Stop the Glyphosate Loophole in California. If you live in CA and can support this, it'd be awesome. Otherwise, they can spray any chemicals on you with no warning or informed consent in the name of fire mitigation. Dont you think you have a right to know what is being sprayed on or around you and to agree with it or not? votervoice.net/Shares/BAAAAA…

Birds of a feather flock together.

DITTO. I just flew half way across the globe to inform Savages in EU and Asia we have Rothschild/Rockefeller Math/Physics hacks being introduced by tech criminals in Core and Treasury companies trying to ossify Bitcoin to help give governments they control power back. "The Bitcoin Landauer Attack" is one few saw coming. The Rothschilds Paid Epstein 25 million a year too hack the Human Genome Project to protect Rockefeller and to hack the OG's of Bitcoin associated with MIT math and physics dept to place the idea of how to use an obscure thermodynamics principle that is an axiomatic law for decentralized systems that use energy to operate to slowly destroy it over 130 years. The idea was placed in 2014-2015 and then from there it went to Google and to ChainLab and it was finally executed by a capture core developer who using inscriptions. That Core Dev was isolated by the Bitcoin OGs operating with the people who controlled Epstein, but he followed a specific career path and was allowed to launch the attack. Below is how the Rockefeller's used it in medicine. I was not able to show this slide in Prague. So I described how they did it. To link this plot to Epstein the Core dev posted an inscription to the basechain that showed a cartoon Pepe riding a skate board and it was linked to childhood sexual abuse visual images that were then subsequently blocked out. One of my former patients sent me this information and told me he worked with the devious dev and told me they were using Landauer's Principle to first degrade the chain, ossify it, and then implement their solution in the next few decades. All Bitcoin Savages must know who these fuckers are and absulutely treat them like Roger Ver. This attack was far more dangerous to Bitcoin because it is an existential threat to the base chain's existence. I told Brunnell this in Prague and her reaction to this idea was not well recieved. The Press has a duty to report the news not report on what they like and don't like. Node Runners are the immunse system of BITCOIN and we can eliminate these pathological fucks from our ecosystem when we only use nodes signaling for BIP-110. Anyone who argues otherwise does not understand the physics or math of Landauer's principle because it is an AXIOMATIC law of nature that will slowly ruin Bitcoin with TIME ENTROPY.

Dear @X, thank you for the Timelines feature 🙏 Please separate Bitcoin from "crypto" in Topics, as they have very little to do with each other at this point. Most of us want Bitcoin news and discussion, but will not voluntarily consume "crypto" content.

Consciousness is neither found nor preserved on the moon. It's infinite and eternal. Even if the world and moon were to explode, consciousness remains.

Nope. Not doing this BS again

You re-assemble the whole world every morning Went on a morning walk. Saw a peacock in open nature. Peacocks are not native to my region and I've never seen one here. When you see something unlikely it's a good sign. It means your consciousness is not stuck-in-a-rut and you can perceive/receive outside of it. I believe you re-assemble the whole world every morning, based on habit. Every day is a fresh start that can present something entirely different. But our days are similar to previous days because we re-assemble the world based on rigid expectations. Reduce your expectation and let yourself be surprised.

50 non-physical things people want 1. To learn and use language well 2. To practice reason and discernment 3. To discover truth 4. To explore 5. To take risks 6. To find purpose 7. To set boundaries 8. To create order out of chaos 9. To use imagination 10. To seek patterns 11. To see and create beauty 12. To create something 13. To develop abilities 14. To feel attuned to nature 15. To feel the wholeness of Being 16. To love 17. To learn how to handle the darker sides of life 18. To feel something 19. To feel unique or think or act differently from others 20. To make choices 21. To have autonomy or independence 22. To defend territory or have property 23. To stand for one's ideas and beliefs 24. To feel at home 25. To transcend self 26. To have friendship 27. To experience physical touch 28. To be loved 29. To have children 30. To have pets 31. To share humor 32. To have the company of others 33. To play games 34. To be accepted 35. To belong to something higher than themselves 36. To show compassion and altruism 37. To learn 38. To be committed to something 39. To excel at something 40. To overcome obstacles and achieve something 41. To be recognized for something 42. To have community 43. To have festivals, celebrations or ceremonies 44. To have stories, narratives and myths 45. To have visions, goals or look forward to something 46. To showcase, lecture or explain 47. To have ethical or moral codes 48. To have justice 49. To make sense of things 50. To have tasks 51. To have influence 52. To take responsibility 53. To be able to imitate 54. To admire or respect 55. To give and take 56. To get or give forgiveness 57. To accept a thing 58. To experience silence, prayer or meditation 59. To have surprise and mystery 60. To have energy

The Intuitive Awareness Method This is the basic technique from my book "The Intuitive Awareness Method". The trick is to imagine each possible answer AS 100% TRUE and then allow your physical and spiritual body to react. The mind is not a good advisor at discerning true/false but if you let body memory, muscles, chest/heart feel a thing, they'll know. If this works well for you, share it far and wide.

The difference between chemtrails and contrails. 👍🏻👍🏻

This man literally tells Neuroscience trick to stop negative thought loops.

A Federal Bill to end Geoengneering! Thank you @RepGregSteube for sponsoring the AIR QUALITY ACT to end the spraying of our skies. Please share far & wide! We need this to become law. @FmrRepMTG @JillianMichaels @dreadematteo @Tboo211 @SenRandPaul steube.house.gov/press-relea…

I usually ignore Bitcoin critics. Ninety-nine percent of the time, it’s the right move. I’ve spent years thinking through the objections, stress-testing the thesis, and running the numbers. I don’t feel the need to rehash the same arguments just to prove something to someone online. But every once in a while, one is worth engaging - not because it rattles me, but because it sharpens my own thinking. This week, an early architect of the internet argued that Bitcoin likely doesn’t implode. He admitted the network works, the code runs, and it probably survives. But survival, in his view, doesn’t justify a premium valuation. His thesis is that over time enthusiasm wanes, capital rotates elsewhere, and what remains is a niche asset supported by committed believers rather than something foundational to the global monetary system. It’s a serious critique, resting on two core claims: Bitcoin isn’t a widely used currency, and it isn’t a store of value. If the scoreboard is whether you can buy coffee with it at Starbucks, then sure - Bitcoin hasn’t won that battle. But that framing ignores something important: most holders don’t want to spend it. They view it as a savings asset that’s still monetizing. Stronger money tends to be hoarded, not circulated. Gold didn’t fail because people weren’t buying groceries with it - reserve assets sit underneath systems; they’re held, not swiped. On the store-of-value point, judging Bitcoin by a single 12-month window misses the broader arc. Over 15+ years, through multiple cycles and sharp drawdowns, the long-term trajectory has been upward as adoption and infrastructure expand. Gold earned its reputation because of its properties - scarcity, durability, portability, and divisibility. Bitcoin offers those properties in digital form and improves on them, with verifiable fixed supply, frictionless global transfer, and native cross-border settlement without intermediaries. Ultimately, the disagreement isn’t about whether Bitcoin can fail - it’s about how probable that outcome really is. I’ve always said this is an asymmetric bet: it either embeds itself into the global financial system over time, or it stagnates and becomes marginal. When I look at how institutions are positioning, how governments are talking about it, and how the surrounding infrastructure keeps expanding, it looks far more like integration than irrelevance. These debates won’t be decided in threads. They’ll be decided over decades. I’m comfortable holding Bitcoin while time does the scoring.

Please call your senator and ask for voter ID to be passed

Dear @LukeDashjr, I’ve only recently begun engaging with the pro-Coretard ecosystem, and it has already given me a clearer sense of how difficult these past years must have been for you. The level of intellectual dishonesty and short-sightedness — displayed so openly and without the slightest shame — is, to say the least, astonishing. It speaks volumes about the pressure you’ve had to endure. Through these turbulent times, you have shown discipline, restraint, and principled leadership in what is arguably one of the most important causes of our time. Adversity does not merely test character — it reveals it. In that sense, even this Coretard opposition has served a purpose. The world may not realize it yet — but it owes you. Thank you.

2014 the blocksize war hadn't even started. Andreesen and the MIT people were the big blockers. You can see his emails with coin base talking about wanting to fork it. The bcashers are the peope whose IQ is too low to understand the complex point that increasing the blocksize increases the cost of running nodes and makes the network centralized. Also letting the corporates hard fork would mean they can then hard fork and change the supply and ruin the best thing about bitcoin. And they're all too stupid to understand that continuing to increase the blocksize is a doomed and utterly moronic way to scale because it makes block chain size grow enormously and creates bandwidth bottlenecks and most importantly, will never ever be enough to accommodate mass consumer payments on chain. It is absolutely astonishing to see people still unable to get this in 2026, after 9 years of watching the stupid bcash scam apply these stupid ideas and get utterly destroyed. Bitcoiners didn't want to increase the blocksize because they were tricked by censorship on reddit,but because they are not cognitively impaired like bcashers.

WHAT IS THE CATALYST FOR $120+TN IN FIXED INCOME TO BE REBALANCED INTO SCARCE ASSETS? The Great Rebalancing is underway @jsblokland & i caught up to discuss