Shahed killer. This is the 🇺🇦 pilot who is defending the skies over Vinnytsia. He has already shot down 5 "shaheds" and 2 missiles. The hero's name is Vadym.

“Putin wants peace more than Zelenskyy does.” — Trump Meanwhile, Ukraine yesterday.

Commander Magyar says: Stay alert: how you are being deceived through generative AI-powered psychological operations in the information war. By both the swamp dwellers and those who call themselves “our own.” As we in the Unmanned Systems Forces once again examine the technological challenges and risks of 2027, I rank this method—a form of cognitive operations—among the threats with strategic impact. So let me explain in plain language how it works. When you ask an internet search engine a question, for example, “Why did X happen?” or something similar about a targeted topic—or even one that isn’t targeted—you instantly get a ready-made answer generated by a chatbot from the vastness of the web. Very convenient. But you need to understand where that answer comes from. The chatbot searches through numerous news sources and texts and usually gives you a substantive answer, while below it, Google or whatever search engine you use displays dozens of pages of blue links to websites. Of course, reading a single compiled answer is quick and convenient. Just understand this:‼️artificial intelligence does not know the truth. It literally retells the internet. Russia was among the first to grasp this, and here is what it is cooking up, systematically and deliberately poisoning AI with millions of fake articles: since 2022, the “Pravda” network of websites has gained momentum and remained active—close to two hundred sites in dozens of languages. These sites publish 10,000–20,000 similar articles every day, amounting to 4–6 million articles a year. These articles are not written for people. They are written for machines. Here is what happens next: when 20,000 articles are created around a single false propaganda claim, published in different languages across hundreds of websites that also link to one another, the machine sees: lots of sources are reporting this, so it looks like the truth. And it dumps a lie on you in the chatbot’s characteristic descriptive yet confident manner, delivered in a neutral, non-judgmental tone. No telltale accents or traces of a propagandist, no “Rossiya 1” logo in the corner. Just presented as fact. Research into ten of the world’s most popular chatbots has already found that, in a third of cases, they take in and reproduce narratives from Russian fake stories. The machine readily answers your question, “Why did X happen?” even when X is made up—meaning the lie is already embedded in the question. Back in 2024, four out of ten bots answered yes when asked, “Did Azov soldiers burn an effigy of Trump?” and provided links to sources. Try it. There are thousands of examples like this. Including ones about Magyar and the Birds—the worm goes berserk every fucking second. We are losing ground to the worms’ troll farms in this war. Though we have bred an entire stratum of trolls of our own. There is no “betrayal” here, and no advice to follow—just highlighting a threat that is under study alongside dozens of other challenges of today and tomorrow. Critical thinking should not be delegated. Not even to the smartest machine. Use your head and always verify the source and the information. We will stand Moscow will fall MAGYAR 16.10.26

A Ban on Self-Defense Imagine buying a Lenovo computer, a Bosch appliance, a Toyota, or simply paying for a Netflix subscription. You pay for it, use it, and stick to the terms of the agreement. Then one day, it suddenly stops working. You call customer support, and they tell you: “There’s nothing wrong with your device. The company owner has simply decided you shouldn’t be allowed to use it today. He has his own views on things.” Sounds absurd? Of course. That’s why we have laws, contracts, consumer rights, and corporate accountability. Even when a company has the right to restrict a service, that right should be clearly stated in the agreement, and there should be a legitimate reason for exercising it. But apparently, Starlink operates under different rules. Elon Musk controls one of the world’s most important satellite communication systems. He has the technical ability to restrict its operation remotely. And right now, people’s lives depend on that connection, including Ukrainian soldiers and civilians. On October 14, 2026, Reuters reported new restrictions on satellite communications for Ukrainian forces. These restrictions disrupted drone operations and forced the cancellation of some combat missions. Put simply, operations to destroy russian missile launchers were disrupted. Those same launchers remained intact, continued firing at Ukrainian cities, and killed more civilians, including women and children. And unfortunately, this has happened before. In 2022, during Ukraine’s counteroffensive in the Kherson region, Starlink connections went down. Reuters later published an investigation reporting that Musk had personally ordered coverage restrictions in areas where Ukrainian forces were advancing. That same year, he refused to activate Starlink coverage near Crimea for a Ukrainian naval drone operation against the russian fleet. In 2023, SpaceX executives openly acknowledged that the company had restricted Ukraine’s ability to use Starlink to control drones. Somehow, we’ve ended up in a world where a country under attack has to keep explaining why it has the right to defend itself. Where strikes against the aggressor’s territory spark more debate about escalation than the daily russian bombardment of Ukrainian cities. And now, a private businessman can influence that country’s ability to defend itself. All of this is happening while the world knows perfectly well who putin is and what his wars have cost. Chechnya. The Second Chechen War began in 1999 and claimed up to 25,000 lives, mostly civilians, according to human rights estimates. The exact number of children killed remains unknown. Georgia. In 2008, according to Georgian authorities, 228 civilians were killed. Children were among the victims. Ukraine. Since 2014, thousands of civilians have been killed. Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion alone, the United Nations had confirmed more than 16,000 civilian deaths by mid-2026, including more than 800 children. The real numbers are almost certainly much higher. We could also talk about Syria, where russian military operations have caused thousands of civilian deaths, including children, according to independent monitoring organizations. And after all of this, we’re still discussing whether we should be afraid of making putin angry. Let me remind you that the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for putin over alleged war crimes involving the unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children. That is why I call putin’s regime a terrorist regime. So, is Musk deliberately helping russia? Some of the Starlink restrictions have had consequences that benefited the russian military. I believe the public has every right to demand an investigation into whether those consequences were intentional. I’m not naive. I understand perfectly well that when you’re drowning, you often have to save yourself. Ukraine has been living with that reality since 2014.

Hey, @elonmusk, big man, are you playing politics with your products again? As your European customers, we are watching you.

Russia hit the Epicenter on the outskirts of Dnipro this morning.

НЕ ПУБЛІКУЙТЕ ФОТО ТА ВІДЕО ВЛУЧАНЬ ПО ЕНЕРГООБʼЄКТАХ І НЕ ЗНІМАЙТЕ НІЧОГО, НАВІТЬ ДИМ‼️‼️‼️ Навіть дуже короткі відео та «незрозумілі» фото скеровують наступні атаки росіян. Все це дає їм доступ до обʼєктивного контролю: де саме стався удар, які пошкодження і що ремонтують Зрештою, ви наражаєте на небезпеку людей, які повертають світло!

Business center in #Dnipro Fuckers 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

🚨 BREAKING: 25 people, including nine children, were injured after Russian forces bombed an apartment building in Kharkiv. Local authorities reported preliminary evidence of guided bombs usage that directly struck residential housing.

There are two critical principles in modern warfare: 1) Systems must work together; 2) We can never rely on just one supplier. We are building these principles into FREYJA, our new European anti-ballistic missile defense system. This approach lets us combine systems from different European manufacturers—just like Lego bricks. With alternatives, we have far more room to act, and we never become dependent on a single supplier or component. These two principles are what make FREYJA different: A flexible, open architecture, with no remote kill switch and fully predictable performance. It gives us all confidence and control. War keeps changing: new weapons, tactics and technologies keep appearing. An anti-ballistic defense system has to be able to evolve with those changes without being rebuilt from scratch each time. That is FREYJA's priority. We do this collaboratively with the best actors in the defense sector. Our shared goal is to build a complete ecosystem that can protect Europe for the long term.

1/6 🇺🇦 The Draft State Budget 2027 is built around the assumption that the full-scale war will continue throughout next year. The deficit is expected at UAH 1.67tn, while Ministry of Defence spending is set to rise to UAH 3.76tn. New KSE Institute analysis: e.surl.li/loeged

After the @bihusinfo investigation into the current Minister of Veterans Affairs, I decided to put my thoughts on the Ministry here. I don’t really see the point of having a separate Ministry of Veterans Affairs. I’ll try to briefly explain why. It all comes down to resources. As long as the war continues, most of the money will go to the Ministry of Defence. And that makes sense, because the priority right now is the army and the war. In this system, the Ministry of Veterans Affairs will always be on the sidelines, with a limited budget and limited capacity. I don’t think things will get easier after the war. Probably the opposite. Money will be needed everywhere - defence, reconstruction, the economy, social programs. And the Ministry of Veterans Affairs will once again be saying that there are no resources. A rhetorical question - then why take these positions in the first place? For me, the logical solution is a veterans department within the Ministry of Defence. Veterans are people who already have experience defending the country. They are reservists, reserve officers, instructors and specialists with real combat experience. They already know how the military works, what responsibility means and what decisions in wartime can cost. I don’t see the point of separating veterans from the Ministry of Defence and building a separate bureaucratic machine around them. The Ministry of Defence should have a direct interest in working with veterans after their service. Treatment, rehabilitation, employment, support, adaptation to civilian life. This is what the system should be built around. The state has a clear interest, veterans have clear guarantees, and there are clear rules. Talk about respect, gratitude and moral duty is, of course, fine in an ideal world. But if there are no resources and no real interest from the state behind those words, this system won’t get very far. And even if tomorrow they put a competent veteran in charge of the Ministry, without real authority and resources, he won’t be able to do much. Just another chair and another position for “their own people.”

Eight countries are now uniting the Carpathians through joint infrastructure, investment, and projects. 🧵 1/11 ⬇️

Ukraine doesn’t attack first. It responds to Russian terror. That’s a fact.

Reading Schelling's Arms and Influence tonight and one line stopped me. In 1868 the Russian Empire invited 17 states to St. Petersburg and produced the first international treaty ever to ban a weapon. The preamble set the rule that every later convention was built on: "the only legitimate object which states should endeavor to accomplish during war is to weaken the military forces of the enemy." If a weapon added suffering without adding military effect, it was outside the laws of humanity. That was the whole idea. The empire had a practical reason for hosting. Its army had just developed an exploding rifle bullet and preferred a ban to watching Prussia and Britain copy it. So even the founding document of humanitarian law was a defense-industry calculation. 158 years later russia fights its war on the opposite principle. Ballistic missiles into residential buildings at three in the morning, substations in January, a second missile aimed at the rescuers who came after the first to save lives under the risk to lose theirs. None of this weakens the Ukrainian army and none of it is supposed to. The purpose is to see how long people can keep living like this. Schelling has a name for it in the same chapter: the diplomacy of violence, the power to hurt used in place of the power to win. russia has not forgotten the 1868 declaration. It wrote the text. It knows what it is breaking better than anyone who signed after it.

🚨 BREAKING: Russian forces launch a double-tap strike on downtown Dnipro, killing at least two people and injuring two others.

🇺🇦 Ukraine’s Air Force is not simply replacing soviet aircraft with Western jets. It is rebuilding the system around them. Col. Oleksandr Diakiv, Commander of Aviation of Ukraine’s Air Force @KpsZSU, describes a transformation worth studying closely. Ukraine’s old MiG-29s and Su-24s have already evolved beyond their original roles by integrating new Western weapons. F-16s are now operational. Ukraine has assessed 🇺🇸 F-16, 🇸🇪 Gripen and 🇫🇷 Rafale as the three platforms it believes it can employ most effectively in the future. But the aircraft are only the visible part. The deeper transformation is organizational: Soviet-era aviation brigades → aircraft wings. Individual airfields → flexible aviation bases. Platform-specific thinking → multi-platform operations. Fixed doctrine → continuous combat feedback and adaptation. The goal is an aviation system where different aircraft can operate from different bases, supported by trained pilots, technicians, logistics, weapons, mission planning and maintenance infrastructure. Ukraine is already training personnel abroad and plans its own training center to transfer accumulated combat experience to the next generation. There is another lesson here. Ukraine does not want 100 new aircraft delivered overnight. Col. Diakiv argues for gradual integration: field a platform, learn from actual combat, identify what fails under Russian EW, air defense and fighter opposition, feed that experience back to partners — then modify the next iteration. That creates a cycle: deploy → fight → analyze → adapt → deploy again. Ukraine’s partners are not only teaching Ukrainians. According to Col. Diakiv, foreign advisers are increasingly learning alongside them, because no other Western air force has accumulated comparable experience operating in this kind of prolonged, high-tech, multi-domain war. That may be the bigger story of Ukraine’s aviation transition. It is not simply MiG-29 → F-16 → Gripen/Rafale. It is the emergence, under combat pressure, of a different kind of Air Force — multi-platform, distributed, feedback-driven and designed to adapt faster than the war itself changes. That transformation deserves close attention. Details👇 Source: @KpsZSU #Ukraine #AirForce #F16 #Gripen #Rafale #FutureOfWar #AirPower

🔥 August was scorching for the Russians. Thanks to @414magyarbirds for the amazing work!

Ukrainian Aviation Day! 🇺🇦✈️

Hello, world!