Documenting the worst betrayal in US history. Sources include @HouseBenghazi @KenTimmerman @SharylAttkisson Mitchell Zuckoff @BenghaziAttacks @BradleyPodliska

Benghazi Notes retweeted
The question is: having been invited to the meeting to support the false narrative of the Benghazi video (and allegedly saying he now regrets he attended), what obligation does @Morrell have as a senior civil servant to timely set the record straight not only to protect the CIA’s credibility, but his own integrity? And at what point did it become obvious that the video tall tale was just ONE piece of the broader effort to mislead Americans using false “intel’? Did he not know that Brennan at al were “cooking the books” on Putin supporting Trump? What about Morell leading the effort to gather signatures (wrongfully) also questioning the validity of the Hunter Biden info ? All this while “leading” the (supposedly nonpartisan) CIA. How far is silence — and supporting activity — from complicity in wrongdoing? @C__Herridge @Heritage
Former Deputy CIA Director Mike Morell was asked by the Obama White House to attend alongside @AmbassadorRice at a 11/27/12 meeting on Capitol Hill with 3 senators to explain why she sold the anti-Islam video explanation for the #Benghazi attacks on the Sunday talk shows. Morell's assignment as explained by the Obama White House was to support the notion that Rice's #Benghazi video story aligned with the assessment of intelligence analysts, which is a complete fabrication. In retrospect, Morell said he regretted attending the meeting. He realized that @BarackObama only wanted him there for political purposes. Morell was to take any blame for the video protest narrative to protect Susan Rice, who was hoping to replace @HillaryClinton as Secretary of State. This is another example of how Pres. Obama only saw the #Benghazi attacks through a purely political lens. Whether it was to protect his own re-election or Rice's candidacy for the Secretary of State job, telling the truth was not an option because it posed too high a political cost.
1
4
162
Former Deputy CIA Director Mike Morell was asked by the Obama White House to attend alongside @AmbassadorRice at a 11/27/12 meeting on Capitol Hill with 3 senators to explain why she sold the anti-Islam video explanation for the #Benghazi attacks on the Sunday talk shows. Morell's assignment as explained by the Obama White House was to support the notion that Rice's #Benghazi video story aligned with the assessment of intelligence analysts, which is a complete fabrication. In retrospect, Morell said he regretted attending the meeting. He realized that @BarackObama only wanted him there for political purposes. Morell was to take any blame for the video protest narrative to protect Susan Rice, who was hoping to replace @HillaryClinton as Secretary of State. This is another example of how Pres. Obama only saw the #Benghazi attacks through a purely political lens. Whether it was to protect his own re-election or Rice's candidacy for the Secretary of State job, telling the truth was not an option because it posed too high a political cost.
14
152
259
2,614
Mike Morell, the deputy CIA director who overhauled the #Benghazi talking points by replacing the truth of a terrorist attack with the lie of a spontaneous protest, conducted 2 internal reviews of the talking points in late 2012: Analytic Line Review and "Lessons Learned." The Analytic Line Review went through each piece of CIA analysis after the #Benghazi attacks to determine how strong the supporting evidence was for each of the analytic assessments. It was completed in January 2013 and sent to Congress. @BarackObama cited executive privilege to block the "Lessons Learned" review from being sent to Congress. This review included the #Benghazi talking points drafts as well as details on the process that was followed in drafting them.
9
114
180
1,379
Former regional security officer of U.S. Embassy in Tripoli Eric Nordstrom correctly testified that top people in @HillaryClinton's State Dept were allowed by the Accountability Review Board to escape any accountability for the failures that preceded the #Benghazi attack. Inexplicably, the ARB decided that it was not necessary to interview people at the top of the State Dept, including Hillary Clinton, Deputy Sec. of State Bill Burns, or Deputy Secretary of State Tom Nides. The name "Accountability Review Board" is ironic. Nordstrom testified "It’s an accountability of midlevel officer review board, and the message to my colleagues is that if you are above a certain level, no matter what your decision is, no one is going to question it." For any Obama Administration official looking to escape accountability for the #Benghazi disaster and cover-up going forward, Hillary's State Dept ARB report became the undisputed authority and final word on the matter, and they used it time and time again.
13
177
276
2,052
Hillary's ARB report questioned Ambassador Stevens's decision-making, stating "his expertise on #Benghazi in particular, caused Washington to give UNUSUAL deference to his judgements." This was a clear attempt to exonerate themselves and blame Stevens for his own death. It cannot be true that Washington deferred to Stevens and that Washington also rejected his security requests. We know factually that the latter is true. So the former cannot be. The ARB report claimed that Stevens "made the decision to travel to #Benghazi independently of Washington" and that "Plans for the Ambassador's trip...were not shared THOROUGHLY with the Embassy's country team." Deputy Ambassador to Libya Gregory Hicks proved accusations of Stevens from Hillary's ARB report were lies, confirming that Stevens's daily plans were routinely shared within the State Dept and that his planned trip to #Benghazi was shared w/ HQ several weeks in advance.
22
162
268
1,902
Benghazi Notes retweeted
These are just the examples we know about that became public. How many journalists like myself, Sharyl Atkisson, Catherine Herridge & so on were blackballed behind our backs? The media think this only works one way - they can choose not to cover Trump’s speeches or his rallies or his achievements and no one can hold them to account. He just has to take it & let them walk all over him in the name of a “free press”? They can report one false story after another, stories that generate YEARS of coverage like Russia collusion or the fake Climate Change scam - and they never have to correct the record or print the truth? These self-righteous, hypocrites long ago buried real journalism & have been dancing on its grave ever since. They say nothing about press freedom when independent journalists are beaten by Antifa or when independent media organizations & journalists are targeted with law suits to bankrupt them because they told the truth. These people have no credibility left. And once again Fox News is showing you who they have become.
White House Access Is a Privilege Not a Right FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Last week, President Donald J. Trump removed CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House grounds after years of false reporting . The First Amendment protects their right to publish; it does not entitle them to a hard pass, briefing room seat, or place in the press pool. Access changes are nothing new. What is new, however, is the sudden claim that it becomes sacred only when the outlets are friendly to the Radical Left. The rule was never “every outlet gets in.” It was always “our side stays in.” For years, Democrat Administrations have restricted, punished, and locked out the press. 2009: The Obama White House branded Fox News as the “research arm” and “communications arm” of the Republican Party, barred it from a round of exclusive Sunday show interviews, instructed agencies to “skip” including it in pooled coverage, derided it as “really not news,” and undertook an all-out effort to isolate the organization. Barack Hussein Obama now calls a Fox ban “unimaginable,” but his White House tried it and his spokesman admitted they were willing to do it. 2010: The Obama Justice Department labeled Fox News correspondent James Rosen a possible “co-conspirator” in a criminal leak case, secretly monitored his emails and phone calls, and tracked his movements an “unprecedented” level of surveillance and intimidation of a journalist over his reporting. 2011: Obama White House officials restricted the Boston Herald from coverage writing that pool slots depended on covering Obama “fairly” after the paper ran a front page Mitt Romney op-ed. 2011: After a San Francisco Chronicle reporter recorded protesters interrupting an Obama fundraiser, White House officials threatened to strip the outlet from access and warned of retaliation if the paper reported on it. 2012: The Obama Justice Department secretly seized two months of telephone records covering more than 20 Associated Press lines used by more than a dozen journalists targeting them over their reporting. 2023: The Biden White House blocked New York Post reporter Steven Nelson from covering the President’s only daytime public event despite empty seats in the room after the reporter pressed Biden on his family’s shady business dealings. 2023: The Biden Administration restricted more than 440 reporters from White House access through a new, retroactive press credentialing process with independent and conservative journalists taking a heavy share of the hit. The White House Correspondents’ Association barely objected. 2008: In the Obama campaign’s final days, senior campaign officials pulled reporters from three prominent outlets off the traveling press plane restricting them from coverage after the papers endorsed Obama’s opponent. 2021: The same media now suing once urged a ban on Fox News. CNN’s Brian Stelter repeatedly floated removing Fox News from the White House press tool as a “political tool,” and later even suggested Fox News be dropped from cable altogether. During the first 100 days of President Trump’s second term, the Media Research Center found that 92% of coverage by mainstream outlets was negative compared to nearly 60% positive coverage during the same period under Biden. That’s more like a political operation with cameras than a free press holding power to account. No President is required to host a hostile operation on the grounds. Access has always been a privilege and President Trump is applying that rule. Distributed on September 21st, 2026.
390
5,649
16,374
226,650
The fact that @raymaxwell55 witnessed @HillaryClinton's Sunday after-hours #Benghazi document purge session in the basement of State Dept HQ and that he was one of 4 personnel reprimanded by the Accountability Review Board and placed on administrative leave should not be seen as mere coincidence. The ARB said it was "troubled" by Maxwell's "lack of leadership and engagement on staffing and security issues in Benghazi." This groundless claim was simply a lazy attempt to scapegoat someone other than Clinton who wasn't even interviewed by the ARB. Maxwell's unjust administrative leave lasted a year despite no official charge being levied against him. Ultimately the State Dept cleared him of wrongdoing and reinstated him. He retired a short time later in Nov. 2013. (1/2) piped.video/tDwh9i2eBTw?si=z8cl…
11
140
213
2,436
An accomplished poet, Ray Maxwell wrote a poem titled "Trapped in a purgatory of their own deceit." It reads: “The web of lies they weave / gets tighter and tighter / in its deceit / until it bottoms out — / at a very low frequency — / and implodes… Yet all the while, / the more they talk, / the more they lie, / and the deeper down the hole they go… Just wait…/ just wait and feed them the rope.” (2/2)
1
16
33
213
When the Accountability Review Board requested State Dept documents regarding #Benghazi for its investigation, @HillaryClinton's senior staff members orchestrated a purge of any documents that shed a bad light on her and the State Dept, and handed over only the remainder to the ARB. This document purge was witnessed by former State Dept Deputy Assistant Secretary Ray Maxwell @raymaxwell55 in an after-hours Sunday session in the basement level of State Dept DC headquarters. He wasn't invited but decided to show up anyways when he heard about it. When he arrived, Maxwell observed boxes and stacks of documents. A State Dept office director told him "Ray, we are to go through these stacks and pull out anything that might put anybody in the [Near Eastern Affairs] front office or the seventh floor in a bad light." The "seventh floor" was State Department shorthand for Hillary and her senior advisers. Two of those advisers, Hillary's chief of staff Cheryl Mills and Deputy Chief of Staff @jakejsullivan were present and overseeing the document purge. When Maxwell asked the State Dept office director participating in the document purge session "But isn’t that unethical?" she responded, "Ray, those are our orders." Maxwell soon left the session because he didn't feel good about it.
23
271
407
3,508
Benghazi Notes retweeted
She also self-appointed who ran the ARB
1
3
15
582
Benghazi Notes retweeted
They never talked to any of us
7
27
200
1,733
Like sending a fox to guard the henhouse, @HillaryClinton's State Dept established an "Accountability Review Board" (ARB) on 10/4/12 to conduct a self-investigation of the #Benghazi attacks. The ARB issued its report in December 2012. The co-chairs of the ARB were former Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen and former US Ambassador to the U.N. Thomas Pickering. In what would clearly be condemned as a conflict of interest in any other scenario, Clinton counsel Beth Jones admitted that she had close personal and professional relationships with both ARB co-chair Pickering and the executive director of the ARB staff, Uzra Zeya. (1/2)
22
157
286
3,306
4 out of the 5 members of the State Dept Accountability Review Board investigating the #Benghazi attacks were appointed by @HillaryClinton herself, virtually assuring she would be immune to any culpability. The fact that the ARB never interviewed Hillary, the one person in the State Dept who deserved the most scrutiny in relation to the #Benghazi disaster, removes any doubt that the goal of its investigation was to exonerate her, rendering the investigation useless. Even though she was never interviewed, Hillary was briefed regularly on the ongoing ARB investigation. ARB Co-Chair Mullen at one point had called Hillary's chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, to give her a heads up after ARB interviewed a potential congressional witness. Specifically, the supposedly honorable and unbiased Mike Mullen testified that he gave Mills “a heads-up that I didn’t think that Charlene Lamb would be a witness at that point in time that would represent the department well.” (2/2)
3
28
49
390
As an investigative journalist working for CBS News in 2012, @SharylAttkisson received statements from State Dept officials not wanting to be quoted by name claiming that Ambassador Stevens was at least partly to blame for his own death. One State Dept official painted Stevens as a "renegade" who went to #Benghazi on his own accord without their knowledge, but quickly added "That's not for attribution." @HillaryClinton's State Dept spread their spin that blamed Stevens so widely amongst their press contacts, that many of Attkisson's colleagues used similar wording in casual conversations. The copycat wording was in statements/questions like "Why would Stevens choose to go to #Benghazi on 9/11?" and "I hear he was kind of a renegade." and "I'm not even sure the State Dept knew he was going to Benghazi."
41
212
382
4,818
After the entire @60Minutes interview confirming that Pres. Obama lied in the town hall presidential debate was posted online, CBS News President @davidgrayrhodes met with @SharylAttkisson and pretended that withholding the interview from the public was an accident. Trying to sound as if he was taking responsibility, he then said "as soon as it was brought to my attention I took steps to correct it." This is simply not true because no action was taken until Attkisson and some of her colleagues demanded it. Then Rhodes promised that if there were congressional hearings over the CBS News deception on #Benghazi, he would tell the truth. That was an empty promise because there never were any hearings. The next lie Rhodes told her was that an internal CBS News investigation of incident would be conducted. Certainly withholding consequential facts from voters in the runup to an election is a serious problem. But the investigation never happened.
14
272
459
3,733
For @CBSNews and its then-president @davidgrayrhodes, being forced to be transparent and publish the entire 60 Minutes interview on its web site on the Sunday night before the election was a small concession. For nearly 8 weeks, CBS News had accomplished its mission of feeding the public the false #Benghazi narrative as a political operative for its chosen 2012 presidential candidate @BarackObama, all under the guise of being a trustworthy news organization. Not coincidentally, CBS News used the same strategy as the Obama Administration itself when it came to explaining the #Benghazi terrorist attack: make the first and lasting impression a lie, then quietly confess the truth when public interest has faded away. It should come as a surprise to nobody that the reason the #Benghazi strategies of both CBS News and the Obama Administration were so closely coupled is that then CBS News President David Rhodes and Obama's strategic communications advisor @brhodes are brothers. It was Ben Rhodes who prepped @AmbassadorRice as the public messenger of the Obama White House strategy to blame the #Benghazi attacks on the anti-Islam YouTube video. But getting his brother David to direct CBS News to spread the same lie is even more disgusting.
16
97
158
1,426
After nearly 8 weeks of @CBSNews purposefully withholding its complete @60Minutes interview and misleading the public to believe @BarackObama's false #Benghazi narrative, @SharylAttkisson was finally sent the transcript of the entire interview by a colleague. Attkisson and her colleague knew instantly that this was toxic for CBS News. 8 years after disgraced anchor Dan Rather was shown the door, this was incontrovertible evidence that the network was once again engaged in intentionally misleading the public for political purposes. Both Attkisson and her colleague agreed that the complete interview had to be published before the 2012 presidential election, which was now only a few days away. Over the next 48 hours, Attkisson and a small group of colleagues made individual contact with news executives to demand the full interview be published. It was only a matter of time before people outside of CBS News found out. On the Sunday night before the election, the network relented and posted the entire 60 Minutes interview which included Pres. Obama's #Benghazi assessment that "it's too early to know exactly how this came about." Of course, it wasn't on CBS Evening News. Just the CBS News web site.
8
152
263
2,822
With a taped @60Minutes interview in its exclusive possession where @BarackObama's own words proactively exposed his #Benghazi claim in the presidential debate as a lie, @CBSNews executives decided to keep the COMPLETE interview hidden, even from their own reporters. Instead of pursuing truth and facts, CBS News producers intentionally directed their correspondents to include cherrypicked sound bites from the interview that supported the false notion that Obama called the #Benghazi attacks terrorism the day after in the Rose Garden. This was the false narrative that CBS News executives pushed repeatedly for stories included in their most prominent newscast "CBS Evening News." In the meantime, as @SharylAttkisson broke stories that chipped away at the credibility of Obama's #Benghazi narrative, she found her work was increasingly excluded from "Evening News" and relegated to less prominent platforms including the CBS News web site.
11
174
308
5,370
Benghazi Notes retweeted
Interesting note: Obama and Clinton were still aligned on the Benghazi response at this point. Forty-eight hours later, on Friday, the two camps weren't speaking to each other. The only go betweens after Friday were Rhodes (Obama), Sullivan (Clinton), and Pelton (Rice).
1
5
23
604