I am passionate about neutral studies, but only when their results are true negatives, not false negatives due to low statistical power. I particularly appreciate them when they eliminate drugs with seemingly routine indications but are actually poorly supported by literature or developed in an era where it was easy to beat placebo. Think of beta-blockers in REDUCE-MI. Or what is happening in the aspirin-free realm. These "x-free studies" could be a new research trend, where randomized registries have tremendous potential. Imagine a statin-free study in patients with PCSK9 inhibitors. Where is it written that we must always test drugs in addition? Couldn't we test drugs in subtraction more often?