be used to advance "corporate interests" tied to natural resources. He later goes further, saying regime change can become "a ploy for the interests of our corporations." "You still haven't said it, though," the student responds. "We're dying." See the tense exchange and what happens when the student presses him again: foxnews.com/politics/michiga…
295
2,667
10,560
675,340
𝔼𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟 retweeted
Slovenia's Prime Minister Janez Janša on Palestine: We must also be willing to ask difficult questions about how Palestine is discussed and used politically. A majority position does not by itself determine what is right. The right of a democratic state and its people to defend themselves against terrorism must be recognized and upheld not only in the words. Civilian suffering is tragic and must be addressed, but it can never justify terrorism or the pursuit of political objectives through violence.
29
53
354
48,265
𝔼𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟 retweeted
Secretary Lew is correct. All parties must commit to the 20-Point Plan. It is the only chance to peacefully disarm Hamas, empower a new technocratic government in Gaza, reconstruct lives and livelihoods, and provide real and lasting security for Israel.
28
56
210
10,723
You campaigned with people who want to kill Jews. Pipe down.
Mike Rogers told Michiganders he was an assembly line autoworker who made Chrysler LeBarons. Turns out it was a complete lie. Shameful. michiganadvance.com/2026/09/…
1
8
62
898
How does one ban private groups from spending in Democratic primaries? And why are you focusing on the Jewish one that itself is not a Super PAC?
The root of corruption is money in politics. Do you support @kenmartin73 grassroots initiative to ban Super PAC money, including AIPAC, in Democratic primaries? House Democrats support below, except we would not have kicked John Lewis out at 75.
3
7
39
1,485