Kaley v. United States, 571 U.S. 320, 355 (2014) (“Common sense tells us that secret decisions based only on one side of the story will prove inaccurate more often than those made after hearing from both sides.” (Roberts, C.J., dissenting)); see also United States v. Sineneng-Smith, 590 U.S. 371, 375 (2020) (“In our adversarial system of adjudication, we follow the principle of party presentation. As this Court stated in Greenlaw, in both civil and criminal cases, in the first instance and on appeal ..., we rely on the parties to frame the issues for decision and assign to courts the role of neutral arbiter of matters the parties present.” (citation omitted) (Ginsburg, J.)).
We just filed an emergency stay with SCOTUS. As I said, we would immediately seek relief. The other side has until Monday to respond (note how the Supreme Court lets both sides respond before ruling!).